Macroscopic handling and reporting of breast cancer specimens pre‐ and post‐neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment: review of pathological issues and suggested approaches

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is used increasingly in the treatment of invasive breast cancer and presents challenges for the pathologist in the handling and interpretation of tissues. Potential issues include pathological identification and localization of the residual tumour site; how best to assess pathological response (given the diversity of scoring systems described); the timing and assessment of axillary node biopsy; and the value of retesting any residual tumour for dissonance between core biopsy and post‐treatment residual cancer cells for biomarker expression such as oestrogen and progesterone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The role of the pathologist is critical in modern NACT approaches to breast cancer and is likely to remain challenging as novel agents and newer biomarkers become available. In this manuscript we review these issues and describe some practical approaches to handling and reporting these samples in the routine histopathology laboratory.

[1]  Gideon Blumenthal,et al.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[2]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[3]  M. Dieci,et al.  Loss of HER2 positivity and prognosis after neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  Yan-Fang Xie,et al.  Changes in ER, PR and HER2 receptors status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2013, Pathology, research and practice.

[5]  Carsten Denkert,et al.  Response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  S. Pinder,et al.  HER2 testing for breast carcinoma: recommendations for rapid diagnostic pathways in clinical practice , 2013, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[7]  W. Woodward,et al.  Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab predicts for improved survival in women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  S. Rodenhuis,et al.  Breast cancer subtyping by immunohistochemistry and histological grade outperforms breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[9]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Alterations of the genes involved in the PI3K and estrogen-receptor pathways influence outcome in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2013, BMC Cancer.

[10]  R. Sen,et al.  Histopathologic changes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. , 2013, Indian journal of cancer.

[11]  Petra Macaskill,et al.  Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[12]  J. Ibarra The Value of Combined Large Format Histopathology Technique to Assess the Surgically Removed Breast Tissue following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single Institution Study of 40 Cases , 2012, International journal of breast cancer.

[13]  A M Thompson,et al.  Neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  Xu Zhang,et al.  Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Breast Predicts Axillary Nodal Status , 2012, The American surgeon.

[15]  P. Fasching,et al.  Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Keda Yu,et al.  A prognostic model to predict outcome of patients failing to achieve pathological complete response after anthracycline‐containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer , 2012, Journal of surgical oncology.

[17]  M. Rezai,et al.  Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  E. Rutgers,et al.  Surgical complications of skin sparing mastectomy and immediate prosthetic reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer. , 2012, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[19]  A. Nassar,et al.  Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression pre- and post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast carcinoma: a single institutional experience. , 2012, International journal of clinical and experimental pathology.

[20]  A. Tutt,et al.  Recommendations from an International Consensus Conference on the Current Status and Future of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Primary Breast Cancer , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  C. Perou,et al.  TP53 genomics predict higher clinical and pathologic tumor response in operable early-stage breast cancer treated with docetaxel-capecitabine ± trastuzumab , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[22]  P. Fasching,et al.  Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab predicts favorable survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: results from the TECHNO trial of the AGO and GBG study groups. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Qifeng Yang,et al.  Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[24]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast reconstruction , 2011, Cancer.

[25]  J. Bonneterre,et al.  Is there a Reliable Method to Assess the Complete Pathologic Response on the Tumor after Neo‐adjuvant Chemotherapy in Inflammatory Breast Cancer toward Recommendations for the Pathologic Process? Experience in 56 Patients Treated in a Single Institution , 2010, The breast journal.

[26]  A. González-Angulo,et al.  Breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and residual disease , 2010, Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico.

[27]  K. Yonemori,et al.  Predictors of recurrence in breast cancer patients with a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[28]  Jiong Wu,et al.  Molecular subtype can predict the response and outcome of Chinese locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with preoperative therapy. , 2010, Oncology reports.

[29]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  A simple system for grading the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[30]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Loss of HER2 Amplification Following Trastuzumab-Based Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy and Survival Outcomes , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[31]  W. Weichert,et al.  Identification of biology-based breast cancer types with distinct predictive and prognostic features: role of steroid hormone and HER2 receptor expression in patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.

[32]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Clinical Significance of Axillary Microresiduals After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Cytologically Proven Metastases , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[33]  P. Conte,et al.  A prognostic model based on nodal status and Ki-67 predicts the risk of recurrence and death in breast cancer patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[34]  I. Alvarado-Cabrero,et al.  Incidence of pathologic complete response in women treated with preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: correlation of histology, hormone receptor status, Her2/Neu, and gross pathologic findings. , 2009, Annals of diagnostic pathology.

[35]  R. Carlos,et al.  Breast cancer sentinel node identification and classification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy-systematic review and meta analysis. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[36]  Yunni-Yi Chen,et al.  Pure and Predominantly Pure Intralymphatic Breast Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Unusual and Adverse Pattern of Residual Disease , 2009, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[37]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Hormone receptor status and pathologic response of HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[38]  Z. Nahleh,et al.  Residual cancer burden in locally advanced breast cancer: a superior tool , 2008, Current oncology.

[39]  T. Uematsu,et al.  Comparison of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her-2 status in breast cancer pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2008, Breast.

[40]  F. Penault-Llorca,et al.  Comparison of the prognostic significance of Chevallier and Sataloff's pathologic classifications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of operable breast cancer. , 2008, Human pathology.

