Resampling approach to statistical inference: Bootstrapping from event-related potentials data

We propose the use of the bootstrap resampling technique as a tool to assess the within-subject reliability of experimental modulation effects on event-related potentials (ERPs). The assessment of the within-subject reliability is relevant in all those cases when the subject score is obtained by some estimation procedure, such as averaging. In these cases, possible deviations from the assumptions on which the estimation procedure relies may lead to severely biased results and, consequently, to incorrect functional inferences. In this study, we applied bootstrap analysis to data from an experiment aimed at investigating the relationship between ERPs and memory processes. ERPs were recorded from two groups of subjects engaged in a recognition memory task. During the study phase, subjects in Group A were required to make an orthographic judgment on 160 visually presented words, whereas subjects in Group B were only required to pay attention to the words. During the test phase all subjects were presented with the 160 previously studied words along with 160 new words and were required to decide whether the current word was “old” or “new.” To assess the effect of word imagery value, half of the words had a high imagery value and half a low imagery value. Analyses of variance performed on ERPs showed that an imagery-induced modulation of the old/new effect was evident only for subjects who were not engaged in the orthographic task during the study phase. This result supports the hypothesis that this modulation is due to some aspect of the recognition memory process and not to the stimulus encoding operations that occur during the recognition memory task. However, bootstrap analysis on the same data showed that the old/new effect on ERPs was not reliable for all the subjects. This result suggests that only a cautious inference can be made from these data.

[1]  J. Rohrbaugh,et al.  Electrocortical signs of levels of processing: perceptual analysis and recognition memory. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[2]  M. Rugg,et al.  Recognition memory for new associations: electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  R. Blair,et al.  An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[4]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  Recognition memory for words and pictures: an event‐related potential study , 1997, Neuroreport.

[5]  E. Donchin,et al.  “P300” and memory: Individual differences in the von Restorff effect , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  R. Johnson,et al.  A spatio-temporal analysis of recognition-related event-related brain potentials. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  Darryl G. Humphrey,et al.  Toward a Psychophysiological Assessment of Dynamic Changes in Mental Workload , 1994, Human factors.

[8]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection , 1998 .

[9]  U. Böckenholt,et al.  Bootstrapping: applications to psychophysiology. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[10]  M. Smith,et al.  Decomposition of recognition memory event-related potentials yields target, repetition, and retrieval effects. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  E Donchin,et al.  The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Carlo Tagliavini,et al.  Lessico di frequenza della lingua Italiana contemporanea , 1972 .

[13]  S. Sutton,et al.  Event-related potentials during continuous recognition memory. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[14]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event‐Related Potential Studies of Cerebral Specialization during Reading , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  H. Pratt,et al.  Lexicality and Modality Effects on Evoked Potentials in a Memory-Scanning Task , 1994, Brain and Language.

[16]  Event-related potentials and recognition memory: the effects of word imagery value. , 1993, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  D Friedman,et al.  Cognitive event-related potential components during continuous recognition memory for pictures. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[18]  H. Jasper Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .

[19]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related potential studies of cerebral specialization during reading I. Studies of normal adults , 1982, Brain and Language.

[20]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[21]  M. Rugg,et al.  Lexical contribution to nonword-repetition effects: Evidence from event-related potentials , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[22]  M. Rugg ERP studies of memory. , 1995 .

[23]  M. Rugg The effects of semantic priming and work repetition on event-related potentials. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[24]  W Lang,et al.  Brain potentials with old/new distinction of non-words and geometric figures. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  Noldy-Cullum Ne,et al.  Recognition memory for pictures and words: the effect of incidental and intentional learning on N400. , 1987 .

[26]  A. Paivio Abstractness, imagery, and meaningfulness in paired-associate learning , 1965 .

[27]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Event-related potentials, semantic processes, and expectancy factors in word recognition , 1987, Brain and Language.

[28]  M. Rugg,et al.  The effects of task on the modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[29]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[30]  Event-related potentials and recognition memory within the 'levels of processing' framework. , 1993, Neuroreport.