Noise, Amplification, and Compression: Considerations of Three Main Issues in Hearing Aid Design
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Characteristics and Distribution of Impaired Hearing in the Population of the United States , 1940 .
[2] Hallowell Davis,et al. Book Reviews: Hearing Aids: An Experimental Study of Design Objectives , 1948 .
[3] F. Miskolczy-Fodor,et al. Relation between Loudness and Duration of Tonal Pulses. III. Response in Cases of Abnormal Loudness Function , 1960 .
[4] Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al. Loudness Function of a 1000‐cps Tone in the Presence of a Masking Noise , 1964 .
[5] R. Carhart,et al. Influence of compressor action on speech intelligibility. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] E Villchur,et al. Simulation of the effect of recruitment on loudness relationships in speech. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] R Plomp,et al. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[9] R Plomp,et al. Room acoustics for the aged. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] B Hagerman,et al. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.
[11] D D Dirks,et al. Some effects of spectral shaping on recognition of speech by hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] B C Moore,et al. A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. , 1983, British journal of audiology.
[13] M W Skinner,et al. Amplification bandwidth and intelligibility of speech in quiet and noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1983, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[14] K Mizoi,et al. Clinical results of hearing aid with noise-level-controlled selective amplification. , 1983, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[15] R Plomp,et al. The effect of a hearing aid on the speech-reception threshold of hearing-impaired listeners in quiet and in noise. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] K Welzl-Müller,et al. Signal-to-noise threshold with and without hearing aid. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.
[17] W A Dreschler,et al. The use of single-channel compression for the improvement of speech intelligibility. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.
[18] L K Stein,et al. Listener‐Assessed Intelligibility of a Hearing Aid Self‐Adaptive Noise Filter , 1984, Ear and hearing.
[19] B C Moore,et al. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids. , 1985, British journal of audiology.
[20] D Byrne. Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and perceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] C V Pavlovic,et al. An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] R. Plomp. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[23] Jae S. Lim,et al. Speech enhancement , 1986, ICASSP '86. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[24] P M Zurek,et al. Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] R Plomp,et al. The effect of varying the slope of the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] Patrick M. Peterson. Using linearly-constrained adaptive beamforming to reduce interference in hearing aids from competing talkers in reverberant rooms , 1987, ICASSP '87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[27] D A Fabry,et al. Effects of an adaptive filter hearing aid on speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired subjects. , 1988, Ear and hearing.
[28] L E Humes,et al. Modeling sensorineural hearing loss. I. Model and retrospective evaluation. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] H Levitt,et al. An experimental comparison of four hearing aid prescription methods. , 1988, Ear and hearing.
[30] R Plomp,et al. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] B C Moore,et al. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids. , 1988, British journal of audiology.
[32] F K Kuk,et al. The effects of "noise suppression" hearing aids on consonant recognition in speech-babble and low-frequency noise. , 1989, Ear and hearing.
[33] J M Festen,et al. The effect of varying the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] Speech levels at the ear of a talker and their implication for a hearing‐impaired person taking part in a discussion , 1990 .
[35] F K Kuk,et al. Subjective ratings of noise-reduction hearing aids. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.
[36] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] P. A. Yantis,et al. The effect of automatic gain control in hearing-impaired listeners with different dynamic ranges. , 1990, Ear and hearing.
[38] R J Stubbs,et al. Algorithms for separating the speech of interfering talkers: evaluations with voiced sentences, and normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] A. Macleod,et al. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. , 1990, British journal of audiology.
[40] B C Moore,et al. Characterization and Simulation of Impaired Hearing: Implications for Hearing Aid Design , 1991, Ear and hearing.
[41] R M Cox,et al. Hearing aid benefit in everyday environments. , 1991, Ear and hearing.
[42] A Ringdahl,et al. Sound quality and speech reception for prescribed hearing aid frequency responses. , 1991, Ear and hearing.
[43] C A Sammeth,et al. A Review of Current “Noise Reduction” Hearing Aids: Rationale, Assumptions, and Efficacy , 1991, Ear and hearing.
[44] J Kiessling,et al. Clinical evaluation of a programmable three-channel automatic gain control amplification system. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[45] J M Festen,et al. The effect of frequency-selective attenuation on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in conditions of low-frequency noise. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] T P Barron,et al. Frequency response differences of four gain-equalized hearing aid prescription formulae. , 1992, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[47] J R Dubno,et al. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[48] D Byrne. Key issues in hearing aid selection and evaluation. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[49] J Verschuure,et al. Effect of hearing aids on speech perception in noisy situations. , 1992, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[50] L P Sherlock,et al. Performance with an adaptive frequency response hearing aid in a sample of elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 1992, Ear and hearing.
[51] D Benson,et al. Patient experiences with multiband full dynamic range compression. , 1992, Ear and hearing.
[52] C M Rankovic,et al. Potential benefits of adaptive frequency-gain characteristics for speech reception in noise. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[53] W A Dreschler,et al. The effects of input-output configuration in syllabic compression on speech perception. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[54] G F Smoorenburg,et al. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] W Soede,et al. Assessment of a directional microphone array for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.