The field line map approach for simulations of magnetically confined plasmas

In the presented field line map approach the simulation domain of a tokamak is covered with a cylindrical grid, which is Cartesian within poloidal planes. Standard finite-difference methods can be used for the discretisation of perpendicular (w.r.t.~magnetic field lines) operators. The characteristic flute mode property $\left(k_{\parallel}\ll k_{\perp}\right)$ of structures is exploited computationally by a grid sparsification in the toroidal direction. A field line following discretisation of parallel operators is then required, which is achieved via a finite difference along magnetic field lines. This includes field line tracing and interpolation or integration. The main emphasis of this paper is on the discretisation of the parallel diffusion operator. Based on the support operator method a scheme is constructed which exhibits only very low numerical perpendicular diffusion. The schemes are implemented in the new code GRILLIX, and extensive benchmarks are presented which show the validity of the approach in general and GRILLIX in particular. The main advantage of the approach is that it does not rely on field/flux-aligned, which become singular on the separatrix/X-point. Most tokamaks are based on the divertor concept, and the numerical treatment of the separatrix is therefore of importance for simulations of the edge and scrape-off layer.

[1]  Sibylle Günter,et al.  Modelling of heat transport in magnetised plasmas using non-aligned coordinates , 2005 .

[2]  M. Ottaviani,et al.  A Singularity-Free Coordinate System for X-point Geometries , 2014, 1406.3489.

[3]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  M. Ottaviani,et al.  The flux-coordinate independent approach applied to X-point geometries , 2014 .

[5]  M. Shashkov Conservative Finite-Difference Methods on General Grids , 1996 .

[6]  Marcel Bauer,et al.  Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations , 1994 .

[7]  P. J. Mc Carthy,et al.  Analytical solutions to the Grad–Shafranov equation for tokamak equilibrium with dissimilar source functions , 1999 .

[8]  M. Ottaviani,et al.  A flux-coordinate independent field-aligned approach to plasma turbulence simulations , 2013, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[9]  D. P. Coster,et al.  Numerical Methods for 3D Tokamak Simulations Using a Flux-Surface Independent Grid , 2014 .

[10]  M. Shashkov,et al.  Support-operator finite-difference algorithms for general elliptic problems , 1995 .

[11]  Conformal Tokamak Geometry for Turbulence Computations , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[12]  P. C. Stangeby,et al.  Plasma boundary phenomena in tokamaks , 1990 .

[13]  W. A. Wrate Recent and current developments in electric arc welding , 1960 .

[14]  J. Hobirk,et al.  Numerical investigations of axisymmetric equilibria with current holes , 2004 .

[15]  Sibylle Günter,et al.  Finite element and higher order difference formulations for modelling heat transport in magnetised plasmas , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  P. Rebut,et al.  The ITER divertor , 1993, 15th IEEE/NPSS Symposium. Fusion Engineering.

[17]  W. D’haeseleer,et al.  Flux Coordinates and Magnetic Field Structure , 1991 .

[18]  X. Xu,et al.  BOUT++: Recent and current developments , 2014, Journal of Plasma Physics.

[19]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[20]  M. Ottaviani,et al.  An alternative approach to field-aligned coordinates for plasma turbulence simulations , 2010, 1002.0748.

[21]  J. M. Zerzan,et al.  OVERLAP: a FORTRAN program for rapidly evaluating the area of overlap between two polygons , 1989 .

[22]  H. R. Strauss,et al.  Edge‐localized mode simulations in divertor tokamaks , 1996 .

[23]  Daniela Farina,et al.  Effect of the magnetic field geometry on the flute-like perturbations near the divertor X point , 1993 .