Editors' Introduction

Not since the publication of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring (1962) has a book about the environment provoked such controversy as Bjorn Lomborg's The Skeptical Environmen-talist (2001). In the four decades since Silent Spring a popular environmental awareness and suspicion of ''chemicals'' and other aspects of modern industrial life has increasingly challenged and, in some cases, displaced scientific and technological optimism as an orthodox view throughout most of the industrialized world. A proliferation of nongovern-mental organizations and scientific bodies repeatedly invoke science to warn us of the potential for irreversible and, possibly, catastrophic environmental decline, unless people on the planet mend their ways. Powerful interests resist this message, increasingly by attacking the science that informs it. In this context, it may seem unsurprising that Lomborg's challenge to contemporary catastrophic views of inexorable global environmental decline has itself attracted criticism from environmentalists. Perhaps what is surprising are the amount of attention, the degree of opprobrium, and the ad hominem nature of the criticism that has been launched at Lomborg for a book that builds upon a tradition of similar arguments. Indeed the central theme of TSE, that some combination of business-as-usual and incremental change will be sufficient for children born today to ''get more food, a better education, a higher standard of living, more leisure time and far more possibi-lities—without the global environment being destroyed'', seems a relatively modest assertion of the cornucopian world view by comparison with some of Lomborg's predecessors, such as deconstructions of environmental concerns over the preceding decade including Ron Bailey's Ecoscam (1993) and Aaron Wildavsky's But is it True? (1995) provoked few serious rebuttals from scientists or environmental activists. The controversy over TSE serves to remind us of the anthropological observation that science is the trump card that we play in disputes about values. In our contemporary society, science has become the medium through which we understand nature. However, science has also become the medium through which we wage political battles not just on the environment, but also over many other contested issues. Hence, the debate over TSE provides a rich case study through which to examine issues associated with the relationships among science, policy, and politics, which observers on the right (e.g., Gough, 2003) and left (e.g., UCS, 2004) of the US political spectrum agree is a critical area for governance. The five papers that comprise this special issue were originally solicited for a symposium titled …