Enhanced relative BOLD signal changes in T2‐weighted stimulated echoes

The origin of the stimulus/task‐induced signal changes in spin echo (SE) functional MRI (fMRI) at high magnetic fields is dynamic averaging due to diffusion in the presence of field gradients surrounding deoxyhemoglobin‐containing microvasculature. The same mechanism is expected to be operative in stimulated echoes (STE). Compared to SE‐fMRI, however, STE‐fMRI has the potential for larger diffusion weighting and consequently larger stimulus/task‐induced signal changes as a result of an additional delay, the mixing time, TM. In the present study, functional signal changes were quantified for both primary echo (PRE) and STE as a function of echo and mixing time. The relative blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes in STE were larger than in PRE at the same echo time and increased with both mixing and echo time. The contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) of the STE, however, is close to the CNR of the PRE, indicating an increase of physiological noise with longer mixing times. In addition, the signal attenuation due to diffusion in the presence of magnetic field gradients near blood vessels was modeled using Monte Carlo simulations. They support the hypothesis that the sensitivity of the STE to fluctuations of susceptibility‐induced magnetic field gradients near microvasculature is enhanced as a result of an extended diffusion time. Magn Reson Med 58:754–762, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  C. Springer,et al.  Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in nmr studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  X Zhang,et al.  New strategy for reconstructing partial‐Fourier imaging data in functional MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Magnetic field and tissue dependencies of human brain longitudinal 1H2O relaxation in vivo , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  R. D. Gibson.  Theory and problems of heat transfer, (schaum's outline series): McGraw-Hill, New York (1978) , 1979 .

[5]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Combined imaging–histological study of cortical laminar specificity of fMRI signals , 2006, NeuroImage.

[6]  Bente Pakkenberg,et al.  Comparison of MR imaging against physical sectioning to estimate the volume of human cerebral compartments , 2003, NeuroImage.

[7]  R. Weisskoff,et al.  MRI susceptometry: Image‐based measurement of absolute susceptibility of MR contrast agents and human blood , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  H. Pfeifer.  Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy , 1992 .

[9]  Murray R. Spiegel,et al.  Schaum's outline of theory and problems of statistics. , 1961 .

[10]  H. Möller,et al.  Transient signal changes in diffusion‐weighted stimulated echoes during neuronal stimulation at 3T , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Why does MTR change with neuronal depolarization? , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  N Fujita,et al.  Extravascular contribution of blood oxygenation level‐dependent signal changes: A numerical analysis based on a vascular network model , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Bruno Madore.  Using UNFOLD to remove artifacts in parallel imaging and in partial‐Fourier imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  A. Shmuel,et al.  Imaging brain function in humans at 7 Tesla , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Spin‐echo fMRI in humans using high spatial resolutions and high magnetic fields , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  H. Duvernoy,et al.  Cortical blood vessels of the human brain , 1981, Brain Research Bulletin.

[17]  B R Rosen,et al.  Mr contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  N. Gelman,et al.  Interregional variation of longitudinal relaxation rates in human brain at 3.0 T: Relation to estimated iron and water contents , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Philip W. Kuchel,et al.  Mean residence time of molecules diffusing in a cell bounded by a semi-permeable membrane: Monte Carlo simulations and an expression relating membrane transition probability to permeability , 2000, European Biophysics Journal.

[20]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Water diffusion compartmentation and anisotropy at high b values in the human brain , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Factors governing diffusing molecular signals in brain extracellular space , 2004, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[22]  X Hu,et al.  Elimination of k-space spikes in fMRI data. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  Laura M Parkes,et al.  Improved accuracy of human cerebral blood perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: Accounting for capillary water permeability , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Extracellular space structure revealed by diffusion analysis , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  Toralf Mildner,et al.  An Investigation of the Value of Spin-Echo-Based fMRI Using a Stroop Color–Word Matching Task and EPI at 3 T , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. Gore,et al.  Compartmental study of T1 and T2 in rat brain and trigeminal nerve in vivo , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.