Improved Estimation of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy by Using the Ligand-Entropy and Mobility of Water Molecules

We previously developed the direct interaction approximation (DIA) method to estimate the protein-ligand binding free energy (ΔG). The DIA method estimates the ΔG value based on the direct van der Waals and electrostatic interaction energies between the protein and the ligand. In the current study, the effect of the entropy of the ligand was introduced with protein dynamic properties by molecular dynamics simulations, and the interaction between each residue of the protein and the ligand was also weighted considering the hydration of each residue. The molecular dynamics simulation of the apo target protein gave the hydration effect of each residue, under the assumption that the residues, which strongly bind the water molecules, are important in the protein-ligand binding. These two effects improved the reliability of the DIA method. In fact, the parameters used in the DIA became independent of the target protein. The averaged error of ΔG estimation was 1.3 kcal/mol and the correlation coefficient between the experimental ΔG value and the calculated ΔG value was 0.75.

[1]  Takeshi Kawabata,et al.  Build-Up Algorithm for Atomic Correspondence between Chemical Structures , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[2]  Ferran Sanz,et al.  3D-QSAR methods on the basis of ligand–receptor complexes. Application of COMBINE and GRID/GOLPE methodologies to a series of CYP1A2 ligands , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[3]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  H. R. Bairagya,et al.  Role of the conserved water molecules in the binding of inhibitor to IMPDH-II (human): A study on the water mimic inhibitor design , 2009 .

[5]  Eric T. Kim,et al.  How does a drug molecule find its target binding site? , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[7]  Leslie Greengard,et al.  A fast algorithm for particle simulations , 1987 .

[8]  Junmei Wang,et al.  How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  John B. O. Mitchell,et al.  A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking , 2010, Bioinform..

[10]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculation by the Smooth Reaction Path Generation (SRPG) Method , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  H. Fujitani,et al.  Massively parallel computation of absolute binding free energy with well-equilibrated states. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Johan Åqvist,et al.  Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[13]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  B. Berne,et al.  Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of factor Xa ligand binding. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  M Pastor,et al.  Comparative binding energy (COMBINE) analysis of human neutrophil elastase inhibition by pyridone-containing trifluoromethylketones. , 2001, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[16]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  A. Laio,et al.  Flexible docking in solution using metadynamics. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  R. Wade,et al.  Comparative binding energy (COMBINE) analysis of influenza neuraminidase-inhibitor complexes. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  Y. Fukunishi,et al.  Similarities among receptor pockets and among compounds: analysis and application to in silico ligand screening. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[20]  David L. Mobley,et al.  Let’s get honest about sampling , 2011, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[21]  Song Liu,et al.  A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[22]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[23]  Maria Kontoyianni,et al.  Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screening , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[24]  I. Tinoco,et al.  Equilibrium Information from Nonequilibrium Measurements in an Experimental Test of Jarzynski's Equality , 2002, Science.

[25]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Flexible docking of a ligand peptide to a receptor protein by multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation , 1997 .

[26]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Statistical Estimation of the Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Based On Direct Protein-Ligand Interaction Obtained by Molecular Dynamics Simulation , 2012, Pharmaceuticals.

[27]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[28]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  Docking performance of the glide program as evaluated on the Astex and DUD datasets: a complete set of glide SP results and selected results for a new scoring function integrating WaterMap and glide , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[30]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[31]  Y. Martin,et al.  A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[32]  M Pastor,et al.  Comparative binding energy analysis of HIV-1 protease inhibitors: incorporation of solvent effects and validation as a powerful tool in receptor-based drug design. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Pathway and mechanism of drug binding to G-protein-coupled receptors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  R. Wade,et al.  Prediction of drug binding affinities by comparative binding energy analysis. , 1997, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[35]  Y. Fukunishi,et al.  The Filling Potential Method: A Method for Estimating the Free Energy Surface for Protein−Ligand Docking , 2003 .

[36]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Multiple target screening method for robust and accurate in silico ligand screening. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[37]  Francesco Luigi Gervasio,et al.  From A to B in free energy space. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[38]  R C Wade,et al.  Nuclear receptor-DNA binding specificity: A COMBINE and Free-Wilson QSAR analysis. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[39]  R. Wade,et al.  Prediction of drug binding affinities by comparative binding energy analysis , 1995 .

[40]  Marta Murcia,et al.  Virtual screening with flexible docking and COMBINE-based models. Application to a series of factor Xa inhibitors. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  Alessandro Spina Pharmaceuticals , 2010, European Journal of Risk Regulation.

[42]  D. E. Clark,et al.  Flexible docking using tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity , 1998, Proteins.

[43]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Protein‐inhibitor flexible docking by a multicanonical sampling: Native complex structure with the lowest free energy and a free‐energy barrier distinguishing the native complex from the others , 2007, Proteins.