In this article we describe some innovative methods for observing the possible impacts of roads, junctions and pathways (movement infrastructures), on community life in terms of their affordances and hindrances for social connectivity. In seeking to observe these impacts, we combined a range of visualization research methods, based on qualitative points-data mapping, graphic representation and urban morphological analysis at local and global geographic scales. Our overall aim in this study was to develop exploratory methods for combining and visualizing various kinds of data that relate to urban community formations in contrasting urban contexts. We focused our enquiry on the perspectives of adolescents in two urban contexts: Liverpool, UK, and Medellin, Colombia. While they contrast in their geo-political and cultural characteristics, these two cities each present polarized socio-economic inequalities across distinctive spatial patterns. We found that adolescents in these cities offer generally localized, pedestrian perspectives of their local areas, and unique insights into the opportunities and challenges for place-making in their local community spaces. We gathered the communities’ local perspectives through map-making workshops, in which participants used given iconographic symbols to select and weight the social and structural assets that they deemed to be significant features of their community spaces. We then sampled and visualized these selective points data to observe ways in which local community assets relate to infrastructural affordances for movement (in terms of network integration). This analysis was based on the theory and method of Space Syntax, which provides a model of affordances for movement across the urban network over various scales of network configuration. In particular, we sought to determine how city-scale movement infrastructures interact with local-scale infrastructures, and to develop methods for observing ways in which these interactions have positive or negative consequences for community formations.
[1]
Gabrielle Gwyther.
Paradise Planned: Community Formation and the Master Planned Estate
,
2005
.
[2]
S. Psarra,et al.
The dialogic city: towards a synthesis of physical and conceptual artefacts in urban community configurations
,
2015
.
[3]
Jennifer S. Mindell,et al.
Urban transport and community severance: linking research and policy to link people and places
,
2016
.
[4]
J. Dávila,et al.
Mobility innovation at the urban margins
,
2011
.
[5]
J. O'Brien,et al.
Relating Urban Morphologies To Movement Potentials Over Time: A diachronic study with Space Syntax of Liverpool, UK
,
2017
.
[6]
Rick Grannis.
The Importance of Trivial Streets: Residential Streets and Residential Segregation1
,
1998,
American Journal of Sociology.
[7]
Herbert J. Gans.
Jane Jacobs: Toward an Understanding of “Death and Life of Great American Cities”
,
2006
.
[8]
John R Logan,et al.
Making a Place for Space: Spatial Thinking in Social Science.
,
2012,
Annual review of sociology.
[9]
H. Gans.
The Sociology of Space: A Use–Centered View
,
2002
.
[10]
Bill Hillier,et al.
Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement
,
2005,
COSIT.
[11]
Laura Vaughan,et al.
URBAN RHYTHMS: historic housing evolution and socio‐spatial boundaries
,
2012
.
[12]
Bill Hillier,et al.
The city as one thing
,
2007
.
[13]
R. Sampson,et al.
ASSESSING "NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS": Social Processes and New Directions in Research
,
2002
.
[14]
Andrew Hudson-Smith,et al.
Ensuring VGI Credibility in Urban-Community Data Generation: A Methodological Research Design
,
2016
.
[15]
J. Robinson.
Comparative Urbanism: New Geographies and Cultures of Theorizing the Urban
,
2016
.