Modelling the size-dependent collection efficiency of hedgerows for ambient aerosols

A model for estimating the size-segregated particle collection efficiencies of three hedgerow species of different aerodynamic porosities has been developed and tested in the particle size range 0.5–View the MathML source. Collection efficiency (CE) has been described in terms of the coupled effects of the deviation of the approach flow (CEflow) and the filtration through the foliage elements (CEfiltration). Variations in barrier porosities with wind speed, which govern both the flow and the particle collection mechanism, have been modelled using an empirical parameter called the “rigidity factor” (r) for representative leaf-sizes of the three hedge types. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) allows simulation of velocity fields and turbulence around the barriers, leading to identification of prominent flow separation zones in the wake of denser hedges. Application of different turbulence closure schemes in the CFD model influences the predicted CE only for particles above View the MathML source. Field validations obtained for a porous (hawthorn) and a denser (yew) hedge indicate that CEfiltration ranges between 10 and 35% for “coarse” particles (10–View the MathML source) and 1–5% for “fine” particles (0.5–View the MathML source), the porous hedge showing higher values in the former case and vice versa in the latter. Model predictions of CE over the particle size range studied for the porous hedge lie within 1–30% and for the denser hedge within 0.4–3%.

[1]  J. Monteith,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[2]  Kaijie Fang,et al.  Effects of Inhaled Ambient Particulate Matter on Pulmonary Antimicrobial Immune Defense , 2003, Inhalation toxicology.

[3]  F. Menter.  Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[4]  Ana Elena Scarabino,et al.  Canopy flow and aspects of the response of plants protected by herbaceous shelterbelts and wood fences , 2002 .

[5]  A. G. Lane,et al.  The effect of plant structure on the drift of pesticides at field boundaries. , 2000 .

[6]  Joel Schwartz,et al.  REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF HEALTH EFFECTS OF PARTICULATE AIR POLLUTION , 1995 .

[7]  John D. Wilson,et al.  Numerical studies of flow through a windbreak , 1985 .

[8]  F. Tampieri,et al.  The removal of particulate matter from the atmosphere: the physical mechanisms , 1982 .

[9]  S. P. S. Arya,et al.  Windbreak effectiveness for storage pile fugitive dust control: a wind tunnel study , 1988 .

[10]  M. Brauer,et al.  Air Pollution and Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators , 2004, Inhalation toxicology.

[11]  A. S. Thom,et al.  Momentum, mass and heat exchange of vegetation , 1972 .

[12]  P. Freer-Smith,et al.  The uptake of particulates by an urban woodland: site description and particulate composition. , 1997, Environmental pollution.

[13]  T. Gatski,et al.  Modelling the pressure–strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[15]  W. Slinn,et al.  Predictions for particle deposition to vegetative canopies , 1982 .

[16]  E. Takle,et al.  A numerical simulation of boundary-layer flows near shelterbelts , 1995 .

[17]  N. Woods,et al.  The entrapment of particles by windbreaks , 2001 .

[18]  Hidenori Takahashi,et al.  A first-order closure model for the wind flow within and above vegetation canopies , 2000 .

[19]  On the critical stokes' number for particle transport in potential and viscous flows near bluff bodies , 1990 .

[20]  Smith Wh.  Removal of atmospheric particulates by urban vegetation: implications for human and vegetative health. , 1977 .

[21]  J. Chung,et al.  Particle dynamics in a gas-particle flow over normal and inclined plates , 1988 .

[22]  A. Thom,et al.  Turbulence in and above Plant Canopies , 1981 .

[23]  E. Takle,et al.  On three-dimensionality of shelterbelt structure and its influences on shelter effects , 1996 .

[24]  A. R Packwood,et al.  Flow through porous fences in thick boundary layers: comparisons between laboratory and numerical experiments , 2000 .

[25]  Friedrich Löffler,et al.  Realistic modelling of the behaviour of fibrous filters through consideration of filter structure , 1994 .

[26]  K. Peters,et al.  Modelling the dry deposition velocity of aerosol particles to a spruce forest , 1992 .

[27]  Weeratunge Malalasekera,et al.  An introduction to computational fluid dynamics - the finite volume method , 2007 .

[28]  A. J. Frost,et al.  The effects of hedges on spray deposition and on the biological impact of pesticide spray drift. , 1994, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[29]  T. Uçar,et al.  Wind tunnel studies on spray deposition on leaves of tree species used for windbreaks and exposure of honey bees. , 2003, Pest management science.

[30]  L. Schwark,et al.  Biomonitoring of air quality in the Cologne conurbation using pine needles as a passive sampler—Part I: magnetic properties , 2004 .