Improved nitrogen removal in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors by incorporation of Anammox bacteria into the granular sludge.

Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors may offer a number of advantages over conventional mixed-tank, SBR, and biofilm reactors, including high space-loading, low footprint, and resistance to shocks and toxins. In this study, we assessed the use of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor technology as applied to anaerobic ammonia removal, or Anammox. Four 200 ml UASB reactors were inoculated with 50% (by volume) anaerobic granular sludge and 50% flocular sludge from different sources (all with the potential for containing Anammox organisms). Tools used to assess the reactors included basic analyses, fluorescent in-situ hybridisation, and mathematical modelling, with statistical non-linear parameter estimation. Two of the reactors showed statistically identical Anammox activity (i.e., identical kinetic parameters), with good ammonia and nitrite removal (0.14 kgNHx m(-3) reactor day(-1), with 99% ammonia removal). The third reactor also demonstrated significant Anammox activity, but with poor identifiability of parameters. The fourth reactor had no statistical Anammox activity. Modelling indicated that poor identifiability and performance in the third and fourth reactors were related to an excess of reduced carbon, probably originating in the inoculum. Accumulation of Anammox organisms was confirmed both by a volume loading much lower than the growth rate, and response to a probe specific for organisms previously reported to mediate Anammox processes. Overall, the UASB reactors were effective as Anammox systems, and identifiability of the systems was good, and repeatable (even compared to a previous study in a rotating biological contactor). This indicates that operation, design, and analysis of Anammox UASB reactors specifically, and Anammox systems in general, are reliable and portable, and that UASB systems are an appropriate technology for this process.

[1]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1) , 2002 .

[2]  M. Wagner,et al.  The anammox case – A new experimental manifesto for microbiological eco-physiology , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[3]  P. Alvarez,et al.  Enrichment and characterization of an anammox bacterium from a rotating biological contactor treating ammonium-rich leachate , 2001, Archives of Microbiology.

[4]  Hansruedi Siegrist,et al.  Mathematical modeling of autotrophic denitrification in a nitrifying biofilm of a rotating biological contactor , 2000 .

[5]  Marc Strous,et al.  Ammonium removal from concentrated waste streams with the anaerobic ammonium oxidation (Anammox) process in different reactor configurations , 1997 .

[6]  Hansruedi Siegrist,et al.  Nitrogen loss in a nitrifying rotating contactor treating ammonium-rich wastewater without organic carbon , 1998 .

[7]  D J Batstone,et al.  Kinetics of thermophilic, anaerobic oxidation of straight and branched chain butyrate and valerate , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  Gatze Lettinga,et al.  UASB Process design for various types of wastewaters. , 1991 .

[9]  K. Schleifer,et al.  The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set. , 1999, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[10]  P. Hugenholtz,et al.  Design and evaluation of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 2002, Methods in molecular biology.

[11]  J. G. Kuenen,et al.  The anaerobic oxidation of ammonium. , 1998, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[12]  P. Reichert AQUASIM-a tool for simulation and data analysis of aquatic systems , 1994 .