Comparison of Doppler derived haemodynamic variables and simultaneous high fidelity pressure measurements in severe pulmonary hypertension.

OBJECTIVE--To assess relations between right ventricular pressure measured with a high fidelity transducer tipped catheter and the characteristics of tricuspid regurgitation recorded with Doppler echocardiography. DESIGN--A prospective non-randomised study of patients with severe pulmonary hypertension referred for consideration of lung transplantation. SETTING--A tertiary referral centre for cardiac and pulmonary disease, with facilities for invasive and non-invasive investigation, and assessment for heart and heart-lung transplantation. PATIENTS--10 patients with severe pulmonary hypertension being considered for lung transplantation. ENDPOINTS--Peak right ventricular, pulmonary artery, and right atrial pressures; peak positive and negative right ventricular dP/dt; peak Doppler right ventricular-right atrial pressure drop; Doppler derived peak positive and negative right ventricular dP/dt; and time intervals of Q to peak right ventricular pressure and to peak positive and negative right ventricular dP/dt. RESULTS--The mean (SD) pulmonary artery systolic pressure was 109 (29) mm Hg. The peak Doppler right ventricular-right atrial pressure drop underestimated peak right ventricular pressure by 38 (21) mm Hg, and by 21 (18) mm Hg when the Doppler value was added to the measured right atrial pressure (P values < 0.05). This discrepancy was greater for higher pulmonary artery pressures. The timing of peak right ventricular pressure differed, with the Doppler value consistently shorter (mean difference 16 ms, P < 0.05). Values of peak positive and negative right ventricular dP/dt and the time intervals Q-peak positive right ventricular dP/dt and pulmonary closure to the end of the pressure pulse differed between the two techniques in individual patients, but not in a consistent or predictable way. CONCLUSIONS--Doppler echocardiography significantly underestimates the peak right ventricular pressure and the time interval to peak right ventricular pressure in pulmonary hypertension, particularly when severe. These differences may be related to orifice geometry. Digitisation of Doppler records of tricuspid regurgitation provides useful semiquantitative estimates of absolute values and timing of peak positive and negative right ventricular dP/dt. Clinically significant differences may exist, however, and must be considered in individual patients.

[1]  D G Gibson,et al.  Effects of abnormal activation on the time course of the left ventricular pressure pulse in dilated cardiomyopathy , 1992, British heart journal.

[2]  A. Weyman,et al.  Noninvasive Measurement of the Time Constant of Left Ventricular Relaxation Using the Continuous‐Wave Doppler Velocit Profile of Mitral Regurgitation , 1992, Circulation.

[3]  D. Gibson,et al.  Left ventricular filling characteristics in pulmonary hypertension: a new mode of ventricular interaction , 1992, British heart journal.

[4]  D. Gibson,et al.  Assessment of the peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity from the dynamics of retrograde flow. , 1992, International journal of cardiology.

[5]  T L Talbot,et al.  Errors in pressure gradient measurement by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound: type, size and age effects in bioprosthetic aortic valves. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  R A Levine,et al.  Noninvasive Estimation of the Instantaneous First Derivative of Left Ventricular Pressure Using Continuous‐Wave Doppler Echocardiography , 1991, Circulation.

[7]  G Maurer,et al.  Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. , 1990, Circulation.

[8]  N. Dean,et al.  Noninvasive Evaluation of Pulmonary Artery Pressure During Exercise by Saline-Enhanced Doppler Echocardiography in Chronic Pulmonary Disease , 1989, Circulation.

[9]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  Unpredictable zero drift in intravascular micromanometer tipped catheters during long term pulmonary artery pressure recording: implications for catheter design. , 1989, Cardiovascular research.

[10]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: applications to the study of blood flow and jets by imaging techniques. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  R. S. Mitchell,et al.  When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula?: Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  M. Sutton,et al.  The effect of chronic pulmonary hypertension on left ventricular size, function, and interventricular septal motion. , 1987, American heart journal.

[13]  B. Brundage,et al.  Doppler echocardiography assessment of impaired left ventricular filling in patients with right ventricular pressure overload due to primary pulmonary hypertension , 1986 .

[14]  L. Hatle,et al.  Noninvasive estimation of systolic pressure in the right ventricle in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. , 1986, European heart journal.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[16]  B. Brundage,et al.  Doppler echocardiographic assessment of impaired left ventricular filling in patients with right ventricular pressure overload due to primary pulmonary hypertension. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Seward,et al.  Continuous wave Doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: a simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patients. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  P. Yock,et al.  Noninvasive estimation of right ventricular systolic pressure by Doppler ultrasound in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. , 1984, Circulation.

[19]  C. T. Cox,et al.  Elementary fluid mechanics , 1954 .