Testing of a workstation efficiency evaluator tool

Abstract This paper presents three studies that test and characterize input errors and their impact on selected outputs of a method and tool to predict shoulder loading and work element time from seated, light assembly workstation layout. Studies examine the impact of 1) different hand loads on shoulder load prediction, 2) potential tool user hand location measurement errors, and 3) tool response to simulated hand location input error. The results of the first study found that predicted shoulder load in response to hand loads from newly created, load specific shoulder load models differed from the original method's base models by an average of 5%–12% within the first 100 g of hand loading and 150%–210% for 1000 g hand loads, depending on the population percentile being predicted. In the second study, average hand location measurement error of participants was within 1 cm of the desired referent value measured from either a virtual or physical workstation. Results in study three showed that the impact of simulated hand location measurement error on average shoulder load and movement time prediction was low ( Relevance to industry This testing of a tool for predicting task time and shoulder loading from layout information in the design-stage of seated, light assembly workstations has shown acceptable performance for light assembly hand loads up to 100 g with an anticipated input error under 1 cm and low output errors for estimated shoulder load and movement time.

[1]  O Karhu,et al.  Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. , 1977, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  J Ekholm,et al.  Isometric strength in flexors, abductors, and external rotators of the shoulder. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  W. P. Neumann,et al.  Ergonomists’ and Engineers’ Views on the Utility of Virtual Human Factors Tools , 2015 .

[4]  G Caragnano,et al.  ERGO-MTM model: an integrated approach to set working times based upon standardized working performance and controlled biomechanical load. , 2012, Work.

[5]  L McAtamney,et al.  RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  Filippo A. Salustri,et al.  Adapting Engineering Design Tools to Include Human Factors , 2014 .

[7]  Jean Pierre Verriest,et al.  Digital Human Modeling Research and Development User Needs Panel , 2005 .

[8]  S M McGill,et al.  Dynamic shoulder flexion strength: for use in occupational risk analysis and clinical assessment. , 1994, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  B. L. Miles,et al.  Design for Manufacture and Assembly , 1998 .

[10]  Ann-Christine Falck,et al.  The impact of poor assembly ergonomics on product quality: A cost–benefit analysis in car manufacturing , 2010 .

[11]  Martin Schmauder,et al.  Good ergonomics and team diversity reduce absenteeism and errors in car manufacturing , 2014, Ergonomics.

[12]  Anthony J. Culyer,et al.  Economic Evaluation of Interventions for Occupational Health and Safety: Developing Good Practice , 2008 .

[13]  J. Dul,et al.  Human factors: spanning the gap between OM and HRM , 2010 .

[14]  Ann-Christine Falck,et al.  The impact of poor assembly ergonomics on product quality: A cost-benefit analysis in car manufacturing: Poor Assembly Ergonomics and Product Quality , 2010 .

[15]  Roland Örtengren,et al.  ErgoSAM: A preproduction risk identification tool , 2005 .

[16]  S S Ulin,et al.  Development and evaluation of an observational method for assessing repetition in hand tasks. , 1997, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[17]  Ralph Bruder,et al.  The European Assembly Worksheet , 2013 .

[18]  E. Occhipinti.  OCRA: a concise index for the assessment of exposure to repetitive movements of the upper limbs. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[19]  Per Langaa Jensen,et al.  Human factors and ergonomics in the planning of production , 2002 .

[20]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. , 2010, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[21]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Production system design elements influencing productivity and ergonomics - A case study of parallel and serial flow strategies , 2006 .

[22]  Ozalp Vayvay,et al.  Ergonomics interventions improve quality in manufacturing: a case study , 2008 .

[23]  J. Leigh,et al.  Economic burden of occupational injury and illness in the United States. , 2011, The Milbank quarterly.

[24]  Paul H.P. Yeow,et al.  Quality, productivity, occupational health and safety and cost effectiveness of ergonomic improvements in the test workstations of an electronic factory , 2003 .

[25]  Linda M. Rose,et al.  Work Environment and the Bottom Line: Survey of Tools Relating Work Environment to Business Results , 2013 .

[26]  Andris Freivalds,et al.  Niebel's Methods, Standards, and Work Design , 2008 .

[27]  Ole Broberg,et al.  Integrating ergonomics into engineering: Empirical evidence and implications for the ergonomists , 2007 .

[28]  Kasper Edwards,et al.  Design of systems for productivity and well being. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[29]  Paul H.P. Yeow,et al.  Productivity and quality improvements, revenue increment, and rejection cost reduction in the manual component insertion lines through the application of ergonomics , 2006 .

[30]  Hal W Hendrick,et al.  Determining the cost-benefits of ergonomics projects and factors that lead to their success. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[31]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  A case study evaluating the ergonomic and productivity impacts of partial automation strategies in the electronics industry , 2002 .

[32]  A. Burdorf,et al.  Health problems lead to considerable productivity loss at work among workers with high physical load jobs. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[33]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Time--a key issue for musculoskeletal health and manufacturing. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.