Do birds of different feather flock together? Analyzing the political use of social media through a language-based approach in a multilingual context

Author(s): Ahmed, S; Jaidka, K; Cho, J | Abstract: © 2018 Elsevier Ltd This study analyzes the political use of Twitter in the run-up to the 2013 Malaysian General Election. It follows a content and social network analysis approach to investigate the interplay of language and political partisanship in social media use, among Twitter users in Malaysia. In the period leading up to the 2013 elections, Twitter posts collected under the hashtag #GE13 reveal that communities that post in English versus the Malay language, differ in how they use Twitter and with whom they interact. As compared to English users, Malay users are more likely to seek political information and express their political opinion. In online discussions, we observe language-based homophily within the English and Malay language communities, but there are some cross-cutting interactions between opposing political communities. We discuss the implications of our findings for the political use of new communication technologies in multi-ethnic and multilingual societies.

[1]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Micro-blogging as online word of mouth branding , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  A. Bruns,et al.  POLITICAL NETWORKS ON TWITTER , 2013 .

[3]  Laramie D. Taylor,et al.  Understanding Fandom in the Multilingual Internet: A Study of “El Clásico” Fans’ Commenting Behavior on YouTube , 2017 .

[4]  N. Nie,et al.  Participation in America : Political Democracy and Social Equality , 1972 .

[5]  H. G. D. Zúñiga,et al.  Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships , 2014 .

[6]  J. Nagata.  what is a Malay? situational selection of ethnic identity in a plural society , 1974 .

[7]  Anne Bowser,et al.  PLAYING IN THE SAME TWITTER NETWORK , 2013 .

[8]  Joanne Rajadurai.  Crossing Borders: The Linguistic Practices of Aspiring Bilinguals in the Malay Community. , 2011 .

[9]  Maria de Fatima Oliveira,et al.  Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt , 2012 .

[10]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events , 2009 .

[11]  M. Broersma,et al.  SOCIAL MEDIA AS BEAT , 2012 .

[12]  June Ahn.  Digital Divides and Social Network Sites: Which Students Participate in Social Media? , 2011 .

[13]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[14]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[15]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[16]  Daniel A. McFarland,et al.  Bowling Young: How Youth Voluntary Associations Influence Adult Political Participation , 2006 .

[17]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Language Matters In Twitter: A Large Scale Study , 2011, ICWSM.

[18]  James Gomez.  Social Media Impact on Malaysia’s 13th General Election , 2014 .

[19]  Wong Fook Fei,et al.  The English Language And Its Impact On Identities Of Multilingual Malaysian Undergraduates , 2010 .

[20]  Dan Gillmor,et al.  We the media - grassroots journalism by the people, for the people , 2006 .

[21]  Masahiro Yamamoto,et al.  Social media and mobiles as political mobilization forces for young adults: Examining the moderating role of online political expression in political participation , 2015, New Media Soc..

[22]  Yonghwan Kim,et al.  The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: The relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Ties, Likes, and Tweets: Using Strong and Weak Ties to Explain Differences in Protest Participation Across Facebook and Twitter Use , 2018, Studying Politics Across Media.

[25]  U. Foehr,et al.  Trends in Media Use , 2008, The Future of children.

[26]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Revising the Communication Mediation Model for a New Political Communication Ecology , 2017 .

[27]  D. Boyd,et al.  The Arab Spring| The Revolutions Were Tweeted: Information Flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions , 2011 .

[28]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Social media and political communication: A survey of Twitter users during the 2013 Italian general election , 2013 .

[29]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  Understanding Generation Y and their use of social media: a review and research agenda , 2013 .

[30]  Leysia Palen,et al.  (How) will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising , 2012, CSCW.

[31]  Grant Blank.  The Digital Divide Among Twitter Users and Its Implications for Social Research , 2017 .

[32]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[33]  Yoojung Kim,et al.  Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  D. Stolle,et al.  Spill-Over Effects Between Facebook and On/Offline Political Participation? Evidence from a Two-Wave Panel Study , 2014 .

[35]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  MASS MEDIA FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH IN KNOWLEDGE , 1970 .

[36]  Monideepa Tarafdar,et al.  From "information" to "knowing": Exploring the role of social media in contemporary news consumption , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  A. Bruns,et al.  Structural layers of communication on Twitter , 2014 .

[38]  A. Hermida,et al.  SHARE, LIKE, RECOMMEND , 2012 .

[39]  Karen Moni,et al.  English in primary education in Malaysia: policies, outcomes and stakeholders’ lived experiences , 2011 .

[40]  Tamara A. Small.  WHAT THE HASHTAG? , 2011 .

[41]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage , 2009 .

[42]  Jennifer Gibbs,et al.  Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Kokil Jaidka,et al.  Protests against #delhigangrape on Twitter: Analyzing India's Arab Spring , 2013 .

[44]  Diana C. Mutz.  Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[45]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks , 2004 .

[46]  Jaeho Cho,et al.  Leveling or tilting the playing field: Social networking sites and offline political communication inequality , 2016 .

[47]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[48]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[49]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[50]  Y. Baek,et al.  Political homophily on social network sites and users' poll skepticism , 2015 .

[51]  A. Arvidsson,et al.  Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data , 2014 .

[52]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[53]  D. Boyd,et al.  Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization Over Time on Twitter , 2010 .

[54]  Chris J. Vargo,et al.  Socioeconomic Status, Social Capital, and Partisan Polarity as Predictors of Political Incivility on Twitter , 2017 .

[55]  Masahiro Yamamoto,et al.  Did Social Media Really Matter? College Students' Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election , 2010 .

[56]  D. Hindman,et al.  Does the Digital Divide Matter More? Comparing the Effects of New Media and Old Media Use on the Education-Based Knowledge Gap , 2011 .

[57]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[58]  Carol Soon,et al.  Engagement@web 2.0 between the government and citizens in Singapore: dialogic communication on Facebook? , 2014 .

[59]  A. Bruns,et al.  (NOT) THE TWITTER ELECTION , 2012 .

[60]  Clay Shirky.  The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change , 2011 .

[61]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[62]  Sun Hyoung Kim,et al.  Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[63]  A. Gruzd,et al.  Investigating Political Polarization on Twitter: A Canadian Perspective , 2014 .

[64]  A. Rahman,et al.  The Relationship Between Internet Usage, Socioeconomic Status, Subjective Health and Social Status , 2016 .

[65]  Phan Lê Hà,et al.  Nation Building, English as an International Language, Medium of Instruction, and Language Debate: Malaysia and Possible Ways Forward (doi: 10.14425/00.50.27) , 2013 .

[66]  D. Crystal,et al.  English as a Global Language , 1998 .

[67]  Kokil Jaidka,et al.  The 2014 Indian elections on Twitter: A comparison of campaign strategies of political parties , 2016, Telematics Informatics.