Synchronization likelihood with explicit time-frequency priors

Cognitive processing requires integration of information processed simultaneously in spatially distinct areas of the brain. The influence that two brain areas exert on each others activity is usually governed by an unknown function, which is likely to have nonlinear terms. If the functional relationship between activities in different areas is dominated by the nonlinear terms, linear measures of correlation may not detect the statistical interdependency satisfactorily. Therefore, algorithms for detecting nonlinear dependencies may prove invaluable for characterizing the functional coupling in certain neuronal systems, conditions or pathologies. Synchronization likelihood (SL) is a method based on the concept of generalized synchronization and detects nonlinear and linear dependencies between two signals (Stam, C.J., van Dijk, B.W., 2002. Synchronization likelihood: An unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets. Physica D, 163: 236-241.). SL relies on the detection of simultaneously occurring patterns, which can be complex and widely different in the two signals. Clinical studies applying SL to electro- or magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG) signals have shown promising results. In previous implementations of the algorithm, however, a number of parameters have lacked a rigorous definition with respect to the time-frequency characteristics of the underlying physiological processes. Here we introduce a rationale for choosing these parameters as a function of the time-frequency content of the patterns of interest. The number of parameters that can be arbitrarily chosen by the user of the SL algorithm is thereby decreased from six to two. Empirical evidence for the advantages of our proposal is given by an application to EEG data of an epileptic seizure and simulations of two unidirectionally coupled Hénon systems.

[1]  Theiler,et al.  Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[2]  C. Stam,et al.  Scale‐free dynamics of global functional connectivity in the human brain , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[3]  P. Grassberger,et al.  A robust method for detecting interdependences: application to intracranially recorded EEG , 1999, chao-dyn/9907013.

[4]  J. Palva,et al.  Phase Synchrony among Neuronal Oscillations in the Human Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Burke,et al.  Detecting dynamical interdependence and generalized synchrony through mutual prediction in a neural ensemble. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[6]  C. Stam,et al.  Nonlinear synchronization in EEG and whole‐head MEG recordings of healthy subjects , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Steven W. Smith,et al.  The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing , 1997 .

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model , 2004, NeuroImage.

[9]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Early Neural Correlates of Conscious Somatosensory Perception , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Mario Rosanova,et al.  Pattern-Specific Associative Long-Term Potentiation Induced by a Sleep Spindle-Related Spike Train , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  H. Petsche,et al.  Synchronization between prefrontal and posterior association cortex during human working memory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Disturbed fluctuations of resting state EEG synchronization in Alzheimer's disease , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  R Quian Quiroga,et al.  Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[15]  Karl J. Friston The labile brain. I. Neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[18]  John M. Beggs,et al.  Neuronal Avalanches Are Diverse and Precise Activity Patterns That Are Stable for Many Hours in Cortical Slice Cultures , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  P. Fries A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[21]  Ernesto Pereda,et al.  Assessment of changing interdependencies between human electroencephalograms using nonlinear methods , 2001 .

[22]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes , 2003, Nature.

[23]  Theiler,et al.  Generating surrogate data for time series with several simultaneously measured variables. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[24]  Rodrigo Quian Quiroga,et al.  Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals , 2005, Progress in Neurobiology.

[25]  Yuji Ikegaya,et al.  Synfire Chains and Cortical Songs: Temporal Modules of Cortical Activity , 2004, Science.

[26]  Remigiusz Tarnecki,et al.  Recurrence plots of neuronal spike trains , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  C. Stam,et al.  Synchronization likelihood: an unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets , 2002 .

[28]  M. Dumont,et al.  Interdependency between heart rate variability and sleep EEG: linear/non-linear? , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  H. Abarbanel,et al.  Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[30]  L. Tsimring,et al.  Generalized synchronization of chaos in directionally coupled chaotic systems. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[31]  A. von Stein,et al.  Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: from local gamma to long range alpha/theta synchronization. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[32]  C. Stam,et al.  Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: Review of an emerging field , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  C. Stam,et al.  Genetic components of functional connectivity in the brain: The heritability of synchronization likelihood , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[34]  E. Ott Chaos in Dynamical Systems: Contents , 1993 .

[35]  Andrea Mechelli,et al.  A report of the functional connectivity workshop, Dusseldorf 2002 , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Replay and Time Compression of Recurring Spike Sequences in the Hippocampus , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.