Improving the visibility of bicycle infrastructure

The visual characteristics of road infrastructure play a major role in a substantial number of single-bicycle crashes. The focus of this research was on finding the most common situations that result in a poorly visible bicycle infrastructure, and investigating how to improve these conditions for vulnerable cyclist populations, specifically the visually impaired and the older cyclist. Three studies were performed, a questionnaire study amongst visually impaired cyclists, focus group discussions with older cyclists, and an experiment on a closed track where participants’ vision, in particular their contrast sensitivity, was impaired. The results from the questionnaire study and the focus group discussions revealed that bollards, kerbs, and cycle path markings/shoulders are the most critical visual elements in the road infrastructure. In addition, cycling performance and cyclists’ feelings of safety worsened in conditions where the visibility of obstacles and the road’s course were the poorest. Visibility can be enhanced by placing red-white bollards, painting kerbs white, by enhancing clearness of the road’s shoulder, or by applying high contrast road markings on the side of the cycle path/road.

[1]  Veli-Pekka Kallberg,et al.  REFLECTOR POSTS--SIGNS OF DANGER? , 1993 .

[2]  H. Nijland,et al.  Do the Health Benefits of Cycling Outweigh the Risks? , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Effects of listening to music, and of using a handheld and handsfree telephone on cycling behaviour , 2011 .

[4]  T. Coeckelbergh,et al.  Effect of compensatory viewing strategies on practical fitness to drive in subjects with visual field defects caused by ocular pathology , 2002 .

[5]  Paul Schepers,et al.  What do cyclists need to see to avoid single-bicycle crashes? , 2011, Ergonomics.

[6]  J. Wood,et al.  Elderly Drivers and Simulated Visual Impairment , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Mobile phone use while cycling: Incidence and effects on behaviour and safety , 2010, Ergonomics.

[8]  A J McKnight,et al.  The effect of lane line width and contrast upon lanekeeping. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  E.W. Hill,et al.  Mobility in Individuals with Moderate Visual Impairments , 1990 .

[10]  I. Bailey,et al.  Visual Factors and Orientation‐Mobility Performance , 1982, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[11]  J. Wood,et al.  The effect of artificial visual impairment on functional visual fields and driving performance , 1993 .

[12]  Peter Boyce Lighting for Driving: Roads, Vehicles, Signs, and Signals , 2008 .

[13]  U Björnstig,et al.  Road characteristics and bicycle accidents , 1996, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[14]  Joanne M. Wood,et al.  Closed-Road Circuit Age and Visual Impairment Decrease Driving Performance as Measured on a , 2005 .

[15]  L Spazzafumo,et al.  Outdoor mobility and social relationships of elderly people. , 1997, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[16]  D de Waard,et al.  Road-edge delineation in rural areas: effects on driving behaviour , 2000, Ergonomics.

[17]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  How much visual road information is needed to drive safely and comfortably , 2004 .

[18]  Frank Lai,et al.  Driving simulators for robust comparisons: a case study evaluating road safety engineering treatments. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Jörgen Larsson Traffic injuries 1998-2005, according to patient statistics , 2008 .

[20]  F.R.H. Zijlstra,et al.  Efficiency in work behaviour: A design approach for modern tools , 1993 .

[21]  Wiebo H Brouwer,et al.  OLDER DRIVERS AND ATTENTIONAL DEMANDS: CONSEQUENCES FOR HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH. , 1993 .

[22]  Young eyes for elderly people. A clinical comparison of spherical and aspheric intraocular lenses , 2005 .