Paying for Biodiversity Conservation Services in Agricultural Landscapes

This paper describes the contract mechanism developed for the Regional Integrated Silvopastoral Ecosystem Management Project, which is being implemented with financing from the Global Environment Facility (GEF). The project is testing the use of the payment-for-service mechanism to encourage the adoption of silvopastoral practices in three countries of Central and South America: Colombia, Costa Rica, and Nicaragua. The project has created a mechanism that pays land users for the global environmental services they are generating, so that the additional income stream makes the proposed practices privately profitable.

[1]  P. Nair,et al.  Silvopastoral research and adoption in Central America: recent findings and recommendations for future directions , 2003, Agroforestry Systems.

[2]  Marta Echavarria,et al.  Financing watershed conservation: the FONAG water fund in Quito, Ecuador. , 2002 .

[3]  Stefano Pagiola,et al.  Paying for water services in Central America: learning from Costa Rica. , 2002 .

[4]  René Poccard-Chapuis,et al.  Crossing spatial analyses and livestock economics to understand deforestation processes in the Brazilian Amazon: the case of Sao Felix do Xingu in South Para , 2002 .

[5]  E. Barbier,et al.  The Economics of the Tropical Timber Trade , 1994 .

[6]  J. Hardner,et al.  Rethinking green consumerism. , 2002, Scientific American.

[7]  Songqing Jin,et al.  Tenure Security and Land-Related Investment: Evidence from Ethiopia , 2003 .

[8]  Gerald Shively,et al.  Measuring the Opportunity Cost of Carbon Sequestration in Tropical Agriculture , 2003, Land Economics.

[9]  M. Wambui,et al.  The hamburger connection , 1994 .

[10]  C. Bruce,et al.  Stefano Pagiola, Joshua Bishop, and Natasha Landell-Mills (Eds), 2002, Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development , 2003 .

[11]  H. P. Binswanger Brazilian policies that encourage deforestation in the Amazon , 1991 .

[12]  S. Pagiola,et al.  Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America , 2005 .

[13]  Stefano Pagiola,et al.  Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica , 2008 .

[14]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Alternatives to slash-and-burn in Indonesia: summary report and synthesis of phase II , 1998 .

[15]  Da. Saunders,et al.  The role of corridors in conservation: what do we know and where do we go? , 1991 .

[16]  S. Fujisaka,et al.  Will intensifying pasture management in Latin America protect forests - or is it the other way around? , 2000 .

[17]  Paul J. Ferraro,et al.  Direct Payments to Conserve Biodiversity , 2002, Science.

[18]  M. Faminow Cattle, deforestation and development in the Amazon: an economic, agronomic and environmental perspective. , 1998 .

[19]  P. Ferraro Global Habitat Protection: Limitations of Development Interventions and a Role for Conservation Performance Payments , 2001 .

[20]  E. Murgueitio SISTEMAS AGROFORESTALES PARA LA PRODUCCION GANADERA EN COLOMBIA 1 , 2000 .

[21]  J. Hewlett,et al.  A REVIEW OF CATCHMENT EXPERIMENTS TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF VEGETATION CHANGES ON WATER YIELD AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION , 1982 .

[22]  R. Schneider Government and the Economy on the Amazon Frontier , 1995 .

[23]  S. Scherr,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Agroforestry to Farmers , 1995 .

[24]  R. Repetto The forest for the trees? : government policies and the misuse of forest resources , 1988 .

[25]  Stefano Pagiola,et al.  Payments for environmental services: From theory to practice , 2006 .

[26]  Stefano Pagiola,et al.  Selling Forest Environmental Services : Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development , 2002 .

[27]  T. Downing Development Or Destruction: The Conversion Of Tropical Forest To Pasture In Latin America , 1992 .

[28]  W. Haber,et al.  Remnant trees and the conservation of biodiversity in Costa Rican pastures , 1998, Agroforestry Systems.

[29]  Philippe Ambrosi,et al.  State and trends of the carbon market 2006 : a focus on Africa , 2006 .

[30]  Dennis Env Mahar Government Policies and Deforestation in Brazil's Amazon Region , 1989 .

[31]  J. Benavides Arboles y arbustos forrajeros en América Central , 1994 .

[32]  R. Tipper Helping indigenous farmers to participate in the international market for carbon services: the case of Scolel Té. , 2002 .

[33]  N. Landell-Mills,et al.  Silver bullet or fools' gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. , 2002 .

[34]  B. Swallow,et al.  Innovation in Natural Resource Management: The Role of Property Rights and Collective Action in Developing Countries , 2002 .

[35]  R. F. Hughes,et al.  The Kyoto protocol and payments for tropical forest: An interdisciplinary method for estimating carbon-offset supply and increasing the feasibility of a carbon market under the CDM , 2000 .

[36]  R. J. Thomas,et al.  Carbon storage by introduced deep-rooted grasses in the South American savannas , 1994, Nature.

[37]  R. Rice Conservation concessions - concept description , 2002 .

[38]  S. Pagiola,et al.  Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Agricultural Development: Toward Good Practice , 1997 .

[39]  Marta Echavarría,et al.  Water user associations in the Cauca Valley: A voluntary mechanism to promote upstream-downstream cooperation in the protection of rural watersheds , 2002 .

[40]  David Kaimowitz,et al.  Livestock and deforestation in Central America in the 1980s and 1990s: a policy perspective , 1995 .

[41]  J. Thiollay The Role of Traditional Agroforests in the Conservation of Rain Forest Bird Diversity in Sumatra , 1995 .

[42]  L. Bruijnzeel,et al.  Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion : a state of knowledge review , 1990 .

[43]  R. Hobbs,et al.  The role of corridors , 1991 .

[44]  G. Daily,et al.  COUNTRYSIDE BIOGEOGRAPHY: USE OF HUMAN-DOMINATED HABITATS BY THE AVIFAUNA OF SOUTHERN COSTA RICA , 2001 .