Disabling occupational morbidity in the United States. An alternative way of seeing the Bureau of Labor Statistics' data.

The United States Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS) annual survey of occupational injuries and illnesses (ASOII) is one of the most frequently utilized sources of data on national occupational morbidity. In 1992 the BLS introduced a new and expanded survey method that collects more detailed data on cases with days-away-from-work (DAW). However, to date, the BLS has not released any official publication that contains a comprehensive set of crosstabulated part-of-body (BP) and nature-of-injury (NOI) data. To improve the understanding of national DAW case morbidity estimates, the study presented here utilized a special data-call and data-reduction strategy to identify the leading ASOII BP-NOI combinations for DAW cases by frequency, incidence rate, and severity (median DAW) for 1994. The results indicated the significance of disability associated with discrete trauma (ie, resulting from instantaneous or sudden events) in the US workplace. While morbidity associated with back pain clearly continued as the most frequent type of disabling case, fractures at critical anatomical sites (eg, pelvic region, leg, shoulder) were responsible for the most lengthy disability absences from work in 1994. In some instances these findings were contrary to conclusions typically inferred from BLS publications.

[1]  Michael Von Korff,et al.  An epidemiologic comparison of pain complaints , 1988, Pain.

[2]  M A Schork,et al.  Current methods of estimating severity for occupational injuries and illnesses: data from the 1986 Michigan Comprehensive Compensable Injury and Illness Database. , 1993, American journal of industrial medicine.

[3]  Bp. Klein Assessment of worker's compensation claims for back strain/sprains , 1984 .

[4]  C Wilkinson,et al.  Filtering effects in reporting work injuries. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  A Cheadle,et al.  Factors influencing the duration of work-related disability: a population-based study of Washington State workers' compensation. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[6]  W Halperin,et al.  Conceptual and definitional issues in occupational injury epidemiology. , 1997, American journal of industrial medicine.

[7]  S. Snook,et al.  The Cost of 1989 Workers' Compensation Low Back Pain Claims , 1994, Spine.

[8]  T K Courtney,et al.  Injury and illness in the American workplace: a comparison of data sources. , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[9]  R. Deyo,et al.  Physician Office Visits for Low Back Pain: Frequency, Clinical Evaluation, and Treatment Patterns From a U.S. National Survey , 1995, Spine.

[10]  E A Clancy,et al.  Length of disability and cost of workers' compensation low back pain claims. , 1997, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[11]  T K Courtney,et al.  Length of disability and cost of work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity. , 1998, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[12]  E. Volinn,et al.  Back Sprain in Industry: The Role of Socioeconomic Factors in Chronicity , 1991, Spine.

[13]  Establishing Guidelines for the Identification of Occupational Injuries: A Systematic Appraisal , 1995, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[14]  B. Cypress Characteristics of physician visits for back symptoms: a national perspective. , 1983, American journal of public health.