Virus-traffic coupled dynamic model for virus propagation in vehicle-to-vehicle communication networks

Abstract With the development of connected vehicle technology, virus propagation that exists in a traditional network environment will gradually penetrate vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication networks, thus posing a serious threat to the security of intelligent transportation systems (ITS). Understanding the characteristics of virus propagation through space and time is the key to ensuring the safety of ITS. However, most existing studies on virus propagation have ignored the dynamic relationship between virus transmission and traffic flow based on the assumption that the probability of virus infection is a constant. In light of this, this study proposes a two-layer model, called the virus-traffic coupled dynamic model, to investigate virus propagation in V2V communication networks. First, the dynamics of traffic flow and vehicular mobility are formulated as many update rules between cellular automata in the lower layer; then, due to the similarity between biological epidemic dissemination and virus propagation, an epidemic model called the susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) was built to model the virus propagation process in the upper layer; finally, the lower and upper layer are connected by the probability of virus infection. Numerical experiments show that the model can accurately reproduce the process of virus transmission over space and time. The experiments also prove that reducing the probability of virus infection can constrain the spread of the virus effectively for both different communication range limits and various traffic densities.

[1]  Nirwan Ansari,et al.  Anti-virus in-the-cloud service: are we ready for the security evolution? , 2012, Secur. Commun. Networks.

[2]  Bart van Arem,et al.  The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Dipak Ghosal,et al.  Security vulnerabilities of connected vehicle streams and their impact on cooperative driving , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Xinkai Wu,et al.  An extended car-following model to describe connected traffic dynamics under cyberattacks , 2017 .

[5]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Network-Aware Analysis of String Stability , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Srinivas Peeta,et al.  Macroscopic Modeling of Spatiotemporal Information Flow Propagation Wave under Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[8]  Luis Alvarez-Icaza,et al.  Cellular automaton model for traffic flow based on safe driving policies and human reactions , 2010 .

[9]  Velanganny Cyrilraj,et al.  A vehicle control system using a time synchronized Hybrid VANET to reduce road accidents caused by human error , 2016, Veh. Commun..

[10]  Xindong Wu,et al.  Predicting Long-Term Trajectories of Connected Vehicles via the Prefix-Projection Technique , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Theory and Applications of Cellular Automata , 1986 .

[12]  M. Fukui,et al.  Traffic Flow in 1D Cellular Automaton Model Including Cars Moving with High Speed , 1996 .

[13]  Insup Lee,et al.  Sensor attack detection in the presence of transient faults , 2015, ICCPS.

[14]  Lili Du,et al.  Information Dissemination Delay in Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Networks in a Traffic Stream , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[15]  D. Helbing,et al.  The Hidden Geometry of Complex, Network-Driven Contagion Phenomena , 2013, Science.

[16]  Subir Biswas,et al.  Vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication protocols for enhancing highway traffic safety , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Technological Networks and the Spread of Computer Viruses , 2004, Science.

[18]  Srinivas Peeta,et al.  Graph-Based Modeling of Information Flow Evolution and Propagation under V2V Communications-Based Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 2016, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[19]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding the Spreading Patterns of Mobile Phone Viruses , 2009, Science.

[20]  S. Travis Waller,et al.  A static network level model for the information propagation in vehicular ad hoc networks , 2010 .

[21]  Bruno Crispo,et al.  Security and privacy in vehicular communications: Challenges and opportunities , 2017, Veh. Commun..

[22]  Sunilkumar S. Manvi,et al.  A survey on authentication schemes in VANETs for secured communication , 2017, Veh. Commun..

[23]  Salima Hassas,et al.  Cooperative highway traffic: multi-agent modeling and robustness assessment to local perturbations , 2013 .

[24]  Mostafa Kaveh,et al.  Exact symbol error probability of a Cooperative network in a Rayleigh-fading environment , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[25]  Jennie Lioris,et al.  Platoons of connected vehicles can double throughput in urban roads , 2015, 1511.00775.

[26]  Marco Fiore,et al.  Worm Epidemics in Vehicular Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[27]  Nirwan Ansari,et al.  Revealing Packed Malware , 2008, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[28]  Izhak Rubin,et al.  Heterogeneous cellular and DSRC networking for Floating Car Data collection in urban areas , 2017, Veh. Commun..

[29]  Jian Wang,et al.  Analytical model for information flow propagation wave under an information relay control strategy in a congested vehicle-to-vehicle communication environment , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[30]  Pratap Kumar Sahu,et al.  Dynamic spatial partition density-based emergency message dissemination in VANETs , 2015, Veh. Commun..

[31]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  Information-traffic coupled cell transmission model for information spreading dynamics over vehicular ad hoc network on road segments , 2016 .

[32]  R. Anderson,et al.  Contact rate calculation for a basic epidemic model. , 2008, Mathematical biosciences.

[33]  Tadashi Dohi,et al.  Markovian modeling and analysis of Internet worm propagation , 2005, 16th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE'05).

[34]  Hao Wu,et al.  Efficiency of Simulated Vehicle-to-Vehicle Message Propagation in Atlanta, Georgia, I-75 Corridor , 2005 .

[35]  Chuanyi Ji,et al.  Spatial-temporal modeling of malware propagation in networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[36]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Creating complex congestion patterns via multi-objective optimal freeway traffic control with application to cyber-security , 2016 .

[37]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Connectivity Statistics of Store-and-Forward Intervehicle Communication , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[38]  Grigorios Kalivas,et al.  MIMO HetNet IEEE 802.11p-LTE deployment in a vehicular urban environment , 2017, Veh. Commun..

[39]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[40]  B. Sklar,et al.  Rayleigh fading channels in mobile digital communication systems Part I: Characterization , 1997, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[41]  Insup Lee,et al.  Attack-Resilient Sensor Fusion for Safety-Critical Cyber-Physical Systems , 2016, ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst..

[42]  Xu Yang,et al.  Simulation studies of information propagation in a self-organizing distributed traffic information system , 2005 .

[43]  Sheng Hong,et al.  Epidemic spreading model of complex dynamical network with the heterogeneity of nodes , 2016, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[44]  Michael Schreckenberg,et al.  A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic , 1992 .