The nature and development of experts’ strategy flexibility for solving equations

Largely absent from the emerging literature on flexibility is a consideration of experts’ flexibility. Do experts exhibit strategy flexibility, as one might assume? If so, how do experts perceive that this capacity developed in themselves? Do experts feel that flexibility is an important instructional outcome in school mathematics? In this paper, we describe results from several interviews with experts to explore strategy flexibility for solving equations. We conducted interviews with eight content experts, where we asked a number of questions about flexibility and also engaged the experts in problem solving. Our analysis indicates that the experts that were interviewed did exhibit strategy flexibility in the domain of linear equation solving, but they did not consistently select the most efficient method for solving a given equation. However, regardless of whether these experts used the best method on a given problem, they nevertheless showed an awareness of and an appreciation of efficient and elegant problem solutions. The experts that we spoke to were capable of making subtle judgments about the most appropriate strategy for a given problem, based on factors including mental and rapid testing of strategies, the problem solver’s goals (e.g., efficiency, error-free execution, elegance) and familiarity with a given problem type. Implications for future research on flexibility and on mathematics instruction are discussed.

[1]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Flexibility in Problem Solving: The Case of Equation Solving. , 2008 .

[2]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Developing adaptive expertise: A feasible and valuable goal for (elementary) mathematics education? , 2007 .

[3]  Dorothea P. Simon,et al.  Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.

[4]  A. W. Blöte,et al.  Students' flexibility in solving two-digit addition and subtraction problems : Instruction effects , 2001 .

[5]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  The impact of preservice teachers' content knowledge on their evaluation of students' strategies for solving arithmetic and algebra word problems , 2002 .

[6]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Pre-service Teachers' Preferred Strategies for Solving Arithmetic and Algebra Word Problems , 2003 .

[7]  Ann Dowker,et al.  The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise , 2003 .

[8]  N. Charness,et al.  Expert Performance Its Structure and Acquisition , 2002 .

[9]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Jon R. Star,et al.  The development of flexibility in equation solving , 2006 .

[11]  J. Star Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. , 2005 .

[12]  K. Newton An Extensive Analysis of Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Knowledge of Fractions , 2008 .

[13]  Vadim Andreevich Krutet︠s︡kiĭ The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren , 1976 .

[14]  A Cognitive Model of Experts' Algebraic Solving Methods. , 2003 .

[15]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. , 2007 .

[16]  R. Siegler,et al.  Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Ann Dowker,et al.  Computational estimation strategies of professional mathematicians. , 1992 .

[18]  Jon R. Star,et al.  Developing Teachers Flexibility in Algebra through comparison , 2009 .

[19]  J. Elen,et al.  Conceptualising, investigating and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem solving and learning: a critical review , 2009 .

[20]  Exploring Procedural Flexibility in Struggling Algebra Students , 2009 .

[21]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .