Macroscopic handling and reporting of breast cancer specimens pre‐ and post‐neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment: review of pathological issues and suggested approaches
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Pinder | E. Rakha | J. Bartlett | A. Thompson | C. Purdie | A. Shaaban | A. Francis | R. Stein
[1] Gideon Blumenthal,et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.
[2] John M S Bartlett,et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[3] M. Dieci,et al. Loss of HER2 positivity and prognosis after neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[4] Yan-Fang Xie,et al. Changes in ER, PR and HER2 receptors status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2013, Pathology, research and practice.
[5] Carsten Denkert,et al. Response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[6] S. Pinder,et al. HER2 testing for breast carcinoma: recommendations for rapid diagnostic pathways in clinical practice , 2013, Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[7] W. Woodward,et al. Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab predicts for improved survival in women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[8] S. Rodenhuis,et al. Breast cancer subtyping by immunohistochemistry and histological grade outperforms breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[9] S. Ogawa,et al. Alterations of the genes involved in the PI3K and estrogen-receptor pathways influence outcome in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2013, BMC Cancer.
[10] R. Sen,et al. Histopathologic changes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. , 2013, Indian journal of cancer.
[11] Petra Macaskill,et al. Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2012, European journal of cancer.
[12] J. Ibarra. The Value of Combined Large Format Histopathology Technique to Assess the Surgically Removed Breast Tissue following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single Institution Study of 40 Cases , 2012, International journal of breast cancer.
[13] A M Thompson,et al. Neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[14] Xu Zhang,et al. Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Breast Predicts Axillary Nodal Status , 2012, The American surgeon.
[15] P. Fasching,et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[16] Keda Yu,et al. A prognostic model to predict outcome of patients failing to achieve pathological complete response after anthracycline‐containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer , 2012, Journal of surgical oncology.
[17] M. Rezai,et al. Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.
[18] E. Rutgers,et al. Surgical complications of skin sparing mastectomy and immediate prosthetic reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer. , 2012, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[19] A. Nassar,et al. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression pre- and post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast carcinoma: a single institutional experience. , 2012, International journal of clinical and experimental pathology.
[20] A. Tutt,et al. Recommendations from an International Consensus Conference on the Current Status and Future of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Primary Breast Cancer , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[21] C. Perou,et al. TP53 genomics predict higher clinical and pathologic tumor response in operable early-stage breast cancer treated with docetaxel-capecitabine ± trastuzumab , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[22] P. Fasching,et al. Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab predicts favorable survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: results from the TECHNO trial of the AGO and GBG study groups. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[23] Qifeng Yang,et al. Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients. , 2011, European journal of cancer.
[24] S. Lipsitz,et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast reconstruction , 2011, Cancer.
[25] J. Bonneterre,et al. Is there a Reliable Method to Assess the Complete Pathologic Response on the Tumor after Neo‐adjuvant Chemotherapy in Inflammatory Breast Cancer toward Recommendations for the Pathologic Process? Experience in 56 Patients Treated in a Single Institution , 2010, The breast journal.
[26] A. González-Angulo,et al. Breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and residual disease , 2010, Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico.
[27] K. Yonemori,et al. Predictors of recurrence in breast cancer patients with a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.
[28] Jiong Wu,et al. Molecular subtype can predict the response and outcome of Chinese locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with preoperative therapy. , 2010, Oncology reports.
[29] M. J. van de Vijver,et al. A simple system for grading the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[30] G. Hortobagyi,et al. Loss of HER2 Amplification Following Trastuzumab-Based Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy and Survival Outcomes , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.
[31] W. Weichert,et al. Identification of biology-based breast cancer types with distinct predictive and prognostic features: role of steroid hormone and HER2 receptor expression in patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.
[32] M. Miyazaki,et al. Clinical Significance of Axillary Microresiduals After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Cytologically Proven Metastases , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[33] P. Conte,et al. A prognostic model based on nodal status and Ki-67 predicts the risk of recurrence and death in breast cancer patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[34] I. Alvarado-Cabrero,et al. Incidence of pathologic complete response in women treated with preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: correlation of histology, hormone receptor status, Her2/Neu, and gross pathologic findings. , 2009, Annals of diagnostic pathology.
[35] R. Carlos,et al. Breast cancer sentinel node identification and classification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy-systematic review and meta analysis. , 2009, Academic radiology.
[36] Yunni-Yi Chen,et al. Pure and Predominantly Pure Intralymphatic Breast Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Unusual and Adverse Pattern of Residual Disease , 2009, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[37] G. Hortobagyi,et al. Hormone receptor status and pathologic response of HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[38] Z. Nahleh,et al. Residual cancer burden in locally advanced breast cancer: a superior tool , 2008, Current oncology.
[39] T. Uematsu,et al. Comparison of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her-2 status in breast cancer pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2008, Breast.
[40] F. Penault-Llorca,et al. Comparison of the prognostic significance of Chevallier and Sataloff's pathologic classifications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of operable breast cancer. , 2008, Human pathology.
[41] L. Sidéris,et al. Surgical margins in breast-conservation operations for invasive carcinoma: does neoadjuvant chemotherapy have an impact? , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
[42] L. Sidéris,et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer results in a lower axillary lymph node count. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
[43] I. Ellis,et al. HER2 testing in the UK: further update to recommendations , 2008, Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[44] K. Hess,et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[45] I. Eltoum,et al. The Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Histologic Grade, Hormone Receptor Status, and Her2/neu Status in Breast Carcinoma , 2008, The breast journal.
