Multiple Object Tracking in People With Williams Syndrome and in Normally Developing Children

Multiple object tracking is hypothesized to utilize visual indexes, which may provide rapid, parallel access to a limited number of visual objects, thereby supporting a variety of spatial tasks. We examined whether faulty indexing might play a role in the severe visuospatial deficits found in Williams syndrome. We asked observers to track from one to four targets in a display of eight identical objects. Objects remained stationary (static condition) or moved randomly and independently (moving condition) for 6 s, after which observers pointed to the objects they thought were targets. People with Williams syndrome were impaired in the moving condition, but not the static condition, compared with mental-age-matched control participants. Normal children who were younger than the mental-age-matched control children did not show the same profile as individuals with Williams syndrome, which suggests that the difference between the tasks in Williams syndrome did not reflect simple developmental immaturity. Error analysis revealed that all groups had “slippery” indexes, falsely identifying target neighbors, and further suggested that people with Williams syndrome deploy fewer indexes than do people without this disorder.

[1]  L. Frank The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[2]  S. Ullman Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[3]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[4]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Principles of Object Perception , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  S. Yantis Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Addition and subtraction by human infants , 1992, Nature.

[7]  L. Hildman,et al.  Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test , 1993 .

[8]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993 .

[10]  Patricia Spallone,et al.  Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndrome , 1993, Nature Genetics.

[11]  O. Braddick,et al.  A specific deficit of dorsal stream function in Williams' syndrome , 1997, Neuroreport.

[12]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Embodiment is the foundation, not a level , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  A. Karmiloff-Smith Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Indexing and the object concept: developing `what' and `where' systems , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  P. Howlin,et al.  Cognitive functioning in adults with Williams syndrome. , 1998, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[17]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking Multiple Items Through Occlusion: Clues to Visual Objecthood , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Carolyn B. Mervis,et al.  The Williams Syndrome Cognitive Profile , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  Stephan Eliez,et al.  IV. Neuroanatomy of Williams Syndrome: A High-Resolution MRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Situating vision in the world , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  I. The Neurocognitive Profile of Williams Syndrome: A Complex Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Susan Carey,et al.  Infants' knowledge of objects: beyond object files and object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[23]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  Face and place processing in Williams syndrome: evidence for a dorsal-ventral dissociation , 2002, Neuroreport.

[24]  C. Bearden,et al.  Williams syndrome cognitive profile also characterizes Velocardiofacial/DiGeorge syndrome. , 2002, American journal of medical genetics.

[25]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Intact Perception of Biological Motion in the Face of Profound Spatial Deficits: Williams Syndrome , 2002, Psychological science.

[26]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Spatial breakdown in spatial construction: Evidence from eye fixations in children with Williams syndrome , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  B. Scholl,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article ATTENTIVE TRACKING OF OBJECTS VERSUS SUBSTANCES , 2022 .

[28]  H. Tager-Flusberg,et al.  People with Williams syndrome process faces holistically , 2003, Cognition.

[29]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  What makes counting count? Verbal and visuo-spatial contributions to typical and atypical number development. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[30]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  A cognitive characterization of dyscalculia in Turner syndrome , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  C. Mervis,et al.  Neural Basis of Genetically Determined Visuospatial Construction Deficit in Williams Syndrome , 2004, Neuron.

[32]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Multimodal events and moving locations: eye movements of adults and 6-month-olds reveal dynamic spatial indexing. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Z. Pylyshyn Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities , 2004 .

[34]  Tony J. Simon,et al.  Visuospatial and Numerical Cognitive Deficits in Children with Chromosome 22Q11.2 Deletion Syndrome , 2005, Cortex.

[35]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Object recognition with severe spatial deficits in Williams syndrome: sparing and breakdown , 2006, Cognition.

[36]  Z. Pylyshyn Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking (MOT): II. Inhibition of moving nontargets , 2006 .