Options for the Interpretation of and Recommendations for Acting on Different PROMs in Daily Clinical Practice Using KLIK

Introduction: This paper describes the different ways in which information is being fed back to health care providers (HCPs) using the Dutch evidence-based KLIK Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) portal (www.hetklikt.nu). KLIK was initially developed for children with a chronic illness and their parents, and recently expanded for use in adult health care. Patients complete online PROMs at home about their health-related quality of life (HRQOL), symptoms and/or psychosocial functioning before an outpatient consultation with their HCP. PROMs are subsequently converted into an individual KLIK electronic (e)PROfile and discussed during the consultation to facilitate systematic attention for HRQOL. Methods for PRO Score Interpretation: KLIK includes a variety of different PROMs. The KLIK ePROfile initially consisted of literal representations of the individual PROM items in the European traffic light colors (red, orange, green) and only one graph. Over the years, the KLIK ePROfile evolved into a broader spectrum of feedback options; (1) literal representation of individual items, (2) summary scores, and (3) graphic representations (4 options). Developing Recommendations for Acting on PRO Results: The primary goal of KLIK is to longitudinally monitor patient and parent self-reported or proxy-reported health outcomes, which means that the focus of KLIK is not mainly on recommending actions for PRO results. However, there are several aids that help interpretation of the KLIK ePROfile and recommendations are given for actions based on PROM scores. The main aid is the KLIK training, which includes a theoretical and a practical part. In the training, 2 tools—a decision tree and a summary of information about the KLIK ePROfile—are given to the HCPs to assist them in using KLIK. Discussion: Customization of a PROM portal is needed for each different patient group and clinical setting. Because the KLIK website is flexible, every PROM (with good psychometric qualities and permission of the publisher) can be built in. However, implementing and feeding back PROMs in pediatric health care encompasses different challenges, because different versions of the same PROM are needed for children of different ages, as well as proxy and self-report versions.

[1]  Joanne Greenhalgh,et al.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations , 2012, Quality of Life Research.

[2]  J. B. van Goudoever,et al.  Implementation of electronic Patient Reported Outcomes in pediatric daily clinical practice: the KLIK experience , 2013 .

[3]  B. Anderson,et al.  Assessing diabetes‐related quality of life of youth with type 1 diabetes in routine clinical care: the MIND Youth Questionnaire (MY‐Q) , 2012, Pediatric diabetes.

[4]  Lotte Haverman,et al.  Effectiveness of a Web-Based Application to Monitor Health-Related Quality of Life , 2013, Pediatrics.

[5]  Lotte Haverman,et al.  Development and implementation of a patient reported outcome intervention (QLIC-ON PROfile) in clinical paediatric oncology practice. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[6]  S. Hilberink,et al.  'Skills for growing up': supporting autonomy in young people with kidney disease. , 2014, Journal of renal care.

[7]  H. Maurice‐Stam,et al.  Health related quality of life in Dutch young adults: psychometric properties of the PedsQL generic core scales young adult version , 2014, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[8]  David Feeny,et al.  Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice , 2015, Quality of Life Research.

[9]  A. Darlington,et al.  Development and validation of the distress thermometer for parents of a chronically ill child. , 2013, The Journal of pediatrics.

[10]  Lotte Haverman,et al.  Monitoring health-related quality of life in paediatric practice: development of an innovative web-based application , 2011, BMC pediatrics.

[11]  H. Heymans,et al.  Growing into disability benefits? Psychosocial course of life of young adults with a chronic somatic disease or disability , 2012, Acta paediatrica.

[12]  M. Grootenhuis,et al.  Dutch normative data and psychometric properties for the Distress Thermometer for Parents , 2016, Quality of Life Research.

[13]  R. Snaith,et al.  The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale , 1983 .

[14]  N. Young,et al.  Paediatric health-related quality of life: what is it and why should we measure it? , 2016, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[15]  L. LeBlanc,et al.  Behavioral aspects of chronic illness in children and adolescents. , 2003, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[16]  Michael Seid,et al.  The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. , 2003, Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association.

[17]  J. Ormel,et al.  A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects , 1997, Psychological Medicine.

[18]  Michel Wensing,et al.  Real‐world implementation of electronic patient‐reported outcomes in outpatient pediatric cancer care , 2017, Psycho-oncology.

[19]  M. M. Haentjens,et al.  Health related quality of life of Dutch children: psychometric properties of the PedsQL in the Netherlands , 2009, BMC pediatrics.

[20]  E. Verrips,et al.  Health-related quality of life problems of children aged 8–11 years with a chronic disease , 2007, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[21]  S. L. Goldstein,et al.  Pediatric Health‐Related Quality of Life: Feasibility, Reliability and Validity of the PedsQL™ Transplant Module , 2010, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[22]  H. Caron,et al.  Reporting health‐related quality of life scores to physicians during routine follow‐up visits of pediatric oncology patients: Is it effective? , 2012, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[23]  Thomas E. Elliott,et al.  User’s Guide to Implementing Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice , 2016 .

[24]  H Meltzer,et al.  Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample , 2003, International review of psychiatry.

[25]  H. Maurice‐Stam,et al.  Health related quality of life in Dutch infants, toddlers, and young children , 2017, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[26]  A. Griffiths,et al.  Development, validation, and evaluation of a pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index: a prospective multicenter study. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[27]  M. Grootenhuis,et al.  Psychosocial care for children with haemophilia and their parents in the Netherlands , 2017, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[28]  R. Goodman,et al.  Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) , 2003, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[29]  W. Hwang,et al.  The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0): psychometric properties of a screener for psychosocial distress in families of children newly diagnosed with cancer. , 2008, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[30]  J. Fries,et al.  Measurement of health status in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. , 1994, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[31]  W. Kuis,et al.  The Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ). , 2001, Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology.

[32]  C. Terwee,et al.  Dutch–Flemish translation of nine pediatric item banks from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)® , 2015, Quality of Life Research.

[33]  Kenworthy,et al.  Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) , 2020, A Compendium of Tests, Scales and Questionnaires.