[46] S. Paik,et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[47] H. Tsuda,et al. Histopathological criteria for assessment of therapeutic response in breast cancer (2007 version) , 2008, Breast cancer.
[48] T. Shien,et al. Comparison among different classification systems regarding the pathological response of preoperative chemotherapy in relation to the long-term outcome , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[49] J. Maublant,et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Is Accurate in Breast Cancer Patients with a Clinically Negative Axillary Nodal Status at Presentation , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[50] G. Mills,et al. A functional genetic approach identifies the PI3K pathway as a major determinant of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. , 2007, Cancer cell.
[51] Christos Hatzis,et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[52] M. Dixon,et al. Histopathology of breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a common association between letrozole therapy and central scarring , 2007, Histopathology.
[53] G. Hortobagyi,et al. Residual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcome. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[54] J. A. van der Hage,et al. Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[55] W. Han,et al. Prognostic significance of bcl-2 expression in stage III breast cancer patients who had received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy , 2007, BMC cancer.
[56] E Provenzano,et al. Laboratory handling and histology reporting of breast specimens from patients who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2007, Histopathology.
[57] E. Winer,et al. Predictors of Resistance to Preoperative Trastuzumab and Vinorelbine for HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.
[58] Mitch Dowsett,et al. Prognostic value of Ki67 expression after short-term presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[59] Andreas Makris,et al. Evaluation of Ki-67 proliferation and apoptotic index before, during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.
[60] D. Slamon,et al. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive locally advanced breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[61] G. Hortobagyi,et al. Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[62] E. Rutgers,et al. Sentinel Node Biopsy Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Spares Breast Cancer Patients Axillary Lymph Node Dissection , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[63] I. Smith,et al. Pathological complete response and residual DCIS following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.
[64] Charles E. Cox,et al. Sentinel Node Biopsy Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Determining Axillary Status and Treatment Prognosis in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer , 2004, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[65] G. Hortobagyi,et al. Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[66] L. Carey,et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer outcome. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[67] S. Humphreys,et al. Radiopaque coil insertion into breast cancers prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2005, Breast.
[68] G. Hortobagyi,et al. Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2005, Cancer.
[69] Z. Varga,et al. Stability of the HER2 gene after primary chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer , 2005, Virchows Archiv.
[70] M. Gnant,et al. Influence of Neoadjuvant Therapy with Epirubicin and Docetaxel on the Expression of HER2/neu in Patients with Breast Cancer , 2003, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[71] D. Kadambari,et al. Complete axillary conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a step towards conserving axilla? , 2004, Indian journal of cancer.
[72] T. Powles,et al. Quantitative changes in cytological molecular markers during primary medical treatment of breast cancer: A pilot study , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[73] D. Wickerham,et al. The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[74] A. Hutcheon,et al. A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. , 2003, Breast.
[75] F. Penault-Llorca,et al. Is Nottingham prognostic index useful after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer? , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.
[76] I. Ellis,et al. Correlation of Histologic Prognostic Factors in Core Biopsies and Therapeutic Excisions of Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[77] L. Newman,et al. Histopathologic Evidence of Tumor Regression in the Axillary Lymph Nodes of Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemotherapy Correlates With Breast Cancer Outcome , 2003, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[78] J. Bryant,et al. Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy , 2002 .
[79] Henry M Kuerer,et al. Assessment of histologic features and expression of biomarkers in predicting pathologic response to anthracycline‐based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast carcinoma , 2002, Cancer.
[80] Fiona J Gilbert,et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[81] J. Bryant,et al. Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18. , 2002, Cancer.
[82] H. Tsuda,et al. Concordance in pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy between invasive and noninvasive components of primary breast carcinomas , 2002, Breast cancer.
[83] H. Tsuda,et al. Histopathological criteria for assessment of therapeutic response in breast cancer , 2001, Breast cancer.
[84] X. Xu,et al. Undesirable cytokeratin immunoreactivity of native nonepithelial cells in sentinel lymph nodes from patients with breast carcinoma. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[85] A. Vincent-Salomon,et al. Prognostic value of persistent node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.
[86] Carder. Typing breast cancer following primary chemotherapy , 1999, Histopathology.
[87] N. Dash,et al. Usefulness of tissue marker clips in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[88] S. Pinder,et al. The importance of the histologic grade of invasive breast carcinoma and response to chemotherapy , 1998, Cancer.
[89] D. Wickerham,et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[90] U. Moll,et al. Morphologic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. , 1997, Pathology, research and practice.
[91] M. Brizzi,et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on Ki67 labelling index, c-erbB-2 expression and steroid hormone receptor status in human breast tumours. , 1996, Anticancer research.
[92] Z. Baloch,et al. Pathologic response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a determinant of outcome. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
[93] M. Kaufmann,et al. Histologische Regression des Mammakarzinoms nach primärer (neoadjuvanter) Chemotherapie , 1994 .
[94] H. Junkermann,et al. [Histologic regression of breast cancer after primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy]. , 1994, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.
[95] P. Hurteloup,et al. Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Pilot Study of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (FEC‐HD) Results in a High Histologic Response Rate , 1993 .
[96] S. Steinberg,et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the combined modality approach of locally advanced nonmetastatic breast cancer. , 1987, Cancer research.