The dilatant behaviour of sand–pile interface subjected to loading and stress relief

Property and behaviour of sand–pile interface are crucial to shaft resistance of piles. Dilation or contraction of the interface soil induces change in normal stress, which in turn influences the shear stress mobilised at the interface. Although previous studies have demonstrated this mechanism by laboratory tests and numerical simulations, the interface responses are not analysed systematically in terms of soil state (i.e. density and stress level). The objective of this study is to understand and quantify any increase in normal stress of different pile–soil interfaces when they are subjected to loading and stress relief. Distinct element modelling was carried out. Input parameters and modelling procedure were verified by experimental data from laboratory element tests. Parametric simulations of shearbox tests were conducted under the constant normal stiffness, constant normal load and constant volume boundary conditions. Key parameters including initial normal stress ($$ \sigma_{{{\text{n}}0}}^{\prime } $$), initial void ratio (e0), normal stiffness constraining the interface and loading–unloading stress history were investigated. It is shown that mobilised stress ratio ($$ \tau /\sigma_{\text{n}}^{\prime } $$) and normal stress increment ($$ \Updelta \sigma_{\text{n}}^{\prime } $$) on a given interface are governed by $$ \sigma_{{{\text{n}}0}}^{\prime } $$ and e0. An increase in $$ \sigma_{{{\text{n}}0}}^{\prime } $$ from 100 to 400 kPa leads to a 30 % reduction in $$ \Updelta \sigma_{\text{n}}^{\prime } $$. An increase in e0 from 0.18 to 0.30 reduces $$ \Updelta \sigma_{\text{n}}^{\prime } $$ by more than 90 %, and therefore, shaft resistance is much lower for piles in loose sands. A unique relationship between $$ \Updelta \sigma_{\text{n}}^{\prime } $$ and normal stiffness is established for different soil states. It can be applied to assess the shaft resistance of piles in soils with different densities and subjected to loading and stress relief. Fairly good agreement is obtained between the calculated shaft resistance based on the proposed relationship and the measured results in centrifuge model tests.

[1]  Vito Nicola Ghionna,et al.  INTERFACE BEHAVIOR OF SANDS FROM CONSTANT NORMAL STIFFNESS DIRECT SHEAR TESTS , 2003 .

[2]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Centrifuge and numerical modeling of axial load effects on piles in consolidating ground , 2009 .

[3]  V. Drnevich,et al.  SHEAR MODULUS AND DAMPING IN SOILS: DESIGN EQUATIONS AND CURVES , 1972 .

[4]  Rodrigo Salgado,et al.  Analysis of the shaft resistance of non-displacement piles in sand , 2008 .

[5]  C. Gaudin,et al.  Scale effects on tension capacity for rough piles buried in dense sand , 2005 .

[6]  Vito Nicola Ghionna,et al.  Shaft friction modelling of non-displacement piles in sand , 2002 .

[7]  K. Ishihara Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. , 1993 .

[8]  Paul W. Mayne,et al.  K o - OCR Relationships in Soil , 1982 .

[9]  Marte Gutierrez,et al.  Discrete element simulations of direct shear specimen scale effects , 2010 .

[10]  Kazem Fakharian,et al.  EFFECT OF STRESS PATHS ON THE BEHAVIOUR OF SAND-STEEL INTERFACES , 1996 .

[11]  David Airey,et al.  Pile Skin Friction in Sands from Constant Normal Stiffness Tests , 1995 .

[12]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Excavation effects on pile behaviour and capacity , 2012 .

[13]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Parametric analysis of the effects of stress relief on the performance and capacity of piles in nondilative soils , 2011 .

[14]  K. Soga,et al.  DEM analysis of soil fabric effects on behaviour of sand , 2010 .

[15]  Luis E. Vallejo,et al.  DEM analysis of crushing around driven piles in granular materials , 2005 .

[16]  M. Oda,et al.  Micro-Deformation Mechanism of Shear Banding Process Based on Modified Distinct Element Method , 1999 .

[17]  H. Kishida,et al.  Tests of the interface between sand and steel in the simple shear apparatus , 1987 .

[18]  F. Tatsuoka,et al.  MODELLING STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONS OF SAND , 1993 .

[19]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  How the dilatancy of soils affects their behaviour , 1991 .