Cosmic shear requirements on the wavelength dependence of telescope point spread functions

Cosmic shear requires high precision measurement of galaxy shapes in the presence of the observational point spread function (PSF) that smears out the image. The PSF must therefore be known for each galaxy to a high accuracy. However, for several reasons, the PSF is usually wavelength dependent; therefore, the differences between the spectral energy distribution of the observed objects introduce further complexity. In this paper, we investigate the effect of the wavelength dependence of the PSF, focusing on instruments in which the PSF size is dominated by the diffraction limit of the telescope and which use broad-band filters for shape measurement. We first calculate biases on cosmological parameter estimation from cosmic shear when the stellar PSF is used uncorrected. Using realistic galaxy and star spectral energy distributions and populations and a simple three-component circular PSF, we find that the colour dependence must be taken into account for the next generation of telescopes.We then consider two different methods for removing the effect: (i) the use of stars of the same colour as the galaxies and (ii) estimation of the galaxy spectral energy distribution using multiple colours and using a telescope model for the PSF. We find that both of these methods correct the effect to levels below the tolerances required for per cent level measurements of dark energy parameters. Comparison of the two methods favours the template-fitting method because its efficiency is less dependent on galaxy redshift than the broad-band colour method and takes full advantage of deeper photometry.

[1]  T. Broadhurst,et al.  A Method for Weak Lensing Observations , 1994, astro-ph/9411005.

[2]  Ofer Lahav,et al.  ANNz: Estimating Photometric Redshifts Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2004 .

[3]  Adam Amara,et al.  Optimal Surveys for Weak Lensing Tomography , 2006, astro-ph/0610127.

[4]  Dipak Munshi,et al.  Cosmology with weak lensing surveys. , 2005, Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences.

[5]  Masahiro Takada,et al.  Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration , 2006 .

[6]  A. Amara,et al.  Point spread function calibration requirements for dark energy from cosmic shear , 2007, 0711.4886.

[7]  A. Amara,et al.  Photometric redshifts for weak lensing tomography from space: the role of optical and near infrared photometry , 2007, 0705.1437.

[8]  D. Weedman,et al.  Colors and magnitudes predicted for high redshift galaxies , 1980 .

[9]  Cea,et al.  Weak Gravitational Lensing with COSMOS: Galaxy Selection and Shape Measurements , 2007, astro-ph/0702359.

[10]  P. Capak,et al.  A Large Sample of Spectroscopic Redshifts in the ACS-GOODS Region of the Hubble Deep Field North , 2004, astro-ph/0401354.

[11]  G. Bernstein,et al.  Inhomogeneous systematic signals in cosmic shear observations , 2005, astro-ph/0507546.

[12]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  Weak Gravitational Lensing and Its Cosmological Applications , 2008, 0805.0139.

[13]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations , 2005, astro-ph/0506112.

[14]  A. Lewis Galaxy shear estimation from stacked images , 2009, 0901.0649.

[15]  R. Ellis,et al.  The Shear TEsting Programme 2: Factors affecting high precision weak lensing analyses , 2006, astro-ph/0608643.

[16]  A. Amara,et al.  Euclid Imaging Consortium Science Book , 2010 .

[17]  A. Kinney,et al.  Template ultraviolet to near-infrared spectra of star-forming galaxies and their application to K-corrections , 1996 .

[18]  J. Newman,et al.  The Team Keck Treasury Redshift Survey of the GOODS-North Field , 2004, astro-ph/0401353.

[19]  A. Réfrégier Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure , 2003, astro-ph/0307212.

[20]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  HANDBOOK FOR THE GREAT08 CHALLENGE: AN IMAGE ANALYSIS COMPETITION FOR COSMOLOGICAL LENSING , 2008, 0802.1214.