Characterisation and fractioning of Tectona grandis bark in view of its valorisation as a biorefinery raw-material

[1]  H. Pereira,et al.  Bark anatomy and cell size variation in Quercus faginea , 2013, Turkish Journal of Botany.

[2]  H. Pereira,et al.  Growth rate and ring width variability of teak, Tectona grandis (Verbenaceae) in an unmanaged forest in East Timor. , 2012, Revista de biologia tropical.

[3]  H. Beeckman,et al.  Fluctuations of cambial activity in relation to precipitation result in annual rings and intra-annual growth zones of xylem and phloem in teak (Tectona grandis) in Ivory Coast. , 2012, Annals of botany.

[4]  J. Gominho,et al.  Chemical characterization of barks from Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris after fractioning into different particle sizes , 2012 .

[5]  H. Pereira,et al.  Wood properties of teak (Tectona grandis) from a mature unmanaged stand in East Timor , 2011, Journal of Wood Science.

[6]  H. Pereira,et al.  Bark anatomy of Quercus cerris L. var. cerris from Turkey , 2011, Turkish Journal of Botany.

[7]  S. G. Shankar,et al.  Comparative pharmacognostic studies on the barks of four Ficus species , 2010 .

[8]  Giuseppe Mazza,et al.  Measurement of structural carbohydrates, lignins, and micro-components of straw and shives: Effects of extractives, particle size and crop species , 2010 .

[9]  J. R. Hess,et al.  Preprocessing Moist Lignocellulosic Biomass for Biorefinery Feedstocks , 2009 .

[10]  G. Vázquez,et al.  Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of chestnut (Castanea sativa) shell and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) bark extracts , 2008 .

[11]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  Bulk Density of Wet and Dry Wheat Straw and Switchgrass Particles , 2008 .

[12]  R. C. Baldwin,et al.  The Relationship Of Extractive Content To Particle Size Distribution In Milled Yellow-Poplar ( Liriodendron Tulipifera L.) Bark , 2007 .

[13]  B. Dale,et al.  Effect of particle size based separation of milled corn stover on AFEX pretreatment and enzymatic digestibility , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  D. Ghosh.  Bark is the hallmark , 2006 .

[15]  R. Evert.  Esau's Plant Anatomy,: Meristems, Cells And Tissues Of The Plant Body- Their Structure, Function And Development , 2005 .

[16]  Helena Pereira,et al.  Wood Chemistry in Relation to Quality , 2004 .

[17]  G. Vázquez,et al.  Characteristics of Pinus pinaster bark extracts obtained under various extraction conditions , 2001, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[18]  Charles E. Wyman,et al.  BIOMASS ETHANOL: Technical Progress, Opportunities, and Commercial Challenges , 1999 .

[19]  H. Kofujita,et al.  Characterization of the major components in bark from five Japanese tree species for chemical utilization , 1999, Wood Science and Technology.

[20]  R. M. Khan,et al.  5‐Hydroxylapachol: A Cytotoxic Agent from Tectona grandis. , 1999 .

[21]  D. Hon,et al.  Wood and Cellulosic Chemistry , 1990 .

[22]  H. Pereira,et al.  Chemical composition and variability of cork from Quercus suber L. , 1988, Wood Science and Technology.

[23]  J. Gominho,et al.  Fractioning and chemical characterization of barks of Betula pendula and Eucalyptus globulus. , 2013 .

[24]  G. Krishnamohan,et al.  Antimitotic Activity and Brine Shrimp Lethality Test of Tectona grandis Linn. Bark , 2011 .

[25]  J. Akhtar,et al.  A review on phytochemical and pharmacological investigations of miswak (Salvadora persica Linn) , 2011, Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences.

[26]  A. Modi,et al.  PHARMACOGNOSTIC AND PHYTOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF STEM BARK OF Tectona grandis Linn. , 2010 .

[27]  Klein E. Ileleji,et al.  Morphological Properties and Breakage Behavior of Three Ground Biofeedstocks by Hammermilling , 2009 .

[28]  H. Pereira,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TREE SHELTER ON THE STEM ANATOMY OF CORK OAK (QUERCUS SUBER) PLANTS , 2003 .

[29]  H. Pereira,et al.  Variability of bark structure in plantation-grown Eucalyptus globulus , 1999 .

[30]  K. Rajput,et al.  Seasonal Behaviour of Vascular Cambium in Teak (Tectona Grandis) Growing in Moist Deciduous and Dry Deciduous Forests , 1999 .

[31]  K. Rajput,et al.  SEASONAL ANATOMY OF SECONDARY PHLOEM OF TEAK (TECTONA GRANDIS L. VERBENACEAE) GROWING IN DRY AND MOIST DECIDUOUS FORESTS , 1998 .

[32]  C. R. Marcati,et al.  Comparative Bark Anatomy of Root and Stem in Styrax Camporum (Styracaceae) , 1997 .

[33]  K. Rajput,et al.  Occurrence of Sieve Elements in Phloem Rays , 1997 .

[34]  K. White.  Teak: some aspects of research and development. , 1991 .

[35]  T. Furuno.  Bark Structure of Deciduous Broad-Leaved Trees Grown in the San'in Region, Japan , 1990 .

[36]  Michael Trockenbrodt,et al.  Survey and discussion of the terminology used in bark anatomy. , 1990 .

[37]  I. Roth,et al.  Structural patterns of tropical barks , 1981 .

[38]  H. Gottwald,et al.  Anatomy of wood and bark of Tectona (Verbenaceae) in relation to taxonomy. , 1980 .

[39]  P. L. Soni,et al.  Utilisation of teak (Tectona grandis) bark - Production of pulp for wrapping paper and cellulose derivatives. , 1980 .

[40]  J. Lawton,et al.  SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN THE SECONDARY PHLOEM OF SOME FOREST TREES FROM NIGERIA , 1971 .

[41]  J. Harkin,et al.  Bark And Its Possible Uses , 1971 .

[42]  R. N. Chopra,et al.  Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plants , 1956 .