A quantitative test of different magnetic field models using conjunctions between DMSP and geosynchronous orbit. Discussion

We report here on a study which tests the magnetic field line mapping between geosynchronous orbit and the ionosphere. The mapping is determined both observationally and fiom five magnetospheric magnetic field models. The mapping is tested observationally by comparing electron energy spectra obtained by the Magnetospheric Plasma Analyzer (MPA) at geosynchronous orbit and by the DMSP spacecraft. Because the orbits are nearly perpendicular, in general, the spectra match well for only a few seconds providing a good determination of when DMSP crosses the geosynchronous drift shell. In this way the mapping between geosynchronous orbit and the ionosphere can be determined to better than one degree. We then compare the measured magnetic footpoints of geosynchronous orbit with the footpoints predicted by five magnetospheric field models: Tsyganenko-89, Tsyganenko-87, Tsyganenko-82, Oslen-Pfitzer, and Hilmer-Voigt. Based on a set of over 100 measured magnetic conjunctions we find that, in general, there are significant differences between the mappings predicted by various magnetic field models but that there is no clear “winner” in predicting the observed mapping. We find that the range of magnetic latitudes at which we measure conjunctions is much broader than the range of latitudes which the models can accommodate. This lack of range is common to all magnetic field models tested. Although there are certainly cases where the models are not sufliciently stretched, we find that on average all magnetic field models tested are too stretched. This technique provides a n excellent opportunity for testing future magnetic field models and for determining the appropriate parameterizations for those models.

[1]  D. Mccomas,et al.  An examination of the Tsyganenko (T89a) field model using a database of two‐satellite magnetic conjunctions , 1997 .

[2]  Michelle F. Thomsen,et al.  An observational test of the Tsyganenko (T89a) model of the magnetospheric field , 1996 .

[3]  E. W. Hones,et al.  Observational determination of magnetic connectivity of the geosynchronous region of the magnetosphere to the auroral oval , 1996 .

[4]  R. Hilmer,et al.  A magnetospheric magnetic field model with flexible current systems driven by independent physical parameters , 1995 .

[5]  D. Baker,et al.  Thin current sheets in the magnetotail during substorms: CDAW 6 revisited , 1994 .

[6]  D. Stern,et al.  Are existing magnetospheric models excessively stretched , 1993 .

[7]  M. F. Thomsen,et al.  Magnetospheric plasma analyzer for spacecraft with constrained resources , 1993 .

[8]  D. Stern,et al.  On the position of the near-earth neutral sheet - A comparison of magnetic model predictions with empirical formulas , 1991 .

[9]  D. Fairfield.  An evaluation of the Tsyganenko Magnetic Field Model , 1991 .

[10]  T. L. Schumaker,et al.  The relationship between diffuse auroral and plasma sheet electron distributions near local midnight , 1989 .

[11]  Nikolai A. Tsyganenko,et al.  GLOBAL QUANTITATIVE MODELS OF THE GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD IN THE CISLUNAR MAGNETOSPHERE FOR DIFFERENT DISTURBANCE LEVELS , 1987 .

[12]  R. Lundin,et al.  Boundary layer plasmas as a source for high-latitude, early afternoon, auroral arcs , 1985 .

[13]  Nikolai A. Tsyganenko,et al.  Determination of the magnetospheric current system parameters and development of experimental geomagnetic field models based on data from IMP and HEOS satellites , 1982 .

[14]  B. Mauk,et al.  ELECTRON PRECIPITATION OF EVENING DIFFUSE AURORA AND ITS CONJUGATE ELECTRON FLUXES NEAR THE MAGNETOSPHERIC EQUATOR C.-I. Meng Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 , 1979 .

[15]  S. Mende,et al.  Coordinated ATS-5 electron flux and simultaneous auroral observations, appendix B. [of magnetic storms , 1975 .

[16]  W. P. Olson,et al.  A quantitative model of the magnetospheric magnetic field , 1974 .

[17]  D. L. Carr,et al.  Coordinated auroral‐electron observations from a synchronous and a polar satellite , 1971 .

[18]  N. Tsyganenko.  A magnetospheric magnetic field model with a warped tail current sheet , 1989 .

[19]  D. Hardy.  Precipitating electron and ion detectors (SSJ/4) for the block 5D/flights 6-10 DMSP satellites: calibration and data presentation , 1984 .