A comparison of letter and digit processing in letter-by-letter reading

The extent to which letter-by-letter reading results from a specific orthographic deficit, as compared with a nonspecific disturbance in basic visuoperceptual mechanisms, is unclear. The current study directly compared processing of letters and digits in a letter-by-letter reader, G.M., using a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task and a speeded matching task. Comparisons were made to a group of six brain-damaged individuals without reading deficits. In the RSVP task, G.M. had increased difficulty reporting the target identities when they were letters, as compared with digits. Although this general pattern was also evident in the control group, the magnitude of the letter–digit accuracy difference was greater in G.M. Similarly, in the matching task, G.M. was slower to match letters than digits, relative to the control group, although his response times to both item types were increased. These data suggest that letter-by-letter reading, at least in this case, results from a visuoperceptual encoding deficit that particularly affects letters, but also extends to processing of digits to a lesser extent. Results are consistent with the notion that a left occipitotemporal area is specialized for letter processing with greater bilaterality in the visual processing of digits. (JINS, 2008, 14, 164–173.)

[1]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words , 1992, Cognition.

[2]  L. Cohen Number processing in pure alexia: The effect of hemispheric asymmetries and task demands , 1995 .

[3]  Timothy A. Salthouse,et al.  Interpreting Reaction Time Measures in Between-Group Comparisons , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[4]  Spelling dyslexia: a deficit of the visual word-form. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  J. Dejerine,et al.  Contribution a l'etude anatomo-pathologique et clinique des differentes varietes de cecite verbale , 2000 .

[6]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area , 2004, NeuroImage.

[7]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  William S Maki,et al.  Sources of interference in the attentional blink: Target-distractor similarity revisited , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  S E Shaywitz,et al.  Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.

[10]  E. Warrington,et al.  A disorder of simultaneous form perception. , 1962, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[12]  K Patterson,et al.  Letter-by-letter reading: psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  Jeffrey A. Hadley,et al.  Letter-by-letter surface alexia , 1992 .

[14]  J. Richard Hanley,et al.  Reading speed in pure alexia , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Functional mechanisms in pure alexia: Evidence from letter processing , 1994 .

[17]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  Fast and Specific Access to Orthographic Knowledge in a Case of Letter-by-letter Surface Alexia , 1996 .

[18]  J. Duncan,et al.  Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: Pure alexia is not pure , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Daniel Holender,et al.  Differential Processing of Phonographic and Logographic Single-Digit Numbers by the Two Hemispheres , 2018, Mathematical Disabilities.

[21]  D. Bub,et al.  Single-character processing in a case of pure alexia , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  Letter-by-letter Reading: Psychological Descriptions of a Neurologial Syndrome , 1982 .

[23]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  A prelexical basis for letter-by-letter reading: A case study , 1990 .

[25]  R. Conrad,et al.  Letter Structure of the English Language , 1960, Nature.

[26]  R. Friedman,et al.  Pictures, images, and pure alexia: A case study , 1984 .

[27]  R. Klein,et al.  The Attentional Blink is Immune to Masking-Induced Data Limits , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  D N Levine,et al.  A study of the visual defect in verbal alexia-simultanagnosia. , 1978, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  T A Polk,et al.  Brain localization for arbitrary stimulus categories: a simple account based on Hebbian learning. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  M. Farah,et al.  Neural Specialization for Letter Recognition , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  X. Seron Number and language processing , 2001 .

[32]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  G. Denes,et al.  Task-Specificity and Similarities in Processing Numbers and Words: Available Data and Future Directions , 2000, Brain and Language.

[34]  R. Sperry,et al.  Interhemispheric interaction during simultaneous bilateral presentation of letters or digits in commissurotomized patients. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[36]  J. Kay Simultaneous form perception and serial letter recognition in a case of letter-by letter reading , 2000 .

[37]  Janice Kay,et al.  An evaluation of statistical procedures for comparing an individual's performance with that of a group of controls , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[38]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Perceptual Cues in Pure Alexia , 1996 .

[39]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[40]  T Shallice,et al.  Word-form dyslexia. , 1980, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  VARIETIES OF PURE ALEXIA: THE CASE OF FAILURE TO ACCESS GRAPHEMIC REPRESENTATIONS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[42]  G. Eskes,et al.  Temporal processing deficits in letter-by-letter reading , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[43]  T. L. Taylor,et al.  Category effects in temporal visual search , 1997 .

[44]  L. J. Chapman,et al.  Do Children and the Elderly Show Heightened Semantic Priming? How to Answer the Question. , 1994 .

[45]  Elizabeth K. Warrington,et al.  A dissociation between addition and subtraction with written calculation , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  T A Polk,et al.  The neural development and organization of letter recognition: evidence from functional neuroimaging, computational modeling, and behavioral studies. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Martin Arguin,et al.  Sequential and parallel letter processing in letter-by-letter dyslexia , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[49]  T. Shallice,et al.  Pure Alexia: A Nonspatial Visual Disorder Affecting Letter Activation , 1995 .

[50]  Martha J. Farah Pure alexia as a visual impairment: A reconsideration , 1995 .

[51]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Attentional blink , 2009, Scholarpedia.