[41]  L. Sidéris,et al.  Surgical margins in breast-conservation operations for invasive carcinoma: does neoadjuvant chemotherapy have an impact? , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[42]  L. Sidéris,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer results in a lower axillary lymph node count. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[43]  I. Ellis,et al.  HER2 testing in the UK: further update to recommendations , 2008, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[44]  K. Hess,et al.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  I. Eltoum,et al.  The Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Histologic Grade, Hormone Receptor Status, and Her2/neu Status in Breast Carcinoma , 2008, The breast journal.

[46]  S. Paik,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  H. Tsuda,et al.  Histopathological criteria for assessment of therapeutic response in breast cancer (2007 version) , 2008, Breast cancer.

[48]  T. Shien,et al.  Comparison among different classification systems regarding the pathological response of preoperative chemotherapy in relation to the long-term outcome , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[49]  J. Maublant,et al.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Is Accurate in Breast Cancer Patients with a Clinically Negative Axillary Nodal Status at Presentation , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[50]  G. Mills,et al.  A functional genetic approach identifies the PI3K pathway as a major determinant of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. , 2007, Cancer cell.

[51]  Christos Hatzis,et al.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[52]  M. Dixon,et al.  Histopathology of breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a common association between letrozole therapy and central scarring , 2007, Histopathology.

[53]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Residual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcome. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  J. A. van der Hage,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[55]  W. Han,et al.  Prognostic significance of bcl-2 expression in stage III breast cancer patients who had received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy , 2007, BMC cancer.

[56]  E Provenzano,et al.  Laboratory handling and histology reporting of breast specimens from patients who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2007, Histopathology.

[57]  E. Winer,et al.  Predictors of Resistance to Preoperative Trastuzumab and Vinorelbine for HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[58]  Mitch Dowsett,et al.  Prognostic value of Ki67 expression after short-term presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[59]  Andreas Makris,et al.  Evaluation of Ki-67 proliferation and apoptotic index before, during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.

[60]  D. Slamon,et al.  Docetaxel, cisplatin, and trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive locally advanced breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[61]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[62]  E. Rutgers,et al.  Sentinel Node Biopsy Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Spares Breast Cancer Patients Axillary Lymph Node Dissection , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[63]  I. Smith,et al.  Pathological complete response and residual DCIS following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[64]  Charles E. Cox,et al.  Sentinel Node Biopsy Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Determining Axillary Status and Treatment Prognosis in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer , 2004, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[65]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[66]  L. Carey,et al.  American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer outcome. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[67]  S. Humphreys,et al.  Radiopaque coil insertion into breast cancers prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2005, Breast.

[68]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2005, Cancer.

[69]  Z. Varga,et al.  Stability of the HER2 gene after primary chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer , 2005, Virchows Archiv.

[70]  M. Gnant,et al.  Influence of Neoadjuvant Therapy with Epirubicin and Docetaxel on the Expression of HER2/neu in Patients with Breast Cancer , 2003, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[71]  D. Kadambari,et al.  Complete axillary conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a step towards conserving axilla? , 2004, Indian journal of cancer.

[72]  T. Powles,et al.  Quantitative changes in cytological molecular markers during primary medical treatment of breast cancer: A pilot study , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[73]  D. Wickerham,et al.  The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[74]  A. Hutcheon,et al.  A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. , 2003, Breast.

[75]  F. Penault-Llorca,et al.  Is Nottingham prognostic index useful after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer? , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[76]  I. Ellis,et al.  Correlation of Histologic Prognostic Factors in Core Biopsies and Therapeutic Excisions of Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[77]  L. Newman,et al.  Histopathologic Evidence of Tumor Regression in the Axillary Lymph Nodes of Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemotherapy Correlates With Breast Cancer Outcome , 2003, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[78]  J. Bryant,et al.  Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy , 2002 .

[79]  Henry M Kuerer,et al.  Assessment of histologic features and expression of biomarkers in predicting pathologic response to anthracycline‐based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast carcinoma , 2002, Cancer.

[80]  Fiona J Gilbert,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[81]  J. Bryant,et al.  Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18. , 2002, Cancer.

[82]  H. Tsuda,et al.  Concordance in pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy between invasive and noninvasive components of primary breast carcinomas , 2002, Breast cancer.

[83]  H. Tsuda,et al.  Histopathological criteria for assessment of therapeutic response in breast cancer , 2001, Breast cancer.

[84]  X. Xu,et al.  Undesirable cytokeratin immunoreactivity of native nonepithelial cells in sentinel lymph nodes from patients with breast carcinoma. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[85]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Prognostic value of persistent node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[86]  Carder Typing breast cancer following primary chemotherapy , 1999, Histopathology.

[87]  N. Dash,et al.  Usefulness of tissue marker clips in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[88]  S. Pinder,et al.  The importance of the histologic grade of invasive breast carcinoma and response to chemotherapy , 1998, Cancer.

[89]  D. Wickerham,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[90]  U. Moll,et al.  Morphologic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. , 1997, Pathology, research and practice.

[91]  M. Brizzi,et al.  Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on Ki67 labelling index, c-erbB-2 expression and steroid hormone receptor status in human breast tumours. , 1996, Anticancer research.

[92]  Z. Baloch,et al.  Pathologic response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a determinant of outcome. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[93]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Histologische Regression des Mammakarzinoms nach primärer (neoadjuvanter) Chemotherapie , 1994 .

[94]  H. Junkermann,et al.  [Histologic regression of breast cancer after primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy]. , 1994, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[95]  P. Hurteloup,et al.  Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Pilot Study of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (FEC‐HD) Results in a High Histologic Response Rate , 1993 .

[96]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the combined modality approach of locally advanced nonmetastatic breast cancer. , 1987, Cancer research.