A finite element comparison between the mechanical behaviour of rigid and resilient oral implants with respect to immediate loading

In this paper, a qualitative comparison between two types of dental implants with respect to their behaviour under immediate loading is presented. This analysis has been carried out using the finite element method. Since micromotions (and not the load) are responsible of the appearance of a fibrous interface avoiding osseointegration, the relative displacement between the bone surface and the implant has been the main variable analyzed at different loading states and for the two implant types here considered. The implants analyzed differ in their mechanical behavior: rigid or resilient. Their main difference lies in the joining between the different pieces that make up the dental system. While in the rigid implant all the pieces are screwed, in the resilient implant a relative displacement between the pieces is allowed, with the additional introduction of a silicone gasket that acts like the periodontal ligament. Both implants were considered with a similar geometry and under two different loading scenarios, one equivalent to the force of chewing applied to a molar and another which corresponds to a premolar. For the resilient implant, a hyperelastic behaviour for the silicone and contact conditions between the different mobile parts of the implant are considered. The displacements of the emerging-body in both designs are also compared with the values obtained by several authors. However, the results show that both implants fulfill the constraint of the immediate loading protocol. The micromotions of the resilient implant are lower to those of the rigid one, favouring therefore a good osseointegration process while keeping the stresses in the implant under admissible maximum values.