Hydrological field data from a modeller's perspective: Part 1. Diagnostic tests for model structure

Hydrological scientists develop perceptual models of the catchments they study, using field measurements and observations to build an understanding of the dominant processes controlling the hydrological response. However, conceptual and numerical models used to simulate catchment behaviour often fail to take advantage of this knowledge. It is common instead to use a pre-defined model structure which can only be fitted to the catchment via parameter calibration. In this article, we suggest an alternative approach where different sources of field data are used to build a synthesis of dominant hydrological processes and hence provide recommendations for representing those processes in a time-stepping simulation model. Using analysis of precipitation, flow and soil moisture data, recommendations are made for a comprehensive set of modelling decisions, including Evapotranspiration (ET) parameterization, vertical drainage threshold and behaviour, depth and water holding capacity of the active soil zone, unsaturated and saturated zone model architecture and deep groundwater flow behaviour. The second article in this two-part series implements those recommendations and tests the capability of different model sub-components to represent the observed hydrological processes. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Paul Quinn,et al.  Scale appropriate modelling: representing cause-and-effect relationships in nitrate pollution at the catchment scale for the purpose of catchment scale planning , 2004 .

[2]  Karin Laursen,et al.  A conceptual model of preferential flow systems in forested hillslopes: evidence of self‐organization , 2001 .

[3]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  Optimization of Soil Hydraulic Model Parameters Using Synthetic Aperture Radar Data: An Integrated Multidisciplinary Approach , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system , 2002 .

[5]  M. Stewart,et al.  Hydrometric and natural tracer (oxygen‐18, silica, tritium and sulphur hexafluoride) evidence for a dominant groundwater contribution to Pukemanga Stream, New Zealand , 2007 .

[6]  A perspective on hillslope hydrology in the context of PUB , 2005 .

[7]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Conceptualizing catchment processes: simply too complex? , 2008 .

[8]  Keith Beven,et al.  Using interactive recession curve analysis to specify a general catchment storage model , 1997 .

[9]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty , 2006 .

[10]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Catchment data for process conceptualization: simply not enough? , 2008 .

[11]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Impacts of uncertain river flow data on rainfall‐runoff model calibration and discharge predictions , 2010 .

[12]  George Kuczera,et al.  Calibration of conceptual hydrological models revisited: 1. Overcoming numerical artefacts , 2006 .

[13]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models , 2008 .

[14]  T. McMahon,et al.  Experimental Design and Initial Results from the Mahurangi River Variability Experiment: MARVEX , 2013 .

[15]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  ''Catchment modelling: towards an improved representation of the hydrological processes in real-world model applications'' , 2004 .

[16]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Soil Surface Water Content Estimation by Full-Waveform GPR Signal Inversion in the Presence of Thin Layers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  G. H. Leavesley,et al.  Precipitation-runoff modeling system; user's manual , 1983 .

[18]  Malcolm Newson,et al.  Plynlimon research: The first two decades , 1991 .

[19]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Stormflow generation in steep forested headwaters: a linked hydrogeomorphic paradigm , 2000 .

[20]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Learning from model improvement: On the contribution of complementary data to process understanding , 2008 .

[21]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis , 2006 .

[22]  Yuqiong Liu,et al.  Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation , 2008 .

[23]  Jim E Freer,et al.  Hydrological Dynamics of the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia , 2003 .

[24]  J. Szilágyi Comment on “Power law catchment‐scale recessions arising from heterogeneous linear small‐scale dynamics” by C. J. Harman, M. Sivapalan, and P. Kumar , 2009 .

[25]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology , 2007 .

[26]  Peter Lehmann,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Rainfall Threshold for Hillslope Outflow: an Emergent Property of Flow Pathway Connectivity , 2022 .

[27]  Brian L. McGlynn,et al.  A review of the evolving perceptual model of hillslope flowpaths at the Maimai catchments, New Zealand , 2002 .

[28]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Comment to “Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes, Journal of Hydrology 286: 113 134” , 2005 .

[29]  M. Sklash,et al.  A conceptual model of watershed response to rainfall, developed through the use of oxygen-18 as a natural tracer , 1976 .

[30]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Power law catchment‐scale recessions arising from heterogeneous linear small‐scale dynamics , 2009 .

[31]  R. Grayson,et al.  A downward approach to identifying the structure and parameters of a process‐based model for a small experimental catchment , 2003 .

[32]  P. Matgen,et al.  Understanding catchment behavior through stepwise model concept improvement , 2008 .

[33]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: Transferring reach‐ and plot‐scale understanding to the catchment scale , 2009 .

[34]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes , 2004 .

[35]  R. Grayson,et al.  Scaling of Soil Moisture: A Hydrologic Perspective , 2002 .

[36]  J. Kirchner Catchments as simple dynamical systems: Catchment characterization, rainfall‐runoff modeling, and doing hydrology backward , 2009 .

[37]  M. Stewart,et al.  Estimating Rainfall Recharge and Soil Water Residence Times in Pukekohe, New Zealand, by Combining Geophysical, Chemical, and Isotopic Methods , 1999 .

[38]  George Kuczera,et al.  Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: A case study using Bayesian total error analysis , 2009 .

[39]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Is the groundwater reservoir linear? Learning from data in hydrological modelling , 2005 .

[40]  John S. Selker,et al.  Information, artifacts, and noise in dQ/dt − Q recession analysis , 2006 .

[41]  K. Beven Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[42]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review , 1995 .

[43]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Reply to comment by J. Szilagyi on “Power law catchment‐scale recessions arising from heterogeneous linear small‐scale dynamics” , 2009 .

[44]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Reply to comment by Tromp van Meerveld and McDonnell on Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes , 2005 .

[45]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Improving perceptual and conceptual hydrological models using data from small basins , 2009 .

[46]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling , 2000 .

[47]  The significance and lag-time of deep through flow: an example from a small, ephemeral catchment with contrasting soil types in the Adelaide Hills, South Australia , 2009 .

[48]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Conceptualization in catchment modelling: simply learning? , 2008 .

[49]  M. K. Stewart,et al.  Landuse effects on runoff generating processes in tussock grassland indicated by mean transit time estimation using tritium , 2010 .

[50]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Towards a simple dynamic process conceptualization in rainfall–runoff models using multi-criteria calibration and tracers in temperate, upland catchments , 2009 .

[51]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Predicting space–time variability of hourly streamflow and the role of climate seasonality: Mahurangi Catchment, New Zealand , 2003 .

[52]  Mary S. Lear,et al.  Spatial distribution of soil moisture over 6 and 30 cm depth, Mahurangi river catchment, New Zealand , 2003 .

[53]  W. W. Wood,et al.  Chemical and Isotopic Methods for Quantifying Ground‐Water Recharge in a Regional, Semiarid Environment , 1995 .

[54]  H. Wittenberg Baseflow recession and recharge as nonlinear storage processes , 1999 .

[55]  J. Freer,et al.  Consistency between hydrological models and field observations: linking processes at the hillslope scale to hydrological responses at the watershed scale , 2009 .

[56]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Dominant physical controls on hourly flow predictions and the role of spatial variability: Mahurangi catchment, New Zealand , 2003 .

[57]  Ross Woods,et al.  Increased flexibility in base flow modelling using a power law transmissivity profile , 2008 .

[58]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Scale and scaling in hydrology , 2004 .

[59]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  HESS Opinions "The art of hydrology" , 2008 .

[60]  L. Tallaksen A review of baseflow recession analysis , 1995 .

[61]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Effect of vertical resolution on predictions of transpiration in water-limited ecosystems , 2004 .

[62]  Kellie B. Vaché,et al.  A process‐based rejectionist framework for evaluating catchment runoff model structure , 2006 .

[63]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147‐storm analysis of the Panola hillslope , 2006 .