Effects of Silicone Surfactant on the Properties of Open‐Cell Flexible Polyurethane Foams

In this paper, the effects of silicone surfactant on the mechanical, thermal, and acoustical properties of flexible polyurethane foams are studied. At first, by introducing the reactions of the foam production and expressing the stoichiometric relationships, a method is provided to select the amounts of the basic compounds for getting the desirable properties. By knowing the OH number of polyol and the NCO content of isocyanate after selecting an amount of a blowing agent for the reaction, the quantity of each compound to produce the desirable foam can be found. Then different foams with various amounts of surfactant are produced. By preparing proper samples, the mechanical, thermal, nonacoustical, and acoustical properties of the foams are measured or calculated by using different instruments. The nonacoustical properties are obtained based on two distinct methods, i.e., a semiphenomenological method and an indirect method. The obtained properties are validated by comparing the calculated theoretical sound absorption coefficients with the measured ones. The results show that with a small increase of surfactant, the acoustical properties of foam samples improve by about 50% without any significant changes in other mechanical and thermal properties of the foams. This improvement results from the variations of reticulation rate and cell size. In addition, the initial desirable porosity and density considered in the stoichiometric relations are fairly achieved in produced samples. These results validate the accuracy of the stoichiometric relations.

[1]  A. Ohadi,et al.  Effects of compression on sound absorption of transversely isotropic fibrous materials at oblique incidence , 2013 .

[2]  N. Atalla,et al.  A semi-phenomenological model to predict the acoustic behavior of fully and partially reticulated polyurethane foams , 2013 .

[3]  Noureddine Atalla,et al.  Effect of the microstructure closed pore content on the acoustic behavior of polyurethane foams , 2011 .

[4]  Arnaud Duval,et al.  Microstructure, transport, and acoustic properties of open-cell foam samples: Experiments and three-dimensional numerical simulations , 2011 .

[5]  A. Rashidi,et al.  Thermal, mechanical and acoustic damping properties of flexible open‐cell polyurethane/multi‐walled carbon nanotube foams: effect of surface functionality of nanotubes , 2011 .

[6]  Joe D. McRae,et al.  Mechanical and acoustic performance of compression‐molded open‐cell polypropylene foams , 2009 .

[7]  S. Choi,et al.  Effects of silicone surfactant on the cell size and thermal conductivity of rigid polyurethane foams by environmentally friendly blowing agents , 2009 .

[8]  S. H. Kim,et al.  Effects of silicon surfactant in rigid polyurethane foams , 2008 .

[9]  D. Khakhar,et al.  Hydraulic resistance of rigid polyurethane foams. I. Effect of different surfactants on foam structure and properties , 2004 .

[10]  Nikolov,et al.  Role of Silicone Surfactant in Flexible Polyurethane Foam. , 1999, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[11]  T. Asano,et al.  Cell distributions in and sound absorption characteristics of flexible polyurethane foams , 1997 .

[12]  Garth L. Wilkes,et al.  Structure-property relationships of flexible polyurethane foams , 1997 .

[13]  Y. Imai,et al.  Studies of acoustical absorption of flexible polyurethane foam , 1982 .

[14]  E. K. Moss Computer Calculation of Urethane Foam Permutations , 1969 .

[15]  M. Owen,et al.  Surface chemistry of polyurethane foam formation: III. Effect of gas diffusion between bubbles and surface viscosity on bubble stability , 1968 .

[16]  M. Owen,et al.  The surface chemistry of polyurethane foam formation , 1967 .

[17]  M. Owen,et al.  The surface chemistry of polyurethane foam formation: II. The role of surface elasticity , 1967 .