Performance evaluation of Chinese port enterprises under significant environmental concerns: An extended DEA-based analysis

Abstract The rapid development of China’s port industry has caused numerous problems, among which the most significant is environmental pollution. A major goal for government and port enterprises alike is the achievement of both effective environmental protection and operational efficiency. Therefore, environmental factors should be considered when evaluating port efficiency. However, most of the available data envelopment analysis (DEA) models that have been used in previous studies enable each decision-making unit (DMU) to choose its favorite weight-combination with a rather careless approach. This may have caused some DMUs with very good economic indexes but very poor environmental indexes to be evaluated as fully efficient. This paper proposes a non-radial DEA preference model, based on the assumption of variable returns to scale (VRS) and the Directional Distance Function (DDF). The proposed model has been used to evaluate and analyze the efficiency of Chinese-listed port enterprises. The efficiency results showed the average efficiency to be low for all ports when environmental factors are considered. The regression results show that port assets, berth quantity, and the geographical location can significantly impact the environmental performance of Chinese port enterprises. This study also classified all ports into four categories, based on throughput and efficiency. Recommendations for the implementation for improvements of different environmental policies have been made for the individual ports in each category based on the actual situation of each port.

[1]  Susan X. Li Stochastic models and variable returns to scales in data envelopment analysis , 1998 .

[2]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  K. Tone,et al.  A multistage method to measure efficiency and its application to Japanese banking industry , 2008 .

[4]  Zhiqiang Zheng,et al.  A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to Estimate IT-Enabled Production Capability , 2017, MIS Q..

[5]  C. Barros,et al.  Efficiency in European Seaports with DEA: Evidence from Greece and Portugal , 2004 .

[6]  Jie Wu,et al.  Performance Based Clustering for Benchmarking of Container Ports: an Application of Dea and Cluster Analysis Technique , 2010 .

[7]  Carlos Pestana Barros,et al.  Productivity analysis of Brazilian seaports , 2012 .

[8]  Lawrence Olson,et al.  Specification and Estimation of a Simultaneous-Equation Model with Limited Dependent Variables , 1978 .

[9]  R. Färe,et al.  Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency , 1998 .

[10]  Jie Wu,et al.  Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights , 2013 .

[11]  Leonardo Ramos Rios,et al.  Analysing the Relative Efficiency of Container Terminals of Mercosur using DEA , 2006 .

[12]  Valentin Zelenyuk,et al.  Pricing of decision-making units under non-constant returns to scale , 2015, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  Zinan Liu,et al.  THE COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENTERPRISES: THE CASE OF BRITISH PORTS. , 1995 .

[14]  Peter Wanke,et al.  New evidence on the determinants of efficiency at Brazilian ports: a bootstrapped DEA analysis , 2016 .

[15]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Modal choice between air and rail: a social efficiency benchmarking analysis that considers CO2 emissions , 2011 .

[16]  Young-Tae Chang,et al.  Evaluating economic and environmental efficiency of global airlines: A SBM-DEA approach , 2014 .

[17]  Anthony T.H. Chin,et al.  Port performance in Asia: Does production efficiency imply environmental efficiency? , 2010 .

[18]  Ye Li,et al.  An empirical study on the influencing factors of transportation carbon efficiency: Evidences from fifteen countries , 2015 .

[19]  Young-Tae Chang,et al.  Environmental efficiency of ports: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach , 2013 .

[20]  Augusto Voltes-Dorta,et al.  Benchmarking the noise-oriented efficiency of major European airports: A directional distance function approach , 2016 .

[21]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[22]  Halina M. Zaleski,et al.  Technical, allocative and economic efficiencies in swine production in Hawaii: a comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches , 1999 .

[23]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  C. Barros A Benchmark Analysis of Italian Seaports Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2006 .

[25]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation , 2010 .

[26]  Terry Barker,et al.  Effects of decarbonising international shipping and aviation on climate mitigation and air pollution , 2014 .

[27]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With Dea-Solver Software and References , 2005 .

[28]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Tengfei Wang,et al.  The efficiency analysis of container port production using DEA panel data approaches , 2010, OR Spectr..

[30]  Waiman Cheung,et al.  Foreign participation and competition: A way to improve the container port efficiency in China? , 2013 .

[31]  Qingyuan Zhu,et al.  Eco-design of transportation in sustainable supply chain management: A DEA-like method , 2016 .

[32]  Jie Wu,et al.  Groups in DEA based cross-evaluation: An application to Asian container ports , 2009 .

[33]  Jie Wu,et al.  DEA models for identifying sensitive performance measures in container port evaluation , 2010 .

[34]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[35]  Martin Dresner,et al.  NORTH AMERICAN CONTAINERPORT PRODUCTIVITY: 1984-1997 , 2004 .

[36]  Jie Wu,et al.  The impacts of public sustainability concerns on length of product line , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Jose L. Tongzon,et al.  Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[38]  Malin Song,et al.  Railway transportation and environmental efficiency in China , 2016 .

[39]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  Have Chinese cities achieved the win–win between environmental protection and economic development? From the perspective of environmental efficiency , 2015 .

[40]  Jie Wu,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of China's regional energy saving and emission reduction efficiency: From production and treatment perspectives , 2015 .

[41]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Production Frontier Methodologies and Efficiency as a Performance Measure in Strategic Management Research , 2013 .

[42]  Peter Wanke,et al.  Determinants of Efficiency at Major Brazilian Port Terminals , 2011 .

[43]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China:A non-radial DEA approach , 2013 .

[44]  Photis M. Panayides,et al.  The relative efficiency of shipping companies , 2011 .

[45]  William L. Weber,et al.  A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency , 2009 .

[46]  Wayne K. Talley,et al.  Port economic cost functions: A service perspective , 2016 .

[47]  M. Molinos-Senante,et al.  Productivity change of the Spanish Port System: impact of the economic crisis , 2016 .

[48]  Guo Li,et al.  Allocation of emission permits for China’s power plants: A systemic Pareto optimal method , 2017 .

[49]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  The Application of Mathematical Programming Approaches to Estimating Container Port Production Efficiency , 2005 .

[50]  Peter Wanke,et al.  Physical infrastructure and shipment consolidation efficiency drivers in Brazilian ports: A two-stage network-DEA approach , 2013 .

[51]  Y Roll,et al.  Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 1993 .

[52]  Hua Su,et al.  Using MODIS data to estimate sea ice thickness in the Bohai Sea (China) in the 2009-2010 winter , 2012 .

[53]  Gi-Tae Yeo,et al.  Environmental efficiency analysis of port cities: Slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis approach , 2014 .

[54]  Peter Wanke,et al.  Assessing productive efficiency in Nigerian airports using Fuzzy-DEA , 2016 .

[55]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[56]  Girish Gujar,et al.  On balancing supply chain efficiency and environmental impacts: An eco-DEA model applied to the dry port sector of India , 2012 .

[57]  Eduardo Martínez-Budría,et al.  A STUDY OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SPANISH PORT AUTHORITIES USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[58]  Ling Li,et al.  The utility of returns to scale in DEA programming: An analysis of Michigan rural hospitals , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[59]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[60]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Reprint of “Planning in feasible region by two-stage target-setting DEA methods: An application in green supply chain management of public transportation service providers” , 2014 .

[61]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance , 2006 .

[62]  Spyros Niavis,et al.  Ranking and causes of inefficiency of container seaports in South-Eastern Europe , 2012, European Transport Research Review.

[63]  A. Manello,et al.  The influence of fleet mix, ownership and LCCs on airports’ technical/environmental efficiency , 2013 .

[64]  Mark Goh,et al.  Container port efficiency in emerging and more advanced markets , 2010 .

[65]  Christoph Teller,et al.  Analyzing the Efficient Execution of In‐Store Logistics Processes in Grocery Retailing—The Case of Dairy Products , 2013 .

[66]  Guo Li,et al.  Impact of emission regulation policies on Chinese power firms’ reusable environmental investments and sustainable operations , 2017 .

[67]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[68]  Da Huo,et al.  Assessing Energy Efficiency of Port Operations in China—A Case Study on Sustainable Development of Green Ports , 2015 .

[69]  Jiasen Sun,et al.  Allocation of emission permits in large data sets: a robust multi-criteria approach , 2017 .

[70]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[71]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  Measurement and decomposition of energy-saving and emissions reduction performance in Chinese cities , 2015 .

[72]  Wayne K. Talley,et al.  Shipping finance and port issues , 2004 .

[73]  Peter Wanke,et al.  Efficiency in Chinese seaports: 2002–2012 , 2015 .

[74]  Somchai Pathomsiri,et al.  Limitations of DEA-based approach and alternative methods in the measurement and comparison of social efficiency across firms in different transport modes: An empirical study in Japan , 2013 .

[75]  Malin Song,et al.  Calculation of China's environmental efficiency and relevant hierarchical cluster analysis from the perspective of regional differences , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[76]  Cecilio Mar-Molinero,et al.  A variable returns to scale data envelopment analysis model for the joint determination of efficiencies with an example of the UK health service , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[77]  David A. Belsley Two- or three-stage least squares? , 1988 .

[78]  Peter Wanke,et al.  Public-private partnerships and scale efficiency in Brazilian ports: Evidence from two-stage DEA analysis ☆ , 2015 .