Emotional Experiences and Motivating Factors Associated with Fingerprint Analysis

Abstract:  In this study, we investigated the emotional and motivational factors involved in fingerprint analysis in day‐to‐day routine case work and in significant and harrowing criminal investigations. Thematic analysis was performed on interviews with 13 experienced fingerprint examiners from a variety of law enforcement agencies. The data revealed factors relating to job satisfaction and the use of skill. Individual satisfaction related to catching criminals was observed; this was most notable in solving high profile, serious, or long‐running cases. There were positive emotional effects associated with matching fingerprints and apparent fear of making errors. Finally, we found evidence for a need of cognitive closure in fingerprint examiner decision‐making.

[1]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[2]  S. Kassin.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CONFESSION EVIDENCE , 1997 .

[3]  David Charlton,et al.  Why Experts Make Errors , 2006 .

[4]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[5]  Michele Triplett,et al.  The Etiology of ACE-V and its Proper Use: An Exploration of the Relationship Between ACE-V and the Scientific Method of Hypothesis Testing , 2006 .

[6]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[7]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Decision making under time pressure: An independent test of sequential sampling models , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Brandon L. Garrett,et al.  Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community , 2007 .

[9]  H. Ten Have,et al.  Decision-making in palliative care practice and the need for moral deliberation: a qualitative study. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[10]  I. Dror,et al.  Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[11]  I. Dror,et al.  When emotions get the better of us: the effect of contextual top‐down processing on matching fingerprints , 2005 .

[12]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  Emotional state and the detection of change in facial expression of emotion , 2000 .

[13]  Jim Mitchell.  Applied Qualitative Research , 2007 .

[14]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Offloading Cognition onto Cognitive Technology , 2008, ArXiv.

[15]  S. Harnad,et al.  Cognition distributed : how cognitive technology extends our minds , 2008 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[17]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[18]  W. Grove.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[19]  Arie W Kruglanski,et al.  Groups as epistemic providers: need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. , 2006, Psychological review.

[20]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[21]  L. Yardley,et al.  Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology , 2003 .

[22]  Itiel E. Dror,et al.  Cognitive biases in human perception, judgment, and decision making: Bridging theory and the real world , 2008 .

[23]  J. Koehler,et al.  The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science , 2005, Science.

[24]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Content and thematic analysis , 2003 .

[25]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[26]  N. Britten.  Qualitative Research: Qualitative interviews in medical research , 1995 .

[27]  P. Granhag,et al.  Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: the need for cognitive closure , 2005 .

[28]  Siomon A. Cole,et al.  More than Zero: Accounting for Error in Latent Fingerprint Identification , 2007 .

[29]  David R. Ashbaugh,et al.  Quantitative-Qualitative Friction Ridge Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Ridgeology , 1999 .

[30]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[31]  T. Pincus,et al.  Pain patients' bias in the interpretation of ambiguous homophones. , 1996, The British journal of medical psychology.