Experimental study and discrete element method simulation of Geldart Group A particles in a small-scale fluidized bed

Abstract Geldart Group A particles are of great importance in various chemical processes because of advantages such as ease of fluidization, large surface area, and many other unique properties. It is very challenging to model the fluidization behavior of such particles as widely reported in the literature. In this study, a pseudo-2D experimental column with a width of 5 cm, a height of 45 cm, and a depth of 0.32 cm was developed for detailed measurements of fluidized bed hydrodynamics of fine particles to facilitate the validation of computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modeling. The hydrodynamics of sieved FCC particles (Sauter mean diameter of 148 µm and density of 1300 kg/m 3 ) and NETL-32D sorbents (Sauter mean diameter of 100 µm and density of 480 kg/m 3 ) were investigated mainly through the visualization by a high-speed camera. Numerical simulations were then conducted by using NETL’s open source code MFIX-DEM. Both qualitative and quantitative information including bed expansion, bubble characteristics, and solid movement were compared between the numerical simulations and the experimental measurement. The cohesive van der Waals force was incorporated in the MFIX-DEM simulations and its influences on the flow hydrodynamics were studied.

[1]  Mojtaba Ghadiri,et al.  Computer simulation of the effect of contact stiffness and adhesion on the fluidization behaviour of powders , 2007 .

[2]  Todd Pugsley,et al.  Simulation of Cold Flow FCC Stripper Hydrodynamics at Small Scale Using Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2003 .

[3]  S. Sjostrom,et al.  Investigation of Porous Silica Supported Mixed-Amine Sorbents for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture , 2012 .

[4]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Micromechanical modeling and analysis of different flow regimes in gas fluidization , 2012 .

[5]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Development and validation of a novel digital image analysis method for fluidized bed particle image velocimetry , 2012 .

[6]  Wei Wang,et al.  Simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow by a multi-scale CFD approach - Extension of the EMMS model to the sub-grid level , 2007 .

[7]  Y. Tsuji,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed , 1993 .

[8]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Particle-scale modelling of gas-solid flow in fluidisation † , 2003 .

[9]  Rahul Garg,et al.  Documentation of open-source MFIX–DEM software for gas-solids flows , 2010 .

[10]  John R. Grace,et al.  Complementarity of CFD, Experimentation and reactor models for solving challenging fluidization problems , 2010 .

[11]  D. Gidaspow.  Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions , 1994 .

[12]  Guangwen Xu,et al.  Two-fluid modeling of Geldart A particles in gas-solid micro-fluidized beds , 2015 .

[13]  William A. Rogers,et al.  Investigation of CO 2 capture using solid sorbents in a fluidized bed reactor: Cold flow hydrodynamics , 2016 .

[14]  Peiyuan Liu,et al.  Fine-particle defluidization: Interaction between cohesion, Young׳s modulus and static bed height , 2016 .

[15]  D. Geldart.  Types of gas fluidization , 1973 .

[16]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Why the two-fluid model fails to predict the bed expansion characteristics of Geldart A particles in gas-fluidized beds: A tentative answer , 2009 .

[17]  J. Israelachvili.  Intermolecular and surface forces , 1985 .

[18]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[19]  S. Sundaresan,et al.  Rheology of cohesive granular materials across multiple dense-flow regimes. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  O. Molerus,et al.  Interpretation of Geldart's type A, B, C and D powders by taking into account interparticle cohesion forces , 1982 .

[21]  Naoki Shimada,et al.  DEM–CFD analysis of fluidization behavior of Geldart Group A particles using a dynamic adhesion force model , 2013 .

[22]  J.A.M. Kuipers,et al.  The effects of particle and gas properties on the fluidization of Geldart A particles , 2005 .

[23]  Dimitri Gidaspow,et al.  Equation of state and radial distribution functions of FCC particles in a CFB , 1998 .

[24]  Jai Kant Pandit,et al.  On Geldart Group A behaviour in fluidized beds with and without cohesive interparticle forces: A DEM study , 2006 .

[25]  S. Sundaresan,et al.  A modified cohesion model for CFD–DEM simulations of fluidization , 2016 .

[26]  D. Snider.  An incompressible three-dimensional multiphase particle-in-cell model for dense particle flows , 2001 .

[27]  Y. Tsuji,et al.  DEM Analysis on Flow Patterns of Geldart's Group A Particles in Fluidized Bed , 2006 .

[28]  Tingwen Li,et al.  Numerical simulation of horizontal jet penetration in a three-dimensional fluidized bed , 2008 .

[29]  Jai Kant Pandit,et al.  Study of Geldart's Group A behaviour using the discrete element method simulation , 2005 .

[30]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Review of discrete particle modeling of fluidized beds , 2007 .

[31]  Berend van Wachem,et al.  Derivation, simulation and validation of a cohesive particle flow CFD model , 2008 .

[32]  Olivier Simonin,et al.  A functional subgrid drift velocity model for filtered drag prediction in dense fluidized bed , 2012 .

[33]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  A numerical study of fluidization behavior of Geldart A particles using a discrete particle model , 2004 .

[34]  Fariborz Taghipour,et al.  CFD Modeling of the Hydrodynamics and Reaction Kinetics of FCC Fluidized-Bed Reactors , 2005 .

[35]  Sofiane Benyahia,et al.  The effect of cohesive forces on the fluidization of aeratable powders , 2014 .

[36]  John R. Grace,et al.  New structure-based model for Eulerian simulation of hydrodynamics in gas–solid fluidized beds of Geldart group “A” particles , 2014 .

[37]  Jonathan Seville,et al.  Interparticle forces in fluidisation: a review , 2000 .

[38]  Danesh K. Tafti,et al.  Hybrid parallelism in MFIX CFD-DEM using OpenMP , 2014 .

[39]  Todd Pugsley,et al.  Simulation and experimental validation of a freely bubbling bed of FCC catalyst , 2003 .

[40]  Chris Guenther,et al.  Improvement in Precision, Accuracy, and Efficiency in Standardizing the Characterization of Granular Materials , 2013 .

[41]  Tingwen Li,et al.  CFD-DEM study of effect of bed thickness for bubbling fluidized beds , 2012 .

[42]  S. Pannala,et al.  Open-source MFIX-DEM software for gas-solids flows: Part I – verification studies , 2012 .

[43]  John R. Grace,et al.  Study of wall boundary condition in numerical simulations of bubbling fluidized beds , 2010 .

[44]  T. Pugsley,et al.  Study of gas streaming in a deep fluidized bed containing Geldart's Group A particles , 2010 .

[45]  Arthur T. Andrews,et al.  Filtered two‐fluid models for fluidized gas‐particle suspensions , 2008 .

[46]  Christopher W. Jones,et al.  Amine-tethered solid adsorbents coupling high adsorption capacity and regenerability for CO2 capture from ambient air. , 2011, ChemSusChem.

[47]  Jamal Chaouki,et al.  Effects of temperature on local two-phase flow structure in bubbling and turbulent fluidized beds of FCC particles , 2004 .

[48]  Danesh K. Tafti,et al.  Development of parallel DEM for the open source code MFIX , 2013 .

[49]  Ronald W. Breault,et al.  High speed imaging of particle flow fields in CFB risers , 2013 .