The THEMIS Array of Ground-based Observatories for the Study of Auroral Substorms

The NASA Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) project is intended to investigate magnetospheric substorm phenomena, which are the manifestations of a basic instability of the magnetosphere and a dominant mechanism of plasma transport and explosive energy release. The major controversy in substorm science is the uncertainty as to whether the instability is initiated near the Earth, or in the more distant >20 Re magnetic tail. THEMIS will discriminate between the two possibilities by using five in-situ satellites and ground-based all-sky imagers and magnetometers, and inferring the propagation direction by timing the observation of the substorm initiation at multiple locations in the magnetosphere. An array of stations, consisting of 20 all-sky imagers (ASIs) and 30-plus magnetometers, has been developed and deployed in the North American continent, from Alaska to Labrador, for the broad coverage of the nightside magnetosphere. Each ground-based observatory (GBO) contains a white light imager that takes auroral images at a 3-second repetition rate (“cadence”) and a magnetometer that records the 3 axis variation of the magnetic field at 2 Hz frequency. The stations return compressed images, “thumbnails,” to two central databases: one located at UC Berkeley and the other at the University of Calgary, Canada. The full images are recorded at each station on hard drives, and these devices are physically returned to the two data centers for data copying. All data are made available for public use by scientists in “browse products,” accessible by using internet browsers or in the form of downloadable CDF data files (the “browse products” are described in detail in a later section). Twenty all-sky imager stations are installed and running at the time of this publication. An example of a substorm was observed on the 23rd of December 2006, and from the THEMIS GBO data, we found that the substorm onset brightening of the equatorward arc was a gradual process (>27 seconds), with minimal morphology changes until the arc breaks up. The breakup was timed to the nearest frame (<3 s) and located to the nearest latitude degree at about ±3oE in longitude. The data also showed that a similar breakup occurred in Alaska ∼10 minutes later, highlighting the need for an array to distinguish prime onset.

[1]  M. Kivelson,et al.  Satellite studies of magnetospheric substorms on August 15, 1968: 5. Energetic electrons, spatial boundaries, and wave‐particle interactions at Ogo 5 , 1973 .

[2]  Etienne Renotte,et al.  Far ultraviolet imaging from the IMAGE spacecraft. 1. System design , 2000 .

[3]  N. Østgaard,et al.  FAST and IMAGE-FUV observations of a substorm onset , 2003 .

[4]  Vassilis Angelopoulos,et al.  The THEMIS Mission , 2008 .

[5]  R. Landshoff,et al.  Physics of the Aurora and Airglow , 1961 .

[6]  A. Lui,et al.  A synthesis of magnetospheric substorm models , 1991 .

[7]  S. Mende,et al.  Instrument for the monochromatic observation of all sky auroral images. , 1977, Applied optics.

[8]  Robert L. McPherron,et al.  Satellite studies of magnetospheric substorms on August 15, 1968. IX - Phenomenological model for substorms. , 1973 .

[9]  S. Akasofu The dynamical morphology of the aurora polaris , 1963 .

[10]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Neutral line model of substorms: Past results and present view , 1996 .

[11]  Martin Connors,et al.  The THEMIS all-sky imaging array—system design and initial results from the prototype imager , 2006 .

[12]  J. Maggs,et al.  Measurements of the thicknesses of auroral structures. , 1968 .

[13]  Syun-Ichi Akasofu,et al.  The development of the auroral substorm. , 1964 .

[14]  Muamer Zukic,et al.  A far ultraviolet imager for the International Solar-Terrestrial Physics Mission , 1995 .

[15]  M. Conde,et al.  The application of ground-based optical techniques for inferring electron energy deposition and composition change during auroral precipitation events , 2006 .

[16]  Mario H. Acuna,et al.  Energy deposition by Alfvén waves into the dayside auroral oval: Cluster and FAST observations , 2005 .

[17]  S. Akasofu Magnetospheric Substorms: A Model , 1972 .

[18]  E. W. Hones Plasma sheet variations during substorms , 1972 .

[19]  Martin Connors,et al.  THEMIS Ground Based Observatory System Design , 2008 .

[20]  J. D. Craven,et al.  Imaging results from Dynamics Explorer 1 , 1988 .

[21]  T. Davis The application of image orthicon techniques to auroral observation , 1966 .

[22]  J. H. Doolittle,et al.  Multistation observations of auroras: Polar cap substorms , 1999 .

[23]  S. Akasofu Physics of magnetospheric substorms , 1977 .

[24]  S. Akasofu Polar and magnetospheric substorms , 1968 .

[25]  T. Rosenberg Recent results from correlative ionosphere and magnetosphere studies incorporating antarctic observations , 2000 .

[26]  Harald U. Frey,et al.  Substorm onset observations by IMAGE-FUV , 2004 .

[27]  Harald U. Frey,et al.  Far Ultraviolet Imaging from the Image Spacecraft , 2000 .

[28]  J. Lilensten,et al.  Electron transport and energy degradation in the ionosphere: evaluation of the numerical solution, comparison with laboratory experiments and auroral observations , 1994 .

[29]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  Determination of substorm onset timing and location using the THEMIS ground based observatories , 2007 .

[30]  John D. Craven,et al.  Global auroral imaging instrumentation for the Dynamics Explorer mission. , 1981 .

[31]  T. Pulkkinen,et al.  Observations of Substorm Electrodynamics Using the MIRACLE Network , 1998 .

[32]  Syun-Ichi Akasofu,et al.  Dynamic morphology of auroras , 1965 .