Synthetic fracture network characterization with transdimensional inversion

Fracture network geometry is crucial for transport in hard rock aquifers, but it can only be approximated in models. While fracture orientation, spacing and intensity can be obtained from borehole logs, core images and outcrops, the characterization of in-situ fracture network geometry requires the interpretation of spatially distributed hydraulic and transport experiments. In this study we present a novel concept using a transdimensional inversion method (reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo, rjMCMC) to invert a two-dimensional cross-well discrete fracture network (DFN) geometry from tracer tomography experiments. The conservative tracer transport is modelled via a fast finite difference model neglecting matrix diffusion. The proposed DFN inversion method iteratively evolves DFN variants by geometry updates to fit the observed tomographic data evaluated by the Metropolis-Hastings-Green acceptance criteria. A main feature is the varying dimensions of the inverse problem, which allows for the calibration of fracture geometries and numbers. This delivers an ensemble of thousands of DFN realizations that can be utilized for probabilistic identification of fractures in the aquifer. In the presented hypothetical and outcrop-based case studies, cross-sections between boreholes are investigated. The procedure successfully identifies major transport pathways in the investigated domain and explores equally probable DFN realizations, which are analyzed in fracture probability maps and by multidimensional scaling.

[1]  Olivier Bour,et al.  Hydraulic properties of two‐dimensional random fracture networks following power law distributions of length and aperture , 2002 .

[2]  A. Bellin,et al.  Joint estimation of transmissivity and storativity in a bedrock fracture , 2011 .

[3]  Walter A Illman,et al.  Hydraulic Tomography Offers Improved Imaging of Heterogeneity in Fractured Rocks , 2013, Ground water.

[4]  Charles J. Geyer,et al.  Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2011 .

[5]  Jef Caers,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty of Complex Earth Systems in Metric Space , 2015 .

[6]  Zhenjie Li,et al.  An automated approach for conditioning discrete fracture network modelling to in situ measurements , 2014 .

[7]  Ivars Neretnieks,et al.  Diffusion in the rock matrix: An important factor in radionuclide retardation? , 1980 .

[8]  P. Bayer,et al.  Travel-time-based thermal tracer tomography , 2016 .

[9]  Yonghong Hao,et al.  Hydraulic Tomography for Detecting Fracture Zone Connectivity , 2008, Ground water.

[10]  T. Yeh,et al.  Stochastic inversion of pneumatic cross-hole tests and barometric pressure fluctuations in heterogeneous unsaturated formations , 2008 .

[11]  J. J. Gómez-Hernández,et al.  3D inverse modelling of groundwater flow at a fractured site using a stochastic continuum model with multiple statistical populations , 2002 .

[12]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Steady-state analysis of cross-hole pneumatic injection tests in unsaturated fractured tuff , 2003 .

[13]  Muhammad Sahimi,et al.  Flow and Transport in Porous Media and Fractured Rock: From Classical Methods to Modern Approaches , 1995 .

[14]  Jeffrey R. Moore,et al.  Distribution and inferred age of exfoliation joints in the Aar Granite of the central Swiss Alps and relationship to Quaternary landscape evolution , 2013 .

[15]  Olivier Bour,et al.  Passive temperature tomography experiments to characterize transmissivity and connectivity of preferential flow paths in fractured media , 2014 .

[16]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Parameter estimation and inverse problems , 2005 .

[17]  B. Berkowitz Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: A review , 2002 .

[18]  A. Jardani,et al.  Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm for the characterization of hydraulic conductivity from the heat tracing data , 2016 .

[19]  G. Böhm,et al.  A laboratory study of tracer tomography , 2013, Hydrogeology Journal.

[20]  Akhil Datta-Gupta,et al.  Asymptotic solutions for solute transport: A formalism for tracer tomography , 1999 .

[21]  P. Witherspoon,et al.  Porous media equivalents for networks of discontinuous fractures , 1982 .

[22]  Walter A. Illman,et al.  Three‐dimensional transient hydraulic tomography in a highly heterogeneous glaciofluvial aquifer‐aquitard system , 2011 .

[23]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[24]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Transdimensional inference in the geosciences , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy,et al.  Random Walk Methods for Modeling Hydrodynamic Transport in Porous and Fractured Media from Pore to Reservoir Scale , 2016, Transport in Porous Media.

[26]  W. Illman,et al.  Should hydraulic tomography data be interpreted using geostatistical inverse modeling? A laboratory sandbox investigation , 2015 .

[27]  Gregoire Mariethoz,et al.  Smart pilot points using reversible‐jump Markov‐chain Monte Carlo , 2016 .

[28]  Markov Chain Monte Carlo Implementation of Rock Fracture Modelling , 2007 .

[29]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Seismic tomography with the reversible jump algorithm , 2009 .

[30]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  Parameter Estimation by Ensemble Kalman Filters with Transformed Data , 2010 .

[31]  Junming Yang,et al.  Use of Conditional Simulation, Mechanical Theory, and Field Observations to Characterize the Structure of Faults and Fracture Networks , 2001 .

[32]  P. R. Lapointe,et al.  A method to characterize fracture density and connectivity through fractal geometry , 1988 .

[33]  Vladimir Cvetkovic,et al.  Inference of field‐scale fracture transmissivities in crystalline rock using flow log measurements , 2010 .

[34]  Walter A. Illman,et al.  Transient hydraulic tomography in a fractured dolostone: Laboratory rock block experiments , 2012 .

[35]  Philippe Davy,et al.  An inverse problem methodology to identify flow channels in fractured media using synthetic steady-state head and geometrical data , 2010 .

[36]  A. Torabi,et al.  Scaling of fault attributes: A review , 2011 .

[37]  Frederick D. Day-Lewis,et al.  Identifying fracture‐zone geometry using simulated annealing and hydraulic‐connection data , 2000 .

[38]  Velimir V. Vesselinov,et al.  Three‐dimensional numerical inversion of pneumatic cross‐hole tests in unsaturated fractured tuff: 1. Methodology and borehole effects , 2001 .

[39]  Olivier Bour,et al.  Connectivity properties of two‐dimensional fracture networks with stochastic fractal correlation , 2003 .

[40]  Alireza Baghbanan,et al.  Hydraulic properties of fractured rock masses with correlated fracture length and aperture , 2007 .

[41]  Daniel Paradis,et al.  Resolution analysis of tomographic slug test head data: Two‐dimensional radial case , 2015 .

[42]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  A methodology to interpret cross-hole tests in a granite block , 2006 .

[43]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  Geostatistical Inversion of Cross‐Hole Pumping Tests for Identifying Preferential Flow Channels Within a Shear Zone , 2001 .

[44]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Stochastic continuum representation of fractured rock permeability as an alternative to the REV and fracture network concepts , 1988 .

[45]  Hiromitsu Saegusa,et al.  Hydraulic tomography in fractured granite: Mizunami Underground Research site, Japan , 2009 .

[46]  Olivier Bour,et al.  Connectivity of random fault networks following a power law fault length distribution , 1997 .

[47]  M. Anderson,et al.  Darcy Velocity Is Not a Velocity , 2016, Ground water.

[48]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Three‐dimensional numerical inversion of pneumatic cross‐hole tests in unsaturated fractured tuff: 2. Equivalent parameters, high‐resolution stochastic imaging and scale effects , 2001 .

[49]  M. Ziegler,et al.  Growth of exfoliation joints and near-surface stress orientations inferred from fractographic markings observed in the upper Aar valley (Swiss Alps) , 2014 .

[50]  Yalchin Efendiev,et al.  Bayesian uncertainty quantification for flows in heterogeneous porous media using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo methods , 2010 .

[51]  J. M. Kang,et al.  Inverse Fracture Model Integrating Fracture Statistics and Well-testing Data , 2008 .

[52]  M. Jalali Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Behavior of Conductive Fractures using a Hybrid Finite Difference – Displacement Discontinuity Method , 2013 .

[53]  Olivier Bour,et al.  Comparison of alternative methodologies for identifying and characterizing preferential flow paths in heterogeneous aquifers , 2007 .

[54]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[55]  Antoine Mensch,et al.  An inverse technique for developing models for fluid flow in fracture systems using simulated annealing , 1993 .

[56]  M. Ziegler,et al.  Characterisation of Natural Fractures and Fracture Zones of the Basel EGS Reservoir Inferred from Geophysical Logging of the Basel-1 Well , 2015 .

[57]  Walter A Illman,et al.  Hydraulic/partitioning tracer tomography for DNAPL source zone characterization: small-scale sandbox experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[58]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  A travel time based hydraulic tomographic approach , 2003 .

[59]  T. Le Borgne,et al.  Conditioning of stochastic 3-D fracture networks to hydrological and geophysical data , 2013 .

[60]  M. Cardiff,et al.  Aquifer imaging with pressure waves—Evaluation of low‐impact characterization through sandbox experiments , 2016 .

[61]  Y. Zha,et al.  An Application of Hydraulic Tomography to a Large‐Scale Fractured Granite Site, Mizunami, Japan , 2016, Ground water.

[62]  P. Bayer,et al.  Time-lapse pressure tomography for characterizing CO2 plume evolution in a deep saline aquifer , 2015 .

[63]  B. Valley The relation between natural fracturing and stress heterogeneities in deep-seated crystalline rocks at Soultz-sous-Forêts (France) , 2007 .

[64]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport through fractured rocks , 2005 .

[65]  O. Cirpka,et al.  Tracer Tomography: Design Concepts and Field Experiments Using Heat as a Tracer , 2015, Ground water.

[66]  A. D. Gupta,et al.  Detailed Characterization of a Fractured Limestone Formation by Use of Stochastic Inverse Approaches , 1995 .

[67]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Non-random Discrete Fracture Network Modeling , 2012 .

[68]  Y. Zha,et al.  What does hydraulic tomography tell us about fractured geological media? A field study and synthetic experiments , 2015 .

[69]  S. Martel,et al.  Inverse hydrologic modeling using stochastic growth algorithms , 1998 .

[70]  Minghui Jin,et al.  AN ITERATIVE STOCHASTIC INVERSE METHOD: CONDITIONAL EFFECTIVE TRANSMISSIVITY AND HYDRAULIC HEAD FIELDS , 1995 .