Detecting anomalies in longitudinal elevation of track geometry using train dynamic responses via a variational autoencoder

Track geometry is one of the most important health indices in the maintenance of rail tracks. Visual inspection and inspection using a track-geometry car are two common approaches to inspect track geometry. Presently, using accelerations from in-service trains has become a popular track inspection approach, because it is a low-cost way to monitor the rail tracks more frequently. However, due to the noise presented in the collected accelerations, detecting anomalies using manually designed features often results in many false alarms. In this paper, we propose a learning-based anomaly detection approach for monitoring the longitude elevation of track geometry from the dynamic response of an in-service train. We consider the track geometry with a sudden change as an anomaly, measured by the signal energy of slopes of the track geometry. The proposed approach uses a variational autoencoder (VAE) to detect the anomaly. The VAE takes accelerations as input and learns a mapping from the frequency-domain representation of acceleration signals to a low-dimensional latent space that represents the distribution of the observed data. The reconstruction probability, which measures the variability of the distribution of the input data, is used as an anomaly score for indicating how well the input follows the normal pattern. Compared to distance- and density-based anomaly detection methods, such as K-nearest neighbor and clustering, the VAE-based anomaly detection is robust to measurement noise and prevents overfitting because it captures the underlying distribution of the data in a low-dimensional space. Furthermore, the VAE-based method does not require model-specific thresholds for detecting anomalies because it uses a probabilistic measurement instead of reconstruction error as the anomaly score. We validate the proposed VAE-based approach on the vibration dataset from an in-service train. We show that this approach outperforms a baseline model (an autoencoder-based anomaly detection method) in terms of recall, precision, and F1-score. The proposed method also successfully addresses the overfitting problem presenting in recurrent neural network-based methods. The results make the proposed approach a strong candidate for low-cost and frequent track geometry inspection.

[1]  Laura Montalbán,et al.  Determination of Rail Vertical Profile through Inertial Methods , 2011 .

[2]  Justin Bayer,et al.  Variational Inference for On-line Anomaly Detection in High-Dimensional Time Series , 2016, ArXiv.

[3]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Long Short-Term Memory , 1997, Neural Computation.

[4]  James H. Garrett,et al.  A data fusion approach for track monitoring from multiple in-service trains , 2017 .

[5]  Zili Li,et al.  Axle box acceleration: Measurement and simulation for detection of short track defects , 2011 .

[6]  Shakir Mohamed,et al.  Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows , 2015, ICML.

[7]  Andrea Collina,et al.  A measurement system for quick rail inspection and effective track maintenance strategy , 2007 .

[8]  Sungzoon Cho,et al.  Variational Autoencoder based Anomaly Detection using Reconstruction Probability , 2015 .

[9]  Max Welling,et al.  Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes , 2013, ICLR.

[10]  Eugene J. O'Brien,et al.  Determination of Vertical Alignment of Track using Accelerometer Readings , 2015 .

[11]  James H. Garrett,et al.  Track-monitoring from the dynamic response of an operational train , 2017 .

[12]  Mario Bergés,et al.  Dynamic responses, GPS positions and environmental conditions of two light rail vehicles in Pittsburgh , 2019, Scientific Data.

[13]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Recognizing Surgical Activities with Recurrent Neural Networks , 2016, MICCAI.

[14]  Per Bergström,et al.  Robust registration of point sets using iteratively reweighted least squares , 2014, Computational Optimization and Applications.

[15]  Daniel Roggen,et al.  Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition , 2016, Sensors.

[16]  James H. Garrett,et al.  Track monitoring from the dynamic response of a passing train: A sparse approach , 2017 .

[17]  George Lederman Data-Driven Approaches for Track Monitoring Using In-Service Trains , 2016 .

[18]  Hedvig Kjellström,et al.  Advances in Variational Inference , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.