Assessment of Noise Exposure for Indoor and Outdoor Firing Ranges

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) received an employee request for a health hazard evaluation of a Special Weapons Assault Team (SWAT) in January 2002. The department was concerned about noise exposures and potential hearing damage from weapons training on their indoor and outdoor firing ranges. NIOSH investigators conducted noise sampling with an acoustic mannequin head and 1/4 -inch microphone to characterize the noise exposures that officers might experience during small arms qualification and training when wearing a variety of hearing protection devices provided by the department. The peak sound pressure levels for the various weapons ranged from 156 to 170 decibels (dB SPL), which are greater than the recommended allowable 140 dB SPL exposure guideline from NIOSH. The earplugs, ear muffs, and customized SWAT team hearing protectors provided between 25 and 35 dB of peak reduction. Double hearing protection (plugs plus muffs) added 15–20 dB of peak reduction.

[1]  Karl D. Kryter,et al.  The Handbook of Hearing and the Effects of Noise: Physiology, Psychology, and Public Health , 1994 .

[2]  Daniel L. Johnson.  New Auditory Damage Risk Criteria and Standard for Impulse Noise , 2000 .

[3]  E. Dixon,et al.  The Immigration and Naturalization Service , 1990 .

[4]  D Henderson,et al.  Individual Susceptibility to Noise‐Induced Hearing loss: An Old Topic Revisited , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[5]  G. Fleischer,et al.  On the Relation Between Exposure to Sound and Auditory Performance , 2005 .

[6]  R Chatham.  Theoretical determination of damage risk criteria for impulse noise. , 1985, Engineering in medicine.

[7]  K. L. Michael.  50. Comprehensive Use of Hearing Protectors: Integration of Training, Field Monitoring, Communication, and Documentation , 1999 .

[8]  E. Borg,et al.  Protection against noise trauma by pre-exposure to a low level acoustic stimulus , 1988, Hearing Research.

[9]  Georges R. Garinther,et al.  Criteria for Assessing Hearing Damage Risk from Impulse‐Noise Exposure , 1969 .

[10]  J. Stoker,et al.  The Department of Health and Human Services. , 1999, Home healthcare nurse.

[11]  J R Franks,et al.  Hearing loss in the chinchilla from impact and continuous noise exposure. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Dan Gauger,et al.  Hearing protection: surpassing the limits to attenuation imposed by the bone-conduction pathways. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Rena H. Glaser,et al.  Preventing Occupational Hearing Loss-A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[14]  Chucri A Kardous,et al.  Noise exposure assessment and abatement strategies at an indoor firing range. , 2003, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[15]  R. J. Perry.  From World War II to the Present , 2007 .

[16]  J T Kalb,et al.  Insights into hazard from intense impulses from a mathematical model of the ear. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  John R Franks,et al.  Hearing protector attenuation: models of attenuation distributions. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Roger P. Hamernik,et al.  Auditory Hazards of Impulse and Impact Noise , 2008 .

[19]  Richard L. McKinley.  Communication and Localization with Hearing Protectors , 2000 .

[20]  J R Franks,et al.  Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  F Pfander,et al.  Danger of auditory impairment from impulse noise: A comparative study of the CHABA damage-risk criteria and those of the Federal Republic of Germany. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.