Distributed coordination maximization over networks: a stochastic approximation approach

In various online/offline networked environments, it is very popular that the system can benefit from coordinating actions of two interacting nodes, but incur some cost due to such coordination. Examples include a wireless sensor networks with duty cycling, where a sensor node consumes a certain amount of energy when it is awake, but a coordinated operation of sensors enables some meaningful tasks, e.g., sensed data forwarding, collaborative sensing of a phenomenon, or efficient decision of further sensing actions. In this paper, we formulate an optimization problem that captures the amount of coordination gain at the cost of node activation over networks. This problem is challenging since the target utility is a function of the long-term time portion of the inter-coupled activations of two adjacent nodes, and thus a standard Lagrange duality theory is hard to apply to obtain a distributed decomposition as in the standard NUM (Network Utility Maximization). We propose a fully-distributed algorithm that requires only one-hop message passing. Our approach is inspired by a control of Ising model in statistical physics, and the proposed algorithm is motivated by a stochastic approximation method that runs a Markov chain incompletely over time, but provably guarantees its convergence to the optimal solution. We validate our theoretical findings on convergence and optimality through extensive simulations under various scenarios.

[1]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  A Distributed CSMA Algorithm for Throughput and Utility Maximization in Wireless Networks , 2010, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[2]  V. Climenhaga Markov chains and mixing times , 2013 .

[3]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Towards utility-optimal random access without message passing , 2010, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[4]  Daniel Pérez Palomar,et al.  A tutorial on decomposition methods for network utility maximization , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  E. Ising Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus , 1925 .

[7]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Scalable Coordination for Wireless Sensor Networks: Self-Configuring Localization Systems , 2001 .

[8]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  Span: An Energy-Efficient Coordination Algorithm for Topology Maintenance in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[9]  Martin S. Kochmanski NOTE ON THE E. ISING'S PAPER ,,BEITRAG ZUR THEORIE DES FERROMAGNETISMUS" (Zs. Physik, 31, 253 (1925)) , 2008 .

[10]  Yongbin Wei,et al.  Coordinated downlink multi-point communications in heterogeneous cellular networks , 2012, 2012 Information Theory and Applications Workshop.

[11]  Jian Ni,et al.  Q-CSMA: Queue-Length-Based CSMA/CA Algorithms for Achieving Maximum Throughput and Low Delay in Wireless Networks , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[12]  Reinaldo A. Valenzuela,et al.  Network coordination for spectrally efficient communications in cellular systems , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[13]  Jinwoo Shin,et al.  On maximizing diffusion speed in social networks: impact of random seeding and clustering , 2014, SIGMETRICS '14.

[14]  Alexandre Proutière,et al.  Resource Allocation over Network Dynamics without Timescale Separation , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[15]  Herrmann,et al.  Dynamics of spreading phenomena in two-dimensional Ising models. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[16]  Jacek Dziarmaga,et al.  Dynamics of a quantum phase transition: exact solution of the quantum Ising model. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[17]  Na Li,et al.  Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[18]  Satoshi Nagata,et al.  Coordinated multipoint transmission and reception in LTE-advanced: deployment scenarios and operational challenges , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[19]  Devavrat Shah,et al.  Network adiabatic theorem: an efficient randomized protocol for contention resolution , 2009, SIGMETRICS '09.

[20]  E. M. Opdam,et al.  The two-dimensional Ising model , 2018, From Quarks to Pions.

[21]  M. T. Wasan Stochastic Approximation , 1969 .

[22]  Ryogo Kubo,et al.  Dynamics of the Ising Model near the Critical Point. I , 1968 .

[23]  Rong Yan,et al.  Social influence in social advertising: evidence from field experiments , 2012, EC '12.

[24]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[25]  Vivek S. Borkar,et al.  Stochastic approximation with 'controlled Markov' noise , 2006, Systems & control letters (Print).

[26]  F. Downton Stochastic Approximation , 1969, Nature.

[27]  Wenpin Tsai Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[28]  Santiago L. Rovere,et al.  Ising-like agent-based technology diffusion model: adoption patterns vs. seeding strategies , 2010, ArXiv.

[29]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  The spread of innovations in social networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.