The Active Sensing of Control Difference

Summary In everyday life, people control objects in the world around them to varying degrees. The processes people actively use to establish their control, while interacting with an environment containing large ambiguity, remain unknown. This study examines how people explore their control over the environment and how they detect small differences in control among objects. In the experimental task, participants moved three dots on a screen and identified one dot over which the level of control is different from that of the other two. The results support a two-step behavior mechanism underlying the sensing of control difference: People first explore their overall control in the environment, and then the results of the initial exploration are used to selectively tune the direction (i.e., either more or less) of the detected control difference, ensuring efficient and rapid detection of the type of control difference that is potentially important for further action selections.

[1]  Rachel Morgan,et al.  Spatial determinants in the perception of self-produced leg movements in 3- to 5-month-old infants. , 1995 .

[2]  P. Haggard.  Sense of agency in the human brain , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  C. K. Rovee,et al.  Conjugate reinforcement of infant exploratory behavior. , 1969, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  Geoffrey Bird,et al.  The influence of action–outcome contingency on motivation from control , 2018, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  P. Haggard,et al.  Sense of agency , 2012, Current Biology.

[6]  Jaison A. Manjaly,et al.  The relationship between action-effect monitoring and attention capture. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  A. Yamashita,et al.  The Sense of Agency during Continuous Action: Performance Is More Important than Action-Feedback Association , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[9]  M. Voss,et al.  The experience of agency: an interplay between prediction and postdiction , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[10]  B. Eitam,et al.  I control therefore I do: Judgments of agency influence action selection , 2015, Cognition.

[11]  P. Haggard,et al.  Prediction error and regularity detection underlie two dissociable mechanisms for computing the sense of agency , 2019, Cognition.

[12]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor prediction , 2001, Current Biology.

[13]  Clare Press,et al.  Illusions of control without delusions of grandeur , 2019, Cognition.

[14]  Wen Wen,et al.  Control Changes the Way We Look at the World , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  A. Yamashita,et al.  The influence of goals on sense of control , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews , 2022 .

[17]  P. Fletcher,et al.  Sense of agency in health and disease: A review of cue integration approaches☆ , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[18]  D. Wegner.  The mind's best trick: how we experience conscious will , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  Oliver Alan Kannape,et al.  “Self pop-out”: agency enhances self-recognition in visual search , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  B. Eitam,et al.  Motivation from control , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Wen Wen,et al.  Enhanced perceptual processing of self-generated motion: Evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2018, NeuroImage.

[23]  F. Waszak,et al.  A preactivation account of sensory attenuation , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  The Neurocognitive Bases of Human Volition. , 2018, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  P. Kok,et al.  The Perceptual Prediction Paradox , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness of action , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Baruch Eitam,et al.  Bootstrapping agency: How control-relevant information affects motivation. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[31]  James W. Moore,et al.  What Is the Sense of Agency and Why Does it Matter? , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[32]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Prediction Modulates the Perception of Self-Produced Stimuli , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[34]  Clare Press,et al.  Predicted Action Consequences Are Perceptually Facilitated Before Cancellation , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.