Binary trading relations and the limits of EDI standards: the Procrustean bed of standards

This paper provides a critical examination of electronic data interchange (EDI) standards and their application in different types of trading relationships. It argues that EDI standards are not directly comparable to more stable sets of technical standards in that they are dynamically tested and negotiated in use with each trading exchange. It takes the position that EDI standards are an emergent language form and must mean different things at the institutional and local levels. Using the lens of emergent linguistic analysis it shows how the institutional and local levels must always be distinct and yet can coexist. EDI standards can never represent the creation of an ‘Esperanto of institutional communication’. Instead we believe that standards must be developed such that they support and accommodate general basic grammatical forms that can be customised to individual needs. The analysis is supported by a set of exemplary cases.

[1]  J Hørlück,et al.  The pragmatics of electronic data interchange: The use of EDI will unify business procedures , 1994 .

[2]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[3]  David R. Mackay,et al.  The impact of EDI on the components sector of the Australian automotive industry , 1993, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Coordination Through Committees and Markets , 1987 .

[5]  Peter Bøgh Andersen,et al.  Language, Perspectives and Design , 1992 .

[6]  Terence A. Oliva.  Technological choice under conditions of changing network externality , 1994 .

[7]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Contours of diffusion of electronic data interchange in Finland: Overcoming technological barriers and collaborating to make it happen , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Hong Kong's EDI bandwagon derailed or on the right track? , 1997 .

[9]  Paul Ati ' Ewell.  TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[10]  Eric Brousseau,et al.  EDI and inter-firm relationships: toward a standardization of coordination processes? , 1994 .

[11]  C. Cunningham,et al.  Electronic trading, interorganizational systems and the nature of buyer-seller relationships: The need for a network perspective , 1993 .

[12]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Growing systems in emergent organizations , 1999, CACM.

[13]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods , 2000 .

[14]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Overcoming EDI Adoption and Implementation Risks , 1999, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[15]  Hagen K. C. Pfeiffer,et al.  The Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange , 1992 .

[16]  Airi Salminen.  Reflections on EDIFACT: Seven issues for the future international EDI message standardization , 1994, ECIS.

[17]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  P. David.  Why are institutions the ‘carriers of history’?: Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions , 1994 .

[19]  Paul Quintas,et al.  Programmed Innovation? Trajectories of Change in Software Development , 1994 .

[20]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[21]  Janice H. Hammond,et al.  Channel Transformation: Improving Supply-chain Performance by Redesigning Channel Replenishment Processes , 1995 .

[22]  Jon Turner,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange Concepts and Issues , 1995 .

[23]  R. Brandis.  The Limits of Organization , 1975 .

[24]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[25]  William Eugene Moen.  The development of ANSI/NISO Z39.50: a case study in standards evolution , 1998 .

[26]  Gilbert Probst,et al.  Self-Organization and Management of Social Systems , 1984 .

[27]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Growing systems in an emergent organization , 2001 .

[28]  H. Foerster,et al.  Principles of Self-Organization — In a Socio-Managerial Context , 1984 .

[29]  N. Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  EDI in Europe: How It Works in Practice , 1995 .

[30]  Kaiyin Huang,et al.  Electronic Commerce for Trade Efficiency and Effectiveness , 1996 .

[31]  Charles R. McClure,et al.  The Development of Ansi/niso Z39.50: a Case Study in Standards Evolution , 1999 .

[32]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Building Electronic Commerce Infrastructure: the Hong Kong Retail Sector (A) , 1998 .

[33]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Beyond business process redesign: redefining Baxter's business network. , 1992, Sloan management review.

[34]  Mari Sako,et al.  SUPPLIERS' ASSOCIATIONS IN THE JAPANESE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY: COLLECTIVE ACTION FOR TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION , 1996 .

[35]  Airi Salminen.  EDIFACT for business computers: has it succeeded? , 1995, STAN.

[36]  SalminenAiri.  EDIFACT for business computers , 1995 .

[37]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Role of Intermediating Institutions in the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): How Industry Associations Intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[38]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Deep structure or emergence theory: contrasting theoretical foundations for information systems development , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[39]  PARADOXE DE L'AUTORÉFÉRENCE,et al.  Speech acts or communicative action , 1991 .

[40]  Duane P. Truex,et al.  Information systems development in the emergent organization , 1993 .

[41]  Juliet Webster,et al.  Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[42]  O. Williamson.  Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[43]  F. Geyer,et al.  Sociocybernetic paradoxes : observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems , 1988 .

[44]  Ho Geun Lee,et al.  EDI-Enabled Channel Transformation: Extending Business Process Redesign beyond the Firm , 1997, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[45]  E. Jantsch.  The self-organizing universe : scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution , 1980 .

[46]  P. David,et al.  The economics of gateway technology and network evolution: lessons from electricity supply history , 1988 .

[47]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .