Structure of the Entrainment Zone Capping the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer

The authors use large-eddy simulation (LES) to investigate entrainment and structure of the inversion layer of a clear convectively driven planetary boundary layer (PBL) over a range of bulk Richardson numbers, Ri. The LES code uses a nested grid technique to achieve fine resolution in all three directions in the inversion layer. Extensive flow visualization is used to examine the structure of the inversion layer and to illustrate the temporal and spatial interaction of a thermal plume and the overlying inversion. It is found that coherent structures in the convective PBL, that is, thermal plumes, are primary instigators of entrainment in the Ri range 13.6 # Ri # 43.8. At Ri 5 13.6, strong horizontal and downward velocities are generated near the inversion layer because of the plume‐interface interaction. This leads to folding of the interface and hence entrainment of warm inversion air at the plume’s edge. At Ri 5 34.5, the inversion’s strong stability prevents folding of the interface but strong horizontal and downward motions near the plume’s edge pull down pockets of warm air below the nominal inversion height. These pockets of warm air are then scoured off by turbulent motions and entrained into the PBL. The structure of the inversion interface from LES is in good visual agreement with lidar measurements in the PBL obtained during the Lidars in Flat Terrain field experiment. A quadrant analysis of the buoyancy flux shows that net entrainment flux (or average minimum buoyancy flux wu min) is identified with quadrant IV w2u1 , 0 motions, that is, warm air moving downward. Plumes generate both large negative quadrant II w1u2 , 0 and positive quadrant III w2u2 . 0 buoyancy fluxes that tend to cancel. The maximum vertical gradient in potential temperature at every (x, y) grid point is used to define a local PBL height, zi(x, y). A statistical analysis of zi shows that skewness of zi depends on the inversion strength. Spectra of zi exhibit a sensitivity to grid resolution. The normalized entrainment rate we/w * , where we and w * are entrainment and convective velocities, varies as ARi21 with A 0.2 in the range 13.6 # Ri # 43.8 and is in good agreement with convection tank measurements. For a clear convective PBL, the authors found that the finite thickness of the inversion layer needs to be considered in an entrainment rate parameterization derived from a jump condition.

[1]  A. Speranskaya,et al.  Boundary layers and turbulence , 1999 .

[2]  P. Duynkerke,et al.  Entrainment Parameterization in Convective Boundary Layers , 1999 .

[3]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Effects of resolution on the simulation of stratocumulus entrainment , 1999 .

[4]  C. Grund,et al.  The Lidars in Flat Terrain (LIFT) Experiment , 1998 .

[5]  R. Breidenthal,et al.  Laboratory simulations of radiatively induced entrainment in stratiform clouds , 1998 .

[6]  H. Fernando,et al.  Measurement of turbulence near shear-free density interfaces , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  J. McWilliams,et al.  Langmuir turbulence in the ocean , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  T. Weckwerth,et al.  Lidars In Flat Terrain (LIFT) project overview [presentation] , 1997 .

[9]  Z. Sorbjan Effects Caused by Varying the Strength of the Capping Inversion Based on a Large Eddy Simulation Model of the Shear-Free Convective Boundary Layer , 1996 .

[10]  J. McWilliams,et al.  A grid nesting method for large-eddy simulation of planetary boundary-layer flows , 1996 .

[11]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  An evaluation of neutral and convective planetary boundary-layer parameterizations relative to large eddy simulations , 1996 .

[12]  C. Bretherton,et al.  An intercomparison of radiatively driven entrainment and turbulence in a smoke cloud, as simulated by different numerical models , 1996 .

[13]  B. Koren,et al.  Large-eddy simulation with accurate implicit subgrid-scale diffusion , 1996 .

[14]  H. G. Schreiber,et al.  Airborne observations of the boundary layer top, and associated gravity waves and boundary layer structure , 1995 .

[15]  J. McWilliams,et al.  A subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of planetary boundary-layer flows , 1994 .

[16]  H. Fernando,et al.  Turbulent mixing at an inversion layer , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  P. Sullivan,et al.  A Comparison of Shear- and Buoyancy-Driven Planetary Boundary Layer Flows , 1994 .

[18]  Barry Koren,et al.  A robust upwind discretization method for advection, diffusion and source terms , 1993 .

[19]  Larry Mahrt,et al.  Eddy Asymmetry in the Sheared Heated Boundary Layer , 1991 .

[20]  Harindra J. S. Fernando,et al.  TURBULENT MIXING IN STRATIFIED FLUIDS , 1991 .

[21]  John C. Wyngaard,et al.  Evaluation of turbulent transport and dissipation closures in second-order modeling , 1989 .

[22]  Ulrich Schumann,et al.  Coherent structure of the convective boundary layer derived from large-eddy simulations , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  T. Clark,et al.  Three‐dimensional numerical experiments on convectively forced internal gravity waves , 1989 .

[24]  Imad A. Hannoun,et al.  Turbulent mixing at a shear-free density interface , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  D. Carruthers,et al.  Velocity fluctuations near an interface between a turbulent region and a stably stratified layer , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  J. Deardorff,et al.  Further results from a laboratory model of the convective planetary boundary layer , 1985 .

[27]  L. Mahrt,et al.  Heat Transport in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. , 1984 .

[28]  J. Ferziger,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation. Guidelines for Its Application to Planetary Boundary Layer Research , 1984 .

[29]  C. Moeng A Large-Eddy-Simulation Model for the Study of Planetary Boundary-Layer Turbulence , 1984 .

[30]  D. Durran,et al.  An Upper Boundary Condition Permitting Internal Gravity Wave Radiation in Numerical Mesoscale Models , 1983 .

[31]  B. H. Stockton,et al.  Laboratory studies of the entrainment zone of a convectively mixed layer , 1980, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[32]  J. Deardorff Prediction of Convective Mixed-Layer Entrainment for Realistic Capping Inversion Structure , 1979 .

[33]  F. B. Smith,et al.  Thermodynamic Model for the Development of a Convectively Unstable Boundary Layer , 1975 .

[34]  Alan K. Betts,et al.  Reply to comment on the paper ‘Non‐precipitating cumulus convection and its parameterization’ , 1974 .

[35]  Donald H. Lenschow,et al.  Airplane Measurements of Planetary Boundary Layer Structure , 1970 .

[36]  D. Lilly Models of cloud-topped mixed layers under a strong inversion , 1968 .