Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study.

INTRODUCTION Our objectives were to determine the validity and reproducibility of measurements on stereolithographic models and 3-dimensional digital dental models made with an intraoral scanner. METHODS Ten dry human skulls were scanned; from the scans, stereolithographic models and digital models were made. Two observers measured transversal distances, mesiodistal tooth widths, and arch segments on the skulls and the stereolithographic and digital models. All measurements were repeated 4 times. Arch length discrepancy and tooth size discrepancy were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed by using paired t tests. RESULTS For the measurements on the stereolithographic and digital models, statistically significant differences were found. However, these differences were considered to be clinically insignificant. Digital models had fewer statistically significant differences and generally the smallest duplicate measurement errors compared with the stereolithographic models. CONCLUSIONS Stereolithographic and digital models made with an intraoral scanner are a valid and reproducible method for measuring distances in a dentition.

[1]  M. Goonewardene,et al.  Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models. , 2008, Australian orthodontic journal.

[2]  Thomas J Cangialosi,et al.  Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  U Hägg,et al.  Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. , 2010, European journal of orthodontics.

[4]  Manuel O Lagravère,et al.  Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. , 2009, Brazilian oral research.

[5]  Wayne A. Bolton,et al.  Disharmony In Tooth Size And Its Relation To The Analysis And Treatment Of Malocclusion , 2009 .

[6]  A. Jacobson,et al.  An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  Thomas J Cangialosi,et al.  Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  Paul W Major,et al.  Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  James R. Miller,et al.  Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  D Yourtee,et al.  Stereolithographic models of biopolymers. , 2000, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[11]  D. Hatcher,et al.  Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[12]  J. Fischer,et al.  A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[13]  Drew W Fallis,et al.  Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  Jeremy Knox,et al.  A Comparison of Plaster, Digital and Reconstructed Study Model Accuracy , 2008, Journal of orthodontics.

[15]  K. Vig,et al.  Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  A. Johal,et al.  Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. , 2011, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.