Introducing Archetype Theory to Information Systems Research: A Literature Review and Call for Future Research

Studying organizational configurations on the one hand and the dynamics of organizational change on the other hand are dominant topics of interest in the information systems (IS) discipline. Studies in each of these research streams take advantage of various well-established theoretical lenses from reference disciplines such as management science. In this study, we take a closer look at archetype theory, which combines these two research streams and which eventually provides a dynamic perspective on organizational configurations. Through a literature review, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of archetype theory (i.e., its constitutive constructs and assumptions) as well as on its application in studying dynamics of configurations. In introducing archetype theory to IS research, we discuss the explanatory power of the respective theory for investigating IS phenomena as well as the methodological and theoretical implications of employing the theory in IS research.

[1]  Richard Laughlin,et al.  Environmental Disturbances and Organizational Transitions and Transformations: Some Alternative Models , 1991 .

[2]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: a practice approach , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Returning to the Frontier of Contingency Theory of Organizational and Institutional Designs , 2013 .

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Nick Rackoff,et al.  SIM Competition Paper: Information Systems for Competitive Advantage: Implemenation of a Planning Process , 1985, MIS Q..

[6]  F.,et al.  Recent applications of economic theory in Information Technology research * , 2003 .

[7]  Danny Miller,et al.  TOWARD A NEW CONTINGENCY APPROACH: THE SEARCH FOR ORGANIZATIONAL GESTALTS , 1981 .

[8]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[9]  Chris Carter,et al.  The ‘Long March’ of the Management Modernizers: Ritual, Rhetoric and Rationality , 2002 .

[10]  Anil Hira,et al.  The New Institutionalism Contradictory Notions of Change , 2000 .

[11]  Gerald G. Grant,et al.  Framing the Frameworks: A Review of IT Governance Research , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Markus Reihlen,et al.  Governance of professional service firms: a configurational approach , 2014 .

[13]  Peter Fettke,et al.  State-of-the-Art des State-of-the-Art , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[14]  Robert Chia,et al.  On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[15]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[16]  Mariannunziata Liguori,et al.  Accounting change: explaining the outcomes, interpreting the process , 2011 .

[17]  Lisa Scordato,et al.  Factors affecting strategic change in higher education , 2014 .

[18]  W. Dugger,et al.  The New Institutionalism: New But Not Institutionalist , 1990 .

[19]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  Organizational Design Types, Tracks and the Dynamics of Strategic Change , 1988 .

[21]  T. Morris,et al.  Transforming the Architect: Ownership Form and Archetype Change , 2002 .

[22]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[23]  C. R. Hinings,et al.  SECTOR-SPECIFIC PATTERNS OF ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN CHANGE* , 1995 .

[24]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Christine Legner,et al.  The Dynamics of IS Adaptation in Multinational Corporations: A New Theoretical Lens , 2013, ICIS.

[27]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Information Technology Governance in Information Technology Investment Decision Processes: The Impact of Investment Characteristics, External Environment, and Internal Context , 2008, MIS Q..

[28]  Guy Paré,et al.  Toward a New Theory of the Contribution of the IT Function in Organizations , 2012, MIS Q..

[29]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes , 1993 .

[30]  Derrick E. D'Souza,et al.  Aligning Erp Systems with International Strategies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[31]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  L. Diamond.  IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results , 2005 .

[33]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[34]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Theory – still king but needing a revolution! , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[35]  Bob Hinings,et al.  Institutionally Specific Design Archetypes: A Framework for Understanding Change in National Sport Organizations , 1992 .

[36]  Mariannunziata Liguori,et al.  Radical Change, Accounting and Public Sector Reforms: A Comparison of Italian and Canadian Municipalities , 2012 .

[37]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Alignment of the IS Functions With the Enterprise: Toward a Model of Antecedents , 1994, MIS Q..

[38]  Mariannunziata Liguori.  The Supremacy of the Sequence: Key Elements and Dimensions in the Process of Change , 2012 .

[39]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model , 2001 .

[40]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Research on Organizational Configurations: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges , 2008 .

[41]  Stephen Ackroyd,et al.  Transforming the professional archetype? , 2003 .

[42]  Michael Powell,et al.  Archetypal Change and the Professional Service Firm , 2007 .

[43]  Mike Dent,et al.  Archetype Transition in the German Health Service? The Attempted Modernization of Hospitals in a North German State , 2004 .

[44]  C. R. Hinings,et al.  Values and Organizational Structure , 1996 .

[45]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[46]  Sue Newell,et al.  Theorization and Translation in Information Technology Institutionalization: Evidence from Danish Home Care , 2014, MIS Q..

[47]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  An Empirical Taxonomy of Implementation Processes Based on Sequences of Events in Information System Development , 1993 .

[48]  Carol V. Brown.  Examining the Emergence of Hybrid IS Governance Solutions: Evidence From a Single Case Site , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[50]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism , 2017 .

[51]  David M. Brock,et al.  The Changing Professional Organization: A Review of Competing Archetypes , 2006 .

[52]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: multisite ERP implementations , 2000, CACM.

[53]  A. Pinnington,et al.  Archetype Change in Professional Organizations: Survey Evidence from Large Law Firms , 2003 .

[54]  C. Wiseman,et al.  Information systems for competitive advantage: implementation of a planning process , 1990 .

[55]  Mark Keil,et al.  Theorizing in information systems research: A reflexive analysis of the adaptation of theory in information systems research , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[56]  David J. Miller,et al.  Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis , 1986 .

[57]  Peer C. Fiss.  A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[58]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Sedimentation and Transformation in Organizational Change: The Case of Canadian Law Firms , 1996 .

[59]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Research Commentary - Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Inter-organizational information systems adoption – a configuration analysis approach , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Jackie Sanders,et al.  Journal of Health Organization and Management Implementing a new governance model : Lessons from a New Zealand statutory mental health organisation , 2016 .

[62]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..