21 Governance for Responsible Fisheries: an Ecosystem Approach

The term, ‘responsible’ can be interpreted in many ways. For fisheries, we believe responsible means sustainable production of human benefits, which are distributed ‘fairly’, without causing unacceptable changes in marine ecosystems. Governance is broader than fisheries management. It consists of formal and informal rules, and understandings or norms that influence behaviour. Responsible fisheries requires self-governance by the scientific community, the fishing industry and the public (including politicians), as well as responsible fisheries management. An ecosystem approach to fisheries management, also known as ecosystem-based fisheries management, is geographically specified fisheries management that takes account of knowledge and uncertainties about, and among, biotic, abiotic and human components of ecosystems, and strives to balance diverse societal objectives. Much has been written about the principles that should underlie an ecosystem approach to fisheries management. The key elements of the approach should be: (i) goals and constraints that characterize the desired state of fisheries and undesirable ecosystem changes; (ii) conservation measures that are precautionary, take account of species interactions and are adaptive; (iii) allocation of rights to provide incentives for conservation; (iv) decision making that is participatory and transparent; (v) ecosystem protection for habitat and species of special concern; and (vi) management support, including scientific information, enforcement and performance evaluation. Fisheries ecosystem plans are a useful vehicle for designing and implementing fisheries management systems that capture these six elements. Such plans should highlight a hierarchy of management entities, from an ecosystem scale to the local scale of communities; ocean zoning, including marine protected areas (MPAs) and other geographically defined management measures; and specification of authorized fishing activities, with protocols required for future authorizations. The scientific community needs to govern itself so that it produces scientific information that is relevant, responsive, respected and right. A multi-faceted approach is needed, including monitoring of fisheries and ecosystems, assessments and scientific advice tailored to management needs, and strategic research investments to improve monitoring and assessments in the future. One serious problem facing scientists is the controversial nature of assessments and scientific advice. This problem needs to be addressed with a three-pronged strategy that calls for: separation of scientific institutions from management; collaborative research with the fishing industry; and transparent quality assurance of scientific advice. The last-named requires peer review, which either can be integrated into the process of preparing the advice (referred to as integrated peer review) or can be conducted following the preparation of the advice (referred to as sequential peer review). The appearance of potential conflict of interest by peer reviewers is a factor in the credibility of the peer review process. For an ecosystem approach for responsible fisheries, the fishing industry should govern itself to accept responsibility for providing fisheries information, embrace collaborative research, participate in the fishery management process and live with the outcome, comply with regulations, avoid waste and develop training to instil a responsible fishing ethic. Environmentalists and the public in general should also participate © 2003 by FAO. Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem (eds M. Sinclair and G. Valdimarsson)

[1]  E. Miles.  The Concept of Ocean Governance: Evolution Toward the 21st Century and the Principle of Sustainable Ocean Use , 1999 .

[2]  J. Ault,et al.  Management Strategies to Conserve Marine Biodiversity , 1996 .

[3]  D. Pauly,et al.  Fishing down marine food webs , 1998, Science.

[4]  Anthony Charles,et al.  Co-operative Management of Local Fisheries: New Directions for Improved Management and Community Development , 1990 .

[5]  M. Harte.  Opportunities and barriers for industry-led fisheries research , 2001 .

[6]  D. Hancock.  Developing and sustaining world fisheries resources , 1997 .

[7]  Charles F. Cole,et al.  Sustaining Marine Fisheries , 2000 .

[8]  E. K. Pikitch,et al.  Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management , 2004, Science.

[9]  Clarence F. Pautzke,et al.  An ecosystem-based approach for Alaska groundfish fisheries , 2000 .

[10]  Svein Jentoft,et al.  Fisheries co-management: Delegating government responsibility to fishermen's organizations☆☆☆ , 1989 .

[11]  C. Walters,et al.  Is scientific inquiry incompatible with government information control , 1997 .

[12]  J. Steele.  Regime shifts in fisheries management , 1996 .

[13]  C. Roberts.  Ecological advice for the global fisher crisis. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  Evelyn Pinkerton,et al.  Translating Legal Rights into Management Practice: Overcoming Barriers to the Exercise of Co-Management , 1992 .

[15]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Marine Fisheries at a Critical Juncture , 1993 .

[16]  W. Edeson.  Closing the Gap: The Role of ‘Soft’ International Instruments to Control Fishing , 1999 .

[17]  P. Mace,et al.  A Commentary on Western Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Assessments , 1998 .

[18]  Pascal Lorance,et al.  Continental slope and deep-sea fisheries: implications for a fragile ecosystem , 2000 .

[19]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Principles for the conservation of wild living resources , 1997 .

[20]  J. Wallace,et al.  A Pacific Interdecadal Climate Oscillation with Impacts on Salmon Production , 1997 .

[21]  Lawrence Juda,et al.  Considerations in Developing a Functional Approach to the Governance of Large Marine Ecosystems , 1999 .

[22]  L. Hennessey,et al.  Governance Profiles and the Management of the Uses of Large Marine Ecosystems , 2001 .

[23]  M. Tundi Agardy,et al.  Advances in marine conservation: the role of marine protected areas , 1994 .

[24]  K. Sherman,et al.  Sustainability, biomass yields, and health of coastal ecosystems: an ecological perspective , 1994 .

[25]  Paul Pajak.  Sustainability, Ecosystem Management, and Indicators: Thinking Globally and Acting Locally in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[26]  Steven A. Murawski,et al.  Definitions of overfishing from an ecosystem perspective , 2000 .

[27]  T. Pitcher.  Ecosystem goals can reinvigorate fisheries management, help dispute resolution and encourage public support. , 2000 .

[28]  Jeremy S. Collie,et al.  Are multispecies models an improvement on single-species models for measuring fishing impacts on marine ecosystems? , 2000 .

[29]  N. Daan,et al.  Multispecies models relevant to management of living resources , 1990 .

[30]  D. Smith,et al.  Developing and Sustaining World Fisheries Resources : The State of Science and Management : 2nd World Fisheries Congress , 1997 .

[31]  Marc Mangel,et al.  IMPLEMENTING THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IN FISHERIES MANAGEMENT THROUGH MARINE RESERVES , 1998 .

[32]  Tim D. Smith,et al.  Principles for the conservation of wild living resources , 1996 .

[33]  Rögnvaldur Hannesson,et al.  Marine Reserves: What Would They Accomplish? , 1998, Marine Resource Economics.

[34]  P. Mace.  a new role for MSY in single-species and ecosystem approaches to fisheries stock assessment and management , 2001 .

[35]  Steven A. Murawski,et al.  Large-scale closed areas as a fishery-management tool in temperate marine systems : The Georges Bank experience , 2000 .

[36]  P. Mace,et al.  Relationships between Common Biological Reference Points Used as Thresholds and Targets of Fisheries Management Strategies , 1994 .

[37]  D. Boesch.  Marine Pollution in the United States , 2001 .

[38]  Cole,et al.  Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  Jason Link,et al.  Re)Constructing Food Webs and Managing Fisheries , 1999 .

[40]  J. R. Nielsen,et al.  Fisheries co-management: a comparative analysis☆ , 1996 .

[41]  J. Kirkley,et al.  Fishery management techniques: Practical aspects and limitations , 1982 .

[42]  Keith Sainsbury,et al.  Symposium overview: incorporating ecosystem objectives within fisheries management , 2000 .

[43]  Bonnie J. McCay,et al.  User participation in fisheries management: lessons drawn from international experiences☆ , 1995 .

[44]  P. Dayton,et al.  Reversal of the Burden of Proof in Fisheries Management , 1998, Science.

[45]  P. A. Larkin.  An Epitaph for the Concept of Maximum Sustained Yield , 1977 .