Exploring renewable energy pricing with analytic network process — Comparing a developed and a developing economy

Increasing use of renewable sources has a vital importance in mitigating increasing energy demand and global warming. The limited reserves and negative environmental impacts associated with fossil fuel consumption make the renewable energy sources considerable alternatives in case environmental externalities are taken into consideration. Pricing models for renewable energy alternatives are commonly based on the same fundamentals as the fossil fuels, but this approach neglects some of the characteristics that are unique to renewable energy alternatives. In order to develop more accurate pricing models these unique variables which are mostly considered as market externalities need to be integrated in the current forms of pricing models. The originality of this work is its ability to combine social, technical, environmental and economic aspects using analytic network process in order to provide a more holistic point of view on factors impacting renewable energy pricing through a comparison of two case studies. United States (U.S.) and Turkey are the two cases analyzed in this paper. U.S. represents a developed economy whereas Turkey represents a developing economy. It is expected that the results of this work would be helpful for further research in understanding the dynamics behind pricing mechanism of the renewable sources in different environments. For instance, fundamental differences in relative importance of pricing factors between two case countries have been identified as different levels of enforcement through laws and regulations, impact of geographic characteristics on site selection and job opportunities created through new investments.

[1]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  A framework for technology assessment: Case of a Thai building material manufacturer , 2009 .

[2]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Technology forecasting for residential energy management devices , 2011 .

[3]  A. Bassi,et al.  Informing the US Energy Policy Debate with Threshold 21 , 2010 .

[4]  Pablo Aragonés-Beltrán,et al.  An Analytic Network Process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain). , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[6]  Elena Comino,et al.  Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Analytic Network Process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  C. Robert Kenley,et al.  Job creation due to nuclear power resurgence in the United States , 2009 .

[8]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of natural gas resources , 2007 .

[9]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach , 2007 .

[10]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Fuel cell system economics: comparing the costs of generating power with stationary and motor vehicle PEM fuel cell systems , 2004 .

[11]  Christoph Weber,et al.  Distribution of costs induced by the integration of RES-E power , 2008 .

[12]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Assessing Renewable Energy Portfolio Futures with Multiple Perspectives: The Case of the Northwest US , 2010 .

[13]  O. A. Jaramillo,et al.  Using hydropower to complement wind energy: a hybrid system to provide firm power , 2004 .

[14]  S. Tafreshi,et al.  Modeling and Forecasting of Energy Prices using Non-stationary Markov Models versus Stationary Hybrid Models including a Survey of all Methods , 2007, 2007 IEEE Canada Electrical Power Conference.

[15]  Şenol Erdoğmuş,et al.  Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors , 2005 .

[16]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Developing Oregon's renewable energy portfolio using fuzzy goal programming model , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[17]  János M. Beér,et al.  High efficiency electric power generation: The environmental role , 2007 .

[18]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  Slow technologies and government intervention: Energy efficiency in industrial process technologies , 2006 .

[19]  Ali Keyhani,et al.  Stochastic price modeling of electricity in deregulated energy markets , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  M. Malliaris,et al.  Forecasting energy product prices , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005..

[21]  Alison J. Gilbert,et al.  Indicators of Sustainable Development , 1999 .

[22]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Forecasting energy storage technologies , 2009 .

[23]  Sevin Sozer,et al.  Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach , 2003 .

[24]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[25]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback , 2001 .

[26]  Svetlana Batrakova,et al.  Stimulating energy-efficient innovations in the Dutch building sector: Empirical evidence from patent counts and policy lessons , 2010 .

[27]  Zehra Kamisli Ozturk,et al.  Exam scheduling: Mathematical modeling and parameter estimation with the Analytic Network Process approach , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[28]  A. Stirling On the economics and analysis of diversity , 1998 .

[29]  G.J. Anders,et al.  Energy price forecasting and bidding strategy in the Ontario power system market , 2005, 2005 IEEE Russia Power Tech.

[30]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Computable general equilibrium models for sustainability impact assessment: Status quo and prospects , 2006 .

[31]  I J Smeenk,et al.  Drinking water contaminants. , 1983, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  T. Daim,et al.  Selection of Renewable Energy Technologies for a Developing County: A Case of Pakistan , 2011 .

[33]  Gülfem Tuzkaya,et al.  An analytic network process approach for locating undesirable facilities: an example from Istanbul, Turkey. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[34]  G. Sheblé,et al.  Applying Spot Rate Forecast Technique in Estimating Energy Price Uncertainties , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.

[35]  Mónica García-Melón,et al.  A Project Strategic Index proposal for portfolio selection in electrical company based on the Analytic Network Process , 2010 .

[36]  Daniel Pope,et al.  Nuclear Implosions: The Rise and Fall of the Washington Public Power Supply System , 2008 .

[37]  A. Markandya,et al.  Energy security, energy modelling and uncertainty , 2010 .

[38]  J. A. Carta,et al.  Technical-economic analysis of wind-powered pumped hydrostorage systems. Part II: Model application to the island of El Hierro , 2005 .

[39]  Ben M. Enis,et al.  Operation of Hybrid Wind-Turbine Compressed-Air System for Connection to Electric Grid Networks and Cogeneration , 2003 .

[40]  Petros A. Pilavachi,et al.  Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2009 .

[41]  J. Contreras,et al.  Short-term demand and energy price forecasting , 2006, MELECON 2006 - 2006 IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference.

[42]  J. S. Glower,et al.  Pricing the variance of wind energy , 1996, Proceedings of the 39th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[43]  Kelly R. Cowan,et al.  Comparative technological road-mapping for renewable energy , 2009 .

[44]  D. Kirk-Davidoff,et al.  Weather response to management of a large wind turbine array , 2009 .

[45]  S. Awerbuch Portfolio-Based Electricity Generation Planning: Policy Implications For Renewables And Energy Security , 2006 .

[46]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand: Environmental and cost performance , 2008 .

[47]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks , 2005 .

[48]  T. Daim,et al.  Exploring the adoption of alternative energy technologies: a literature review , 2013 .

[49]  Muhammad Amer,et al.  Technology Roadmapping for wind energy: case of the Pacific Northwest , 2012 .

[50]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Smart thermostats: are we ready? , 2010 .

[51]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Offshore wind power policy and planning in Sweden , 2011 .

[52]  Theocharis Tsoutsos,et al.  The sustainable diffusion of renewable energy technologies as an example of an innovation-focused policy , 2005 .

[53]  C. M. Affonso,et al.  Pricing analysis in the Brazilian energy market: A decision tree approach , 2009, 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech.

[54]  J. Kaldellis,et al.  Techno-economic evaluation of small hydro power plants in Greece: a complete sensitivity analysis , 2005 .

[55]  David Toke,et al.  The UK offshore wind power programme: A sea-change in UK energy policy? , 2011 .

[56]  M. Moner-Girona A new tailored scheme for the support of renewable energies in developing countries , 2009 .

[57]  Umut Asan,et al.  Identifying strategic management concepts: An analytic network process approach , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[58]  S. Mirasgedis,et al.  Economic Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Abatement Measures in the Greek Energy Sector , 2002 .

[59]  Valeria Costantini,et al.  Security of Energy Supply: Comparing Scenarios from a European Perspective , 2005 .

[60]  Timothy R. Anderson,et al.  Exploring the impact of technology development and adoption for sustainable hydroelectric power and , 2010 .

[61]  Stephen Ogaji,et al.  Novel approach for improving power-plant availability using advanced engine diagnostics , 2002 .

[62]  Türkay Dereli,et al.  Patent analysis of wind energy technology using the patent alert system , 2012 .

[63]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Application of technology roadmaps for renewable energy sector , 2010 .

[64]  Mónica García-Melón,et al.  An environmental pressure index proposal for urban development planning based on the analytic network process , 2009 .

[65]  S. Persaud,et al.  Potential for wind generation on the Guyana coastlands , 1999 .

[66]  Sora Lee,et al.  Selection of technology acquisition mode using the analytic network process , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[67]  Patrick E. Meyer,et al.  Modeling technology diffusion of complementary goods: The case of hydrogen vehicles and refueling infrastructure , 2009, Technovation.

[68]  Paul Ekins,et al.  Step changes for decarbonising the energy system: research needs for renewables, energy efficiency and nuclear power , 2004 .

[69]  H. Vacik,et al.  Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management , 2005 .

[70]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Technology assessment for clean energy technologies: The case of the Pacific Northwest , 2009 .

[71]  Muhammad Amer,et al.  Development of fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) based scenarios , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of PICMET '11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET).

[72]  Dundar F. Kocaoglu,et al.  A decision model for energy resource selection in China , 2009, PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[73]  J. C. Jansen,et al.  Long-term energy services security: What is it and how can it be measured and valued? , 2010 .

[74]  K. Tsuji,et al.  Analysis on the energy pricing and its reduction effect on environmental impact in urban area including DHC , 2000, 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37077).

[75]  Didem Cinar,et al.  Development of future energy scenarios with intelligent algorithms: Case of hydro in Turkey , 2010 .

[76]  Hamed Rafiei,et al.  Designing a decision support system to evaluate and select suppliers using fuzzy analytic network process , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..