Barriers to MNEs green business models in the UK construction sector: An ISM analysis

Abstract The environmental and economic benefits of green business models (GBMs) are considerable if current barriers can be identified and ways of overcoming them developed. In this study, barriers to GBMs are identified by conducting a qualitative study. Nineteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with selected UK construction sector experts from academia and industry and the results were obtained by applying thematic analysis. Five major categories of barriers emerged: government constraints; financial constraints; sector constraints; company constraints; and lack of demand. To understand the collective impact of these barriers, the interpretive structural modelling (ISM) method was used. The ISM-based model showed that government constraints are driving the rest of the barriers followed by financial and construction sector constraints equally then the by company constraints. Surprisingly, lack of demand appeared to have the least significance in hindering GBM transformation compared to the rest of the barriers. The results present a clear picture of the green construction market relevant to multinational enterprises (MNEs) intending to enter the UK. MNEs are therefore influenced by the government on strategic planning and capability building for GBMs. Effective engagement with the government will generate institutional advantages resulting in legitimacy and trust for MNEs in the UK markets.

[1]  Nikhil Dev,et al.  Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approach: An Overview , 2013 .

[2]  Varun Rai,et al.  Business model innovations for deploying distributed generation: The emerging landscape of community solar in the U.S. , 2015 .

[3]  Nils Walravens,et al.  Qualitative indicators for smart city business models , 2015 .

[4]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective , 2011 .

[5]  Faisal Talib,et al.  Analysis of interaction among the barriers to total quality management implementation using interpretive structural modeling approach , 2011 .

[6]  P Shahabadkar,et al.  Deployment of Interpretive Structural Modeling Methodology in Supply Chain Management -An Overview , 2012 .

[7]  Shahin Mokhlesian,et al.  Business model changes and green construction processes , 2012 .

[8]  Tarja Häkkinen,et al.  Barriers and drivers for sustainable building , 2011 .

[9]  Begum Sertyesilisik,et al.  Deep learning approach's effectiveness on sustainability improvement in the UK construction industry , 2012 .

[10]  Akhilesh Barve,et al.  Analysis of critical success factors of humanitarian supply chain: An application of Interpretive Structural Modeling , 2015 .

[11]  Mario Richter.  German utilities and distributed PV: How to overcome barriers to business model innovation , 2013 .

[12]  Odysseus G. Manoliadis,et al.  Assessment of the economic benefits from sustainable construction in Greece , 2011 .

[13]  Mike Riley,et al.  Towards sustainable construction: promotion and best practices , 2009 .

[14]  Dirk Pilat,et al.  Why New Business Models Matter for Green Growth , 2013 .

[15]  A. Trivedi,et al.  Analysis of key factors for waste management in humanitarian response: An interpretive structural modelling approach , 2015 .

[16]  A. B. Ngowi,et al.  The globalisation of the construction industry - A review , 2005 .

[17]  George Ofori.  Frameworks for analysing international construction , 2003 .

[18]  R. Shankar,et al.  ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIONS AMONG THE BARRIERS OF REVERSE LOGISTICS , 2005 .

[19]  Sushil,et al.  Analysis of critical success factors of world-class manufacturing practices: an application of interpretative structural modelling and interpretative ranking process , 2012 .

[20]  Axel Sommer,et al.  Managing Green Business Model Transformations , 2012 .

[21]  S. Lundan.  What are Ownership Advantages? , 2009 .

[22]  Tobias Bachmeier,et al.  Business Model Generation A Handbook For Visionaries Game Changers And Challengers , 2016 .

[23]  Julia Selberherr,et al.  Sustainable life cycle offers through cooperation , 2015 .

[24]  Marjan Sarshar,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach , 2002 .

[25]  Robert Blackburn,et al.  The business case for sustainability? An examination of small firms in the UK's construction and restaurant sectors , 2007 .

[26]  Niklaus Kohler.  Long-term design, management and finance for the built environment , 2008 .

[27]  Weisheng Lu,et al.  Concentration in the international construction market , 2009 .

[28]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Business models for full service energy renovation of single-family houses in Nordic countries , 2013 .

[29]  Alexander Osterwalder,et al.  The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach , 2004 .

[30]  Seung Heon Han,et al.  Strategies for contractors to sustain growth in the global construction market , 2010 .

[31]  Kenneth F. Hyde.  Recognising deductive processes in qualitative research , 2000 .

[32]  Lars Strupeit,et al.  Overcoming barriers to renewable energy diffusion: business models for customer-sited solar photovoltaics in Japan, Germany and the United States , 2016 .

[33]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Green property development practice in China: Costs and barriers , 2011 .

[34]  Weisheng Lu,et al.  Niche comparisons: toward a new approach for analysing competition and organizational performance in the international construction market , 2013 .

[35]  Alex Opoku,et al.  Embracing sustainability practices in UK construction organizations : Challenges facing intra-organizational leadership , 2014 .

[36]  R. Haigh,et al.  Strategies for the effective engagement of multi-national construction enterprises in post-disaster building and infrastructure projects , 2012 .

[37]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Integrating Green Specifications in Construction and Overcoming Barriers in Their Use , 2009 .

[38]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Multinationals and global climate change: issues for the automotive and oil industries , 2003 .

[39]  A. Kolk,et al.  Multinational enterprises and climate change: Exploring institutional failures and embeddedness , 2011, Journal of International Business Studies.

[40]  Nils Walravens,et al.  Qualitative indicators for smart city business models : The case of mobile services and applications , 2015 .

[41]  Vinay Sharma,et al.  Analysis of challenges for management education in India using total interpretive structural modelling , 2016 .

[42]  Ilari Aho,et al.  Value-added business models: linking professionalism and delivery of sustainability , 2013 .

[43]  Sami Mahroum,et al.  A Critical Review of the Interplay between Policy Instruments and Business Models: Greening the Built Environment a Case in Point , 2014 .

[44]  Stephen Drewer.  A perspective of the international construction system , 2001 .

[45]  A. Kolk,et al.  A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change: Learning from “an inconvenient truth”? , 2008 .