Structural response of cadaveric ribcages under a localized loading: stiffness and kinematic trends.

To improve understanding of structural coupling and deformation patterns throughout the loaded ribcage, the present study reports the force-displacement and kinematic responses under a highly-localized loading condition using three PMHS ribcages (ages 44, 61, and 63 years). The ribcages were quasi-statically loaded locally to a non-failure displacement (nominally 15% of the ribcage depth at the loaded rib level) at approximately 25 unilateral locations and 5-7 geometrically symmetric bilateral locations on the anterior surface of each ribcage, for a total of 94 tests. The translations of 56 points distributed around the anterior, lateral, and posterior portions of the superficial surface of the ribcage were measured while under loading. Each of the first through sixth rib levels was then separated from the remaining ribs, and this "rib ring" structure was individually loaded at the sternum in the anterior-posterior direction. The force when the ribcage was deflected to 8% of its initial depth was normalized to the force at the upper sternum (viz. 81.2±32.2 N). The normalized unilateral force at the costo-chondral junction was found to vary from 0.76±0.29 at rib 1 to 0.15±0.02 at rib 9, while bilateral forces (sum of left and right aspects) varied from 0.92 to 1.11. The rib rings were generally less stiff, ranging from 0.78±0.24 for rib 1 to 0.19±0.01 for rib 6. The deformation patterns under all loading conditions were quantified. In general, bilateral loading produced an approximately symmetric deformation pattern, while unilateral loading resulted in approximately twice as much resultant deformation on the ipsilateral side compared to the contralateral side.

[1]  John H Bolte,et al.  Oblique and lateral impact response of the PMHS thorax. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[2]  W. Hayes,et al.  Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. , 1976, Science.

[3]  R. Kent Frontal thoracic response to dynamic loading: the role of superficial tissues, viscera and the rib cage , 2008 .

[4]  L. Yamamoto,et al.  Thoracic trauma: the deadly dozen. , 2005, Critical care nursing quarterly.

[5]  Hyung Yun Choi,et al.  Human models for crash and impact simulation , 2004 .

[6]  Xiao-yang Li,et al.  Age and gender related changes in biomechanical properties of healthy human costal cartilage. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  David Lessley,et al.  Thoracic response to dynamic, non-impact loading from a hub, distributed belt, diagonal belt, and double diagonal belts. , 2004, Stapp car crash journal.

[8]  S. G. Moran,et al.  Occupant- and collision-related risk factors for blunt thoracic aorta injury. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  Dean C. Adams,et al.  Sequestering Size: The Role of Allometry and Gender in Digital Human Modeling , 2004 .

[10]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Human Response to and Injury from Lateral Impact , 1983 .

[11]  Alan M. Nahum,et al.  Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II , 1971 .

[12]  M. Cordeau,et al.  Thoracic dimensions at maximum lung inflation in normal subjects and in patients with obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. , 2001, Chest.

[13]  King H. Yang,et al.  Development of a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Chest Model for the 5(th) Percentile Female. , 2005, Stapp car crash journal.

[14]  John M. Cavanaugh,et al.  Injury and response of the thorax in side impact cadaveric tests , 1993 .

[15]  Masami Iwamoto,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE TOTAL HUMAN MODEL FOR SAFETY (THUMS) AND APPLICATION TO INJURY RECONSTRUCTION , 2002 .

[16]  James A. Newman,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THORACIC DEFLECTION RESPONSE TO BELT LOADING , 1982 .

[17]  C. Got,et al.  Modification of part 572 dummy for lateral impact according to biomechanical data , 1979 .

[18]  John M. Cavanaugh,et al.  Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma , 2002 .

[19]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Kinematics of the thorax under dynamic belt loading conditions , 2010 .

[20]  Yuichi Kitagawa,et al.  Muscle Tetanus and Loading Condition Effects on the Elastic and Viscous Characteristics of the Thorax , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[21]  Joel D Stitzel,et al.  Quantification of age-related shape change of the human rib cage through geometric morphometrics. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT responses in simulated far side impact. , 2007, Stapp car crash journal.

[23]  Fumio Matsuoka,et al.  On the fatal crash experience of older drivers. , 2005, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[24]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Dummy Torso Response to Anterior Quasi-Static Loading , 2005 .

[25]  Kurosh Darvish,et al.  Structural and material changes in the aging thorax and their role in crash protection for older occupants. , 2005, Stapp car crash journal.

[26]  Joel D. Stitzel,et al.  Non-Censored Rib Fracture Data from Dynamic Belt Loading Tests on the Human Cadaver Thorax , 2005 .

[27]  Joseph Shin,et al.  Quasi-static and dynamic thoracic loading tests: cadaveric torsos , 2007 .

[28]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Evaluation of thoracic deflection as an injury criterion for side impact using a finite elements thorax model. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.

[29]  Toshikazu Torigaki,et al.  Indentation stiffness of aging human costal cartilage. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[30]  Michael J. Salloum,et al.  DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADVANCED ATD THORAX SYSTEM FOR FRONTAL CRASH ENVIRONMENTS. FINAL REPORT. VOLUME 1. PRIMARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT. TRAUMA ASSESSMENT DEVICE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM , 1992 .

[31]  S. Robin,et al.  HUMOS: HUMAN MODEL FOR SAFETY - A JOINT EFFORT TOWARDS THE DEVELOPMENT OF REFINED HUMAN-LIKE CAR OCCUPANT MODELS , 2001 .

[32]  D C Viano,et al.  Biomechanics of the human chest, abdomen, and pelvis in lateral impact. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Herng-Ching Lin,et al.  Risk factors for 24-hour mortality after traumatic rib fractures owing to motor vehicle accidents: a nationwide population-based study. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[34]  Lawrence W. Schneider,et al.  DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADVANCED ATD THORAX SYSTEM FOR FRONTAL CRASH ENVIRONMENTS. FINAL REPORT. VOLUME 2. EXPLORATION OF ALTERNATIVE DESIGN APPROACHES. TRAUMA ASSESSMENT DEVICE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM , 1992 .

[35]  François Bellemare,et al.  Sex differences in thoracic dimensions and configuration. , 2003, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[37]  C. K. Kroell,et al.  The biomechanical basis for chest impact protection. I. Force-deflection characteristics of the thorax. , 1971, The Journal of trauma.