Endometrial precancer diagnosis by histopathology, clonal analysis, and computerized morphometry

Management of endometrial precancers is compromised by longstanding debate over the natural history of endometrial hyperplasias and inconsistencies in their diagnosis. The recent demonstration that some hyperplasias, like cancers, are phenotypically monoclonal is useful in recognizing biological precancers. A clonal analysis has been undertaken of a series of 93 endometrial tissues and their morphology has been evaluated by subjective diagnostic classification and computerized morphometric analysis. A pathologist's diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia was highly associated with monoclonal growth. Both microsatellite‐stable and microsatellite‐unstable precancers were classified as atypical hyperplasias, indicating overlapping morphologies for these two groups. Diagnosis of non‐atypical endometrial hyperplasias was not reproducible and identified a group of lesions equally likely to be monoclonal as polyclonal. Computerized morphometry resolved these lesions into monoclonal and polyclonal subgroups with a high degree of accuracy and reproducibility. The predictive value of morphometry was dominated by that fraction of the sample which consisted of stroma (volume percentage stroma). This can be measured manually and used to predict monoclonality when below the threshold value of 55%. This study shows that morphometric analysis reproducibly and precisely identifies monoclonal endometrial precancers from histological sections. It may serve, furthermore, to classify accurately lesions judged by pathologists as indeterminate (non‐atypical hyperplasias). The material from this study (available at www.endometrium.org from March 1, 2000) and precisely defined architectural diagnostic criteria provide new tools for diagnostic standardization of endometrial precancers. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Fletcher,et al.  A polymerase chain reaction assay for non-random X chromosome inactivation identifies monoclonal endometrial cancers and precancers. , 1995, The American journal of pathology.

[2]  R. Kurman,et al.  The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of “untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients , 1986 .

[3]  J. Baak The role of computerized morphometric and cytometric feature analysis in endometrial hyperplasia and cancer prognosis , 1995, Journal of cellular biochemistry. Supplement.

[4]  J. Baak,et al.  Nuclear Morphometry in the Determination of the Prognosis of Marked Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia , 1985, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[5]  T. Colgan,et al.  Predicting the outcome of endometrial hyperplasia by quantitative analysis of nuclear features using a linear discriminant function. , 1983, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[6]  G. Mutter,et al.  Allelotype mapping of unstable microsatellites establishes direct lineage continuity between endometrial precancers and cancer. , 1996, Cancer research.

[7]  J. V. Bokhman Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. , 1983, Gynecologic oncology.

[8]  G. Mutter,et al.  PCR bias in amplification of androgen receptor alleles, a trinucleotide repeat marker used in clonality studies. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Use of computerized morphometric analyses of endometrial hyperplasias in the prediction of coexistent cancer. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[11]  G. Mutter,et al.  X chromosome inactivation in the normal female genital tract: implications for identification of neoplasia. , 1995, Cancer research.

[12]  F. Tavassoli,et al.  Endometrial lesions in uteri resected for atypical endometrial hyperplasia. , 1978, American journal of clinical pathology.

[13]  R M Richart,et al.  Association between human papillomavirus type and clonal status of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  C. Crum,et al.  Pitfalls in the diagnosis of endometrial neoplasia. , 1984, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  K. Shroyer,et al.  Analysis of Clonality by Amplification of Short Tandem Repeats: Carcinomas of the Female Reproductive Tract , 1994, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[16]  T. Enomoto,et al.  K-ras mutations appear in the premalignant phase of both microsatellite stable and unstable endometrial carcinogenesis. , 1999, Molecular pathology : MP.

[17]  M. Esteller,et al.  Detection of clonality and genetic alterations in endometrial pipelle biopsy and its surgical specimen counterpart. , 1997, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[18]  P D Bezemer,et al.  Architectural and nuclear morphometrical features together are more important prognosticators in endometrial hyperplasias than nuclear morphometrical features alone , 1988, The Journal of pathology.

[19]  S. Brown,et al.  The precursors of endometrial carcinoma. , 1979, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  R. Kurman,et al.  The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long‐term study of “untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients , 1985 .

[21]  A. Yajima,et al.  Analysis of clonality in human endometriotic cysts based on evaluation of X chromosome inactivation in archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. , 1998, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[22]  Kathleen R. Cho,et al.  Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well-differentiated carcinoma. , 1998, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[23]  G. Mutter,et al.  Uteri of women with endometrial carcinoma contain a histopathological spectrum of monoclonal putative precancers, some with microsatellite instability. , 1996, Cancer research.

[24]  C. Crum,et al.  Monoclonal origin of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and some vulvar hyperplasias. , 1997, The American journal of pathology.