Driving behaviors and accident risk under lifetime license revocation.

This study explored the driving behaviors and crash risk of 768 drivers who were under administrative lifetime driver's license revocation (ALLR). It was found that most of the ALLR offenders (83.2%) were still driving and only a few (16.8%) of them gave up driving completely. Of the offenders still driving, 67.6% experienced encountering a police roadside check, but were not detained or ticketed by the police. Within this group, 50.6% continued driving while encountering a police check, 18.0% of them made an immediate U-turn and 9.5% of them parked and exited their car. As to crash risk, 15.2% of the ALLR offenders had at least one crash experience after the ALLR had been imposed. The results of the logistic regression models showed that the offenders' crash risk while under the ALLR was significantly correlated with their personal characteristics (personal income), penalty status (incarceration, civil compensation and the time elapsed since license revocation), annual distance driven, and needs for driving (working, commuting and driving kids). Low-income offenders were more inclined to have a crash while driving under the ALLR. Offenders penalized by being incarcerated or by paying a high civil compensation drove more carefully and were less of a crash risk under the ALLR. The results also showed there were no differences in crash risk under the ALLR between hit-and-run offences and drunk driving offences or for offenders with a professional license or an ordinary license. Generally, ALLR offenders drove somewhat more carefully and were less of a crash risk (4.3 crashes per million km driven) than legal licensed drivers (23.1 crashes per million km driven). Moreover, they seemed to drive more carefully than drivers who were under short-term license suspension/revocation which previous studies have found.

[1]  Raymond C. Peck THE GENERAL AND SPECIFIC DETERRENT EFFECTS OF DUI SANCTIONS: A REVIEW OF CALIFORNIA'S EXPERIENCE , 1991 .

[2]  S. Rosenbloom TRENDS IN WOMEN'S TRAVEL PATTERNS , 2000 .

[3]  P. S. Hu,et al.  Summary of Travel Trends: 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey , 1992 .

[4]  M K Janke,et al.  Accidents, mileage, and the exaggeration of risk. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  D J Deyoung,et al.  An evaluation of the specific deterrent effects of vehicle impoundment on suspended, revoked, and unlicensed drivers in California. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  G Maycock ACCIDENT LIABILITY AND HUMAN FACTORS - RESEARCHING THE RELATIONSHIP , 1985 .

[7]  E R Vingilis,et al.  Sentence severity and the drinking driver: relationships with traffic safety outcome. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Susan A Ferguson,et al.  Trends in fatal crashes involving female drivers, 1975-1998. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Geoffrey Grime,et al.  Handbook of Road Safety Research , 1987 .

[10]  Ron Van Houten,et al.  A study to measure the incidence of driving under suspension in the Greater Moncton area. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  D I Smith,et al.  SURVEY OF DRIVING BY DISQUALIFIED AND SUSPENDED DRIVERS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA , 1990 .

[12]  Nikiforos Stamatiadis,et al.  Crash involvement of drivers with multiple crashes. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  D J Beirness FEMALE DRIVERS IN CANADA: TRENDS IN ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT. WOMEN, ALCOHOL, DRUGS AND TRAFFIC - PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP, STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN, 29-30 SEPTEMBER, 1988 , 1989 .

[14]  H L Ross,et al.  Effects of license revocation on drunk-driving offenders. , 1988, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Michael A Gebers,et al.  An examination of the characteristics and traffic risks of drivers suspended/revoked for different reasons. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[16]  Rickey L. Williams,et al.  A survey of suspension and revocation effects on the drinking-driving offender , 1984 .

[17]  Robert B Voas,et al.  Vehicle action: effective policy for controlling drunk and other high-risk drivers? , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  H L Ross,et al.  Effects of administrative license revocation on employment. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  D J DeYoung DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION OF A PILOT PROJECT TO BETTER CONTROL DISQUALIFIED DRIVERS , 1990 .

[20]  Chien-Ming Tseng,et al.  Is rigorous punishment effective? A case study of lifetime license revocation in Taiwan. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  V Siskind Does license disqualification reduce reoffence rates? , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  P. S. Hu,et al.  Summary of Travel Trends , 2004 .

[23]  A. Mcknight,et al.  THE EFFECT OF LICENSE SUSPENSION UPON DWI RECIDIVISM , 1991 .

[24]  Rebecca L Olson,et al.  Evaluating the 2003 revised hours-of-service regulations for truck drivers: the impact of time-on-task on critical incident risk. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Scott V Masten,et al.  Problem driver remediation: a meta-analysis of the driver improvement literature. , 2013, Journal of safety research.

[26]  R. E. Hagen,et al.  SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION EFFECTS ON THE DUI OFFENDER , 1980 .

[27]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  A statistical model of individual accident risk prediction using driver record, territory and other biographical factors☆ , 1983 .

[28]  K L Campbell,et al.  Crash involvement rates by driver gender and the role of average annual mileage. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  D W Eby,et al.  ARE WOMEN TAKING MORE RISKS WHILE DRIVING? A LOOK AT MICHIGAN DRIVERS , 2000 .

[30]  R C Peck,et al.  Estimating the exposure and fatal crash rates of suspended/revoked and unlicensed drivers in California. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  D. Parker,et al.  Are aggressive people aggressive drivers? A study of the relationship between self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.