A note on DeCaro, Thomas, and Beilock (2008): Further data demonstrate complexities in the assessment of information–integration category learning

DeCaro et al. [DeCaro, M. S., Thomas, R. D., & Beilock, S. L. (2008). Individual differences in category learning: Sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more. Cognition, 107(1), 284-294] explored how individual differences in working memory capacity differentially mediate the learning of distinct category structures. Specifically, their results showed that greater working memory capacity facilitates the learning of novel category structures that are verbalisable and discoverable through logical reasoning processes. Conversely, however, greater working memory was shown to impede the learning of novel category structures thought to be non-verbalisable, inaccessible to conscious reasoning and discoverable only through implicit (procedural) learning of appropriate stimulus-category responses. The present paper calls into question the specific nature of the category learning tasks used, in particular their ability to discriminate between different modes of category learning.

[1]  Henri Cohen,et al.  Handbook of categorization in cognitive science , 2005 .

[2]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Chapter 25 – MULTIPLE SYSTEMS OF PERCEPTUAL CATEGORY LEARNING: THEORY AND COGNITIVE TESTS , 2005 .

[3]  Corey J. Bohil,et al.  Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  F. Ashby,et al.  The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: Evidence for multiple category learning systems , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Human category learning. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Marci S. DeCaro,et al.  Individual differences in category learning: Sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more , 2008, Cognition.

[8]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Neural correlates of rule-based and information-integration visual category learning. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Jeffrey B. O’Brien,et al.  The effects of positive versus negative feedback on information-integration category learning , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. , 1994, Psychological review.

[12]  W Todd Maddox,et al.  Disrupting feedback processing interferes with rule-based but not information-integration category learning , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Shawn W. Ell,et al.  The neurobiology of human category learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. , 1998, Psychological review.

[15]  Shawn W. Ell,et al.  Category learning deficits in Parkinson's disease. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[16]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization , 1993 .

[17]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning , 2006, Memory & cognition.