Should We Be Wary of Mitigation Banking? Evidence Regarding the Risks Associated with this Wetland Offset Arrangement in Florida

This paper describes and analyzes the risks associated with using mitigation banking for the conservation of wetlands in Florida in the United States. First, we attempt to identify and summarize the main ecological and socio-economic risks regarding mitigation banking that have been discussed in previous studies. Then we analyze the institutional responses adopted by US regulators to limit these risks. We have used empirical evidence including interviews and data analysis to assess the effectiveness of these responses. Our main findings are that the recent regulatory responses adopted to face risks associated with mitigation banking seem to be more effective than what is often assumed. These responses are underpinned by the emergence of a hybrid mode of governance that combines market characteristics and regulatory constraints, and which contributes to enforcing wetland compensation in Florida. However, we also observed some risks inherent in this system, in particular the redistribution of ecosystem services, as the distance between impact sites and compensation sites seems to have increased in Florida in the last several years. In addition, the question is still pending regarding whether or not No Net Loss of wetlands is really achieved through mitigation banking.

[1]  Coralie Calvet,et al.  Investigating the inclusion of ecosystem services in biodiversity offsetting , 2016 .

[2]  N. Castree.  Neoliberalism and the Biophysical Environment 1: What ‘Neoliberalism’ is, and What Difference Nature Makes to it , 2010 .

[3]  D. Pearce,et al.  Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability , 1993 .

[4]  James E. Salzman,et al.  The Effects of Wetland Mitigation Banking on People , 2006 .

[5]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Conservation: Stop misuse of biodiversity offsets , 2015, Nature.

[6]  T. BenDor,et al.  Estimating the Size and Impact of the Ecological Restoration Economy , 2015, PloS one.

[7]  Morgan M. Robertson,et al.  Evaluation of a Market in Wetland Credits: Entrepreneurial Wetland Banking in Chicago , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  Chris Wilcox,et al.  FORUM: Perverse incentives risk undermining biodiversity offset policies , 2015 .

[9]  Sarah A. Bekessy,et al.  The ethics of offsetting nature , 2015 .

[10]  P. Ekins.  Identifying critical natural capital - Conclusions about critical natural capital , 2003 .

[11]  Harold Levrel,et al.  L’émergence du marché de la compensation des zones humides aux États-Unis : impacts sur les modes d’organisation et les caractéristiques des transactions , 2013 .

[12]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Rapid Recovery of Damaged Ecosystems , 2009, PloS one.

[13]  H. Levrel,et al.  Biodiversity offsetting: Clearing up misunderstandings between conservation and economics to take further action , 2017 .

[14]  T. BenDor,et al.  Assessing the Socioeconomic Impacts of Wetland Mitigation in the Chicago Region , 2007 .

[15]  Todd K. BenDor,et al.  Risk and markets for ecosystem services. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank , 2010 .

[17]  N. Kaldor.  The Philosophy of Economics: Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility , 1939 .

[18]  Alfred Herberg,et al.  Mitigation banking and compensation pools: improving the effectiveness of impact mitigation regulation in project planning procedures , 2005 .

[19]  Benoît Dauguet.  Biodiversity offsetting as a commodification process: A French case study as a concrete example , 2015 .

[20]  J. Boyd.  Compensating for Wetland Losses under the Clean Water Act , 2002 .

[21]  Morgan M. Robertson.  The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance , 2004 .

[22]  Douglas J Spieles,et al.  Community Structure and Quality After 10 Years in Two Central Ohio Mitigation Bank Wetlands , 2006, Environmental management.

[23]  T. Dahl,et al.  Restoration Outcomes and Reporting: An Assessment of Wetland Area Gains in Wisconsin, USA , 2016, Ecological Restoration.

[24]  J. Hicks.  The Foundations of Welfare Economics , 1939 .

[25]  William G. Lee,et al.  Why bartering biodiversity fails , 2009 .

[26]  M. Mauss.  The gift : Forms and functions of exchange in Archaic Societies / Marcel Mauss , 2020 .

[27]  J. Christie,et al.  Various state reactions to the swancc decision , 2003, Wetlands.

[28]  Todd K. BenDor,et al.  A survey of entrepreneurial risk in U.S. wetland and stream compensatory mitigation markets , 2011 .

[29]  Ow Us Epa.  Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources; Final Rule , 2015 .

[30]  Palmer Hough,et al.  Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: where it comes from, what it means , 2009, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[31]  Christopher A. Barnes,et al.  Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. , 2011 .

[32]  Jean-Baptiste Fressoz.  Payer pour polluer. L’industrie chimique et la compensation des dommages environnementaux, 1800-1850 , 2013 .

[33]  M. Power,et al.  Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems , 2012, PLoS biology.

[34]  Harold Levrel,et al.  No net loss of biodiversity or paper offsets? A critical review of the French no net loss policy , 2014 .

[35]  T. BenDor,et al.  Land Use Planning and Social Equity in North Carolina’s Compensatory Wetland and Stream Mitigation Programs , 2011, Environmental management.

[36]  N. Castree.  Neoliberalising Nature: The Logics of Deregulation and Reregulation , 2008 .

[37]  R. Bayón,et al.  The business of biodiversity , 2010, Nature.

[38]  H. Levrel,et al.  Biodiversity offset markets: What are they really? An empirical approach to wetland mitigation banking , 2015 .

[39]  Clive L. Spash,et al.  Bulldozing biodiversity: The economics of offsets and trading-in Nature , 2015